• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青光眼患者行微管植入术后失败的风险因素。

Risk Factors for Failure in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Microshunt Implantation.

机构信息

From the Department of Ophthalmology (A.R., P.D., A.C., S.D.C.), University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy; Department of Health Sciences (A.R., S.D.C.), Università del Piemonte Orientale "Amedeo Avogadro", Novara, Italy.

Department of Ophthalmology (R.T., P.B., C.C., F.B.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar;259:117-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.11.011. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2023.11.011
PMID:37979601
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for failure of Microshunt in glaucoma patients.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The study included 220 eyes from 220 consecutive glaucoma patients undergoing Microshunt implantation at six glaucoma units. Four intraocular pressure (IOP) success criteria were defined: (A) IOP ≤21 mm Hg with ≥20% IOP reduction; (B) IOP ≤18 mm Hg with ≥20% IOP reduction; (C) IOP ≤15 mm Hg with ≥25% IOP reduction; and (D) IOP ≤12 mm Hg with ≥30% IOP reduction from baseline. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate success rates according to the criteria above, and multivariable Cox models were used to identified risk factors for failure according to criterion A.

RESULTS

Success rates varied based on different criteria, ranging from 43.3% to 62.5% (overall success for criteria D and A, respectively) and from 35.3% to 44.4% (complete success for criteria D and A, respectively) at 1-year follow-up. Higher intraoperative MMC concentration was associated with reduced risk of failure to maintain complete (0.4 vs 0.2 mg/mL: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.441, P < .001) and overall (0.4 vs 0.2 mg/mL: HR = 0.360, P = .004) success. For complete success, other risk factors for failure were pseudoexfoliation glaucoma/pigmentary glaucoma (HR = 1.641, P = .004), primary angle closure glaucoma (HR = 1.611, P < .001), and previous non-glaucomatous ocular surgeries (HR = 2.301, P = .002). For overall success, other risk factors for failure were lower preoperative IOP (for 1-mm Hg increase, HR = 0.934, P = .005), higher number of preoperative antiglaucoma agents (HR = 1.626, P < .001), and Microshunt combined with cataract surgery (HR = 1.526, P = .033).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified risk factors for Microshunt failure, highlighting the importance of high intraoperative MMC dose and careful patient selection to optimize surgical success.

摘要

目的

评估青光眼患者中 Microshunt 失败的风险因素。

设计

多中心回顾性队列研究。

方法

该研究纳入了 220 例(220 只眼)在 6 个青光眼单位接受 Microshunt 植入的青光眼连续患者。定义了 4 个眼压(IOP)成功标准:(A)IOP≤21mmHg,IOP 降低≥20%;(B)IOP≤18mmHg,IOP 降低≥20%;(C)IOP≤15mmHg,IOP 降低≥25%;(D)IOP≤12mmHg,IOP 降低≥30%。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析根据上述标准估计成功率,并采用多变量 Cox 模型根据标准 A 确定失败的风险因素。

结果

根据不同的标准,成功率有所不同,在 1 年随访时,成功率范围为 43.3%至 62.5%(标准 D 和 A 的总成功率)和 35.3%至 44.4%(标准 D 和 A 的完全成功率)。术中 MMC 浓度较高与维持完全(0.4 与 0.2mg/mL:风险比[HR] = 0.441,P<.001)和总体(0.4 与 0.2mg/mL:HR = 0.360,P =.004)成功的失败风险降低有关。对于完全成功,失败的其他风险因素为假性剥脱性青光眼/色素性青光眼(HR = 1.641,P =.004)、原发性闭角型青光眼(HR = 1.611,P<.001)和既往非青光眼眼部手术(HR = 2.301,P =.002)。对于总体成功,失败的其他风险因素为术前眼压较低(增加 1mmHg,HR = 0.934,P =.005)、术前抗青光眼药物数量较高(HR = 1.626,P<.001)和 Microshunt 联合白内障手术(HR = 1.526,P =.033)。

结论

本研究确定了 Microshunt 失败的风险因素,强调了术中使用高剂量 MMC 和仔细选择患者以优化手术成功率的重要性。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Failure in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Microshunt Implantation.青光眼患者行微管植入术后失败的风险因素。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar;259:117-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.11.011. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
2
Ab Externo SIBS Microshunt with Mitomycin C for Open-Angle Glaucoma: Three-Year Results as a Primary Surgical Intervention.用于开角型青光眼的含丝裂霉素C的经外路SIBS微型分流器:作为主要手术干预措施的三年结果
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023 Sep-Oct;6(5):480-492. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
3
Intermediate Outcomes of a Novel Standalone Ab Externo SIBS Microshunt With Mitomycin C.新型独立式 Ab Externo SIBS 微分流控阀联合丝裂霉素 C 的中期疗效。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;215:141-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.020. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
One-year outcomes of stand-alone ab externo SIBS microshunt implantation in refractory glaucoma.难治性青光眼中独立 ab externo SIBS 微分流植入术的一年疗效。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;106(1):71-79. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317299. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
5
Safety and Effectiveness of the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Results from a 2-Year Multicenter Study.PRESERFLO® MicroShunt 在原发性开角型青光眼的安全性和有效性:来自一项为期 2 年的多中心研究的结果。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Mar-Apr;5(2):195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: One-Year Results from a 2-Year Randomized, Multicenter Study.外引流微管植入术与小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼:一项为期 2 年的随机、多中心研究的 1 年结果。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Dec;128(12):1710-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Intraocular Pressure Outcomes and Risk Factors for Failure in the Collaborative Bleb-Related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study.眼内压结局和Collaborative Bleb-Related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study 研究中失败的风险因素。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Nov;122(11):2223-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.038. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
8
Long-term outcomes of repeat vs initial trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma.开角型青光眼再次小梁切除术与初次小梁切除术的长期预后
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;148(5):685-695.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.05.032.
9
Long-term Outcomes of Mitomycin-C Trabeculectomy in Exfoliative Glaucoma Versus Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.丝裂霉素C小梁切除术治疗剥脱性青光眼与原发性开角型青光眼的长期疗效
J Glaucoma. 2017 Apr;26(4):303-310. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000365.
10
Hypotony Failure Criteria in Glaucoma Surgical Studies and Their Influence on Surgery Success.青光眼手术研究中的低眼压失败标准及其对手术成功的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2024 Jul;131(7):803-814. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
3-year real-world outcomes of standalone PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation - effectiveness and safety profile.单独植入PreserFlo微分流器的3年真实世界结果——有效性和安全性概况。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06928-0.
2
Factors Affecting Bleb Morphology and Postoperative Intraocular Pressure in Inferotemporal PreserFlo MicroShunt Implantation.影响颞下象限PreserFlo微分流植入术中滤过泡形态及术后眼压的因素
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jun 2;14(6):32. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.6.32.
3
Early Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Profile Following Micropulse vs Continuous Wave Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation: Cohort Study.
微脉冲与连续波经巩膜睫状体光凝术后早期眼压变化情况:队列研究
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2025 Jan-Mar;19(1):8-14. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1466. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
4
Management practices and surgical techniques for ab externo less invasive glaucoma surgery: a literature review and expert recommendations.外路微创青光眼手术的管理实践与手术技术:文献综述及专家建议
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06843-4.
5
Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation: A Narrative Review of Its Standalone Benefits vs. Combined Use with Phacoemulsification in Managing Open-Angle Glaucoma.Preserflo微分流植入术:关于其在治疗开角型青光眼时单独使用的益处与与白内障超声乳化联合使用的叙述性综述。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jan;14(1):41-54. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01068-w. Epub 2024 Dec 5.