Suppr超能文献

急诊医疗服务系统的交界区出血控制

EMS Junctional Hemorrhage Control

作者信息

Spiegel Sarah, Baker Annalee M.

机构信息

NYU/Bellevue

Abstract

In the United States, trauma remains the leading cause of death in patients aged 46 and younger and the fourth leading cause of mortality across all age groups. Trauma fatalities are mostly due to catastrophic hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury. Most hemorrhage-related traumatic deaths occur in the first 2 hours after injury, though around one-fourth of the cases are preventable. Proper prehospital care, including swift medical or surgical hemorrhage control, can dramatically impact mortality and patient outcomes. The use of extremity tourniquets is perhaps the most well-known prehospital intervention for traumatic hemorrhage. Tourniquets control hemorrhage, occluding the injured artery by applying constant, firm circumferential pressure proximal to the bleeding site. As with other aspects of evidence-based trauma care, military data provided the earliest robust evidence for tourniquets' usefulness in controlling hemorrhage. The widespread application of extremity tourniquets in recent Iraq and Afghanistan wars successfully reduced hemorrhage-related mortality. Subsequently, in 2015, a federal interagency workgroup launched a nationwide public health campaign called “Stop the Bleed.” The program translates combat medicine's hemorrhage control techniques to the civilian sphere by teaching basic bystander actions that stem life-threatening bleeding. Additionally, tourniquets have become increasingly available to trained civilian EMS providers. After seeing the success of extremity tourniquets, the focus has now shifted to preventing battlefield deaths by exsanguination from sites not amenable to tourniquet use. Traditional trauma education programs teach that 6 locations must be considered as sources of potentially fatal hemorrhage in a trauma patient: 1. Chest cavity. 2. Abdominal cavity. 3. Retroperitoneum. 4. Pelvis. 5. Long bone fractures. 6. “Street” (scalp or other external sources). While identifying the bleeding site is critical, determining whether or not it is manually compressible is also vital. Deep areas of internal bleeding, such as solid organ injury in the abdominal cavity, clearly cannot be easily controlled or recognized in the prehospital setting. However, hemorrhage from an extremity long bone fracture may be controlled by proper proximal tourniquet application. Scalp and other external wounds may respond to direct manual pressure, wound packing, or pressure dressings.   Enemy use of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) in recent wars led to an increase in pelvic fracture cases with associated groin or high leg injuries. The term "junctional hemorrhage" was introduced in the literature in 2009, referring to hemorrhage in the junction between the torso and the neck or one or more extremities. That time was also marked by renewed efforts to develop techniques and devices for junctional hemorrhage control both on the battlefield and at home. Sites involved in junctional hemorrhage include the groin, axilla, perineum, shoulder girdle, and base of the neck. Hemorrhage in these areas is potentially life-threatening and must not be missed during prehospital management. Junctional hemorrhage may or may not be manually compressible. However, it is generally not amenable to traditional tourniquets due to the injury's proximal location. Rapid exsanguination and death may result from uncontrolled junctional hemorrhage. Studies estimate that 19% of preventable Iraq and Afghanistan battlefield deaths between 2001 and 2011 involved junctional hemorrhage.  When compressible, junctional injuries often require constant, direct manual pressure against the site. This is often challenging to achieve due to the typically limited personnel and unpredictability of circumstances in prehospital settings. Wound packing, hemostatic agents and dressings, junctional tourniquet devices, and others may be necessary to control junctional hemorrhage in the field and increase survival rates. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers must be trained to properly and promptly recognize, assess, and manage junctional injuries. This article will review the considerations and most current management options for prehospital junctional hemorrhage control.

摘要

在美国,创伤仍是46岁及以下患者的首要死因,也是所有年龄组中第四大死因。创伤致死主要归因于灾难性出血和创伤性脑损伤。大多数与出血相关的创伤性死亡发生在受伤后的头2小时内,不过约四分之一的病例是可预防的。恰当的院前护理,包括迅速的医疗或手术止血,可显著影响死亡率和患者预后。使用肢体止血带可能是最广为人知的创伤性出血院前干预措施。止血带通过在出血部位近端施加持续、稳固的环形压力来控制出血,从而阻断受伤动脉。与循证创伤护理的其他方面一样,军事数据最早有力地证明了止血带在控制出血方面的有效性。在最近的伊拉克和阿富汗战争中,肢体止血带的广泛应用成功降低了与出血相关的死亡率。随后,2015年,一个联邦跨部门工作组发起了一项名为“止血行动”的全国性公共卫生运动。该项目通过教授基本的旁观者行动来阻止危及生命的出血,将战斗医学中的出血控制技术应用到民用领域。此外,经过培训的民用紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员越来越容易获得止血带。在看到肢体止血带的成功后,现在的重点已转向预防因无法使用止血带的部位失血过多而导致的战场死亡。传统的创伤教育项目指出,创伤患者中有6个部位必须被视为潜在致命出血的来源:1. 胸腔。2. 腹腔。3. 腹膜后。4. 骨盆。5. 长骨骨折。6. “体表”(头皮或其他外部来源)。虽然确定出血部位至关重要,但判断其是否可用手压迫也同样关键。腹腔内实质性器官损伤等深部内出血,在院前环境中显然不易控制或识别。然而,通过正确应用近端止血带,可控制四肢长骨骨折引起的出血。头皮和其他外部伤口可通过直接手动压迫、伤口填塞或加压包扎来止血。在最近的战争中,敌人使用简易爆炸装置(IED)导致骨盆骨折病例增加,并伴有腹股沟或大腿上部受伤。“交界性出血”一词于2009年在文献中被提出,指的是躯干与颈部或一个或多个肢体之间交界处的出血。那个时期的特点还包括在战场和国内重新努力开发交界性出血控制技术和设备。涉及交界性出血的部位包括腹股沟、腋窝、会阴、肩胛带和颈部基部。这些部位的出血可能危及生命,在院前管理中绝不能被忽视。交界性出血可能可用手压迫,也可能不可用手压迫。然而,由于损伤位置靠近近端,通常不适合使用传统止血带。未控制的交界性出血可能导致迅速失血和死亡。研究估计,2001年至2011年间,在伊拉克和阿富汗战场可预防的死亡中,19%与交界性出血有关。当可用手压迫时,交界性损伤通常需要持续、直接地对出血部位施加手动压迫。由于院前环境中人员通常有限且情况不可预测,这往往很难做到。在现场控制交界性出血并提高生存率可能需要伤口填塞、止血剂和敷料、交界性止血带装置等。紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员必须接受培训,以便正确、迅速地识别、评估和处理交界性损伤。本文将综述院前交界性出血控制的注意事项和最新管理方法。

相似文献

10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验