Department of Work & Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, the Netherlands; TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, Leiden 2316 ZL, the Netherlands.
TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, Leiden 2316 ZL, the Netherlands.
Midwifery. 2024 Jan;128:103869. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103869. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
Effective interventions are needed to promote informed decision making about vaccination.
We developed a group-antenatal care (CP; Centering Pregnancy) intervention, i.e., a session about MPV within existing group-care settings, to promote informed decision making about Maternal Pertussis Vaccination in the Netherlands.
This study aimed to assess (1) to what extent the intervention was implemented as intended, (2) to what extent the intervention met the needs and wishes of pregnant individuals and midwives facilitating CP.
We conducted exploratory interviews with 6 CP facilitators and 10 CP participants to assess the implementation of the intervention, and how the intervention and its different components were perceived. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. In addition, we conducted a pre- and post-intervention survey amongst 35 participants, measuring knowledge about MPV, and MPV attitude and intention.
The CP intervention was implemented as intended in 6 out of 7 groups. Participants were positive about the interactive CP-methods used to discuss MPV. Participants and facilitators evaluated the intervention as positive and relevant, although the intervention was time-consuming, and some participants had already made the de decision about MPV. Those who had not yet decided indicated that the session was helpful for their decision.
Discussing MPV in CP care settings is a feasible strategy to support decision making about MPV during pregnancy. The intervention could be improved by discussing the MPV sooner than 16-18 weeks of pregnancy. A larger-scale study is needed to assess effects on MPV uptake and informed decision making.
需要有效的干预措施来促进疫苗接种决策的知情选择。
我们开发了一种群体产前保健 (CP; Centering Pregnancy) 干预措施,即在现有的群体保健环境中进行关于 MPV 的课程,以促进荷兰产妇百日咳疫苗接种的知情决策。
本研究旨在评估 (1) 干预措施在多大程度上按计划实施,(2) 干预措施在多大程度上满足了 CP 促进者和参与者的需求和愿望。
我们对 6 名 CP 促进者和 10 名 CP 参与者进行了探索性访谈,以评估干预措施的实施情况,以及干预措施及其不同组成部分的感知情况。访谈使用主题分析进行分析。此外,我们在 35 名参与者中进行了干预前后的调查,测量了他们对 MPV 的知识、MPV 态度和意图。
CP 干预措施在 7 个小组中的 6 个小组中按计划实施。参与者对用于讨论 MPV 的互动 CP 方法持积极态度。参与者和促进者对干预措施的评价是积极的,认为该干预措施是相关的,尽管该干预措施很耗时,并且一些参与者已经对 MPV 做出了决定。那些尚未做出决定的人表示,该课程有助于他们做出决定。
在 CP 保健环境中讨论 MPV 是支持孕妇在怀孕期间做出 MPV 决策的一种可行策略。可以通过更早地(16-18 周之前)讨论 MPV 来改进干预措施。需要进行更大规模的研究来评估对 MPV 接种率和知情决策的影响。