• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析生理反应作为有条件自动驾驶中驾驶员接管准备程度的指标。

An analysis of physiological responses as indicators of driver takeover readiness in conditionally automated driving.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, MI 48109, United States.

School of Computing, Clemson University, SC 29631, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Feb;195:107372. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107372. Epub 2023 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2023.107372
PMID:37979464
Abstract

By the year 2045, it is projected that Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) will make up half of the new vehicle market. Successful adoption of AVs can reduce drivers' stress and fatigue, curb traffic congestion, and improve safety, mobility, and economic efficiency. Due to the limited intelligence in relevant technologies, human-in-the-loop modalities are still necessary to ensure the safety of AVs at current or near future stages, because the vehicles may not be able to handle all emergencies. Therefore, it is important to know the takeover readiness of the drivers to ensure the takeover quality and avoid any potential accidents. To achieve this, a comprehensive understanding of the drivers' physiological states is crucial. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis of the correlation between different human physiological responses and takeover behaviors which could serve as important references for future studies to determine the types of data to use. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of takeover behaviors on the common physiological indicators. A program for conditional automation was developed based on a game engine and applied to a driving simulator. The experiment incorporated three types of secondary tasks, three takeover events, and two traffic densities. Brain signals, Skin Conductance Level (SCL), and Heart Rate (HR) of the participants were collected while they were performing the driving simulations. The Frontal Asymmetry Index (FAI) (as an indicator of engagement) and Mental Workload (MWL) were calculated from the brain signals to indicate the mental states of the participants. The results revealed that the FAI of the drivers would slightly decrease after the takeover alerts were issued when they were doing secondary tasks prior to the takeover activities, and the higher difficulty of the secondary tasks could lead to lower overall FAI during the takeover periods. In contrast, The MWL and SCL increased during the takeover periods. The HR also increased rapidly at the beginning of the takeover period but dropped back to a normal level quickly. It was found that a fake takeover alert would lead to lower overall HR, slower increase, and lower peak of SCL during the takeover periods. Moreover, the higher traffic density scenarios were associated with higher MWL, and a more difficult secondary task would lead to higher MWL and HR during the takeover activities. A preliminary discussion of the correlation between the physiological data, takeover scenario, and vehicle data (that relevant to takeover readiness) was then conducted, revealing that although takeover event, SCL, and HR had slightly higher correlations with the maximum acceleration and reaction time, none of them dominated the takeover readiness. In addition, the analysis of the data across different participants was conducted, which emphasized the importance of considering standardization or normalization of the data when they were further used as input features for estimating takeover readiness. Overall, the results presented in this paper offer profound insights into the patterns of physiological data changes during takeover periods. These findings can be used as benchmarks for utilizing these variables as indicators of takeover preparedness and performance in future research endeavors.

摘要

到 2045 年,预计自动驾驶汽车(AV)将占据新车市场的一半。成功采用自动驾驶汽车可以减轻驾驶员的压力和疲劳,缓解交通拥堵,提高安全性、机动性和经济效率。由于相关技术的智能有限,在当前或近期阶段,仍然需要人机交互模式来确保自动驾驶汽车的安全,因为车辆可能无法处理所有紧急情况。因此,了解驾驶员的接管准备情况对于确保接管质量和避免任何潜在事故非常重要。要实现这一目标,全面了解驾驶员的生理状态至关重要。然而,目前缺乏对不同人体生理反应与接管行为之间相关性的系统分析,这可以为未来的研究提供重要参考,以确定使用哪种类型的数据。本文全面分析了接管行为对常见生理指标的影响。基于游戏引擎开发了一个条件自动化程序,并将其应用于驾驶模拟器中。该实验纳入了三种类型的次要任务、三种接管事件和两种交通密度。参与者在执行驾驶模拟时,采集了他们的脑信号、皮肤电导率(SCL)和心率(HR)。从脑信号中计算出额叶不对称指数(FAI)(作为参与度的指标)和心理工作量(MWL),以指示参与者的心理状态。结果表明,在进行接管活动之前,驾驶员在执行次要任务时,在收到接管警报后,其驾驶员的 FAI 会略有下降,而次要任务的难度越高,在接管期间的整体 FAI 越低。相比之下,MWL 和 SCL 在接管期间增加。HR 在接管期间开始时也会迅速上升,但很快回落到正常水平。研究发现,虚假接管警报会导致接管期间的整体 HR 降低、增加速度较慢且 SCL 峰值较低。此外,较高的交通密度场景与较高的 MWL 相关,而更困难的次要任务会导致接管活动期间的 MWL 和 HR 升高。然后对生理数据、接管场景和车辆数据(与接管准备情况相关)之间的相关性进行了初步讨论,结果表明,尽管接管事件、SCL 和 HR 与最大加速度和反应时间的相关性略高,但没有一个因素占主导地位。此外,对不同参与者的数据进行了分析,强调了在将这些数据进一步用作估计接管准备情况的输入特征时,考虑数据的标准化或归一化的重要性。总体而言,本文提出的结果深入了解了接管期间生理数据变化的模式。这些发现可作为利用这些变量作为接管准备和性能指标的基准,用于未来的研究工作。

相似文献

1
An analysis of physiological responses as indicators of driver takeover readiness in conditionally automated driving.分析生理反应作为有条件自动驾驶中驾驶员接管准备程度的指标。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Feb;195:107372. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107372. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
2
The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.接管请求提前期对驾驶员从高速公路手动驶出的情境意识的影响:基于网络的 3 级自动驾驶汽车研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Apr;168:106593. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106593. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
3
Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.条件自动化驾驶中接管请求的心理生理响应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105804. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105804. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
4
How Can the Trust-Change Direction be Measured and Identified During Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving? Using Physiological Responses and Takeover-Related Factors.在有条件自动驾驶接管过渡期间,如何衡量和识别信任转变方向?使用生理反应和接管相关因素。
Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1276-1301. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143855. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
5
Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.不可靠自动化、非驾驶相关任务以及接管时间预算对驾驶员接管性能和工作量的影响。
Ergonomics. 2023 Feb;66(2):182-197. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2069868. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.预测条件自动化驾驶中的驾驶员接管性能。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105748. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105748. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
The impact of non-driving related tasks on the development of driver sleepiness and takeover performances in prolonged automated driving.非驾驶相关任务对长时间自动驾驶中驾驶员困倦和接管性能的影响。
J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:148-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 22.
8
In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.心跳之间:利用驾驶员的生理变化来判断高度自动化车辆接管的质量。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
9
A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles.条件自动化车辆高速公路出口接管计划中驾驶员响应时间的计算认知模型。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1583-1599. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143028. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
10
Driver behavior and mental workload for takeover safety in automated driving: ACT-R prediction modeling approach.自动驾驶接管安全中的驾驶员行为和心理负荷:ACT-R 预测建模方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):381-389. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2300640. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Takeover Proficiency in Conditionally Automated Driving: Understanding Stabilization Time with Driving and Physiological Signals.接管后条件自动驾驶熟练度:通过驾驶和生理信号理解稳定时间。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 17;24(10):3193. doi: 10.3390/s24103193.
2
Persona-PhysioSync AV: Personalized Interaction through Personality and Physiology Monitoring in Autonomous Vehicles.人物-生理同步 AV:自动驾驶汽车中的个性和生理监测的个性化交互。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 20;24(6):1977. doi: 10.3390/s24061977.