Suppr超能文献

肺毛细血管楔压能否可靠反映肺毛细血管后肺动脉高压?

Is Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure a Reliable Indicator of Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Başakşehir Pine and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Cardiology, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jan 15;211:307-315. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.11.034. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

Abstract

Although current pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines recommend a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) >15 mm Hg for the detection of a postcapillary component, the rationale of this recommendation may not be quite compatible with the peculiar hemodynamics of PH. We hypothesize that a high PCWP alone does not necessarily indicate left-sided disease, and this diagnosis can be improved using left ventricle transmural pressure difference (∆ P). In this 2-center, retrospective, observational study, we enrolled 1,070 patients with PH who underwent heart catheterization, with the final study population comprising 961 cases. ∆ P was calculated as PCWP minus right atrial pressure. The patients with group II PH had significantly higher ∆ P values (12.6 ± 6.6 mm Hg) compared with the other groups (1.1 ± 4.8 in group I, 12.4 ± 6.6 in group II, 2.5 ± 6.4 in group III, and 0.8 ± 8.0 in group IV, p <0.001) despite overlapping PCWP values. A ∆ P cutoff of 7 mm Hg identifies left heart disease when PCWP is >15 (area under curve 0.825, 95% confidence interval 0.784 to 0.866, p <0.001). Five-year mortality was significantly higher in patients with high ∆ P and PCWP subgroups compared with low ∆ P plus high PCWP (26.1% vs 18.5%, p = 0.027) and low ∆ P and PCWP subgroups (26.1% vs 15.6%, p <0.001). ∆ P has supplementary discriminatory power in distinguishing patients with and without postcapillary PH. In conclusion, a new approach utilizing ∆ P may improve our understanding of PH pathophysiology and may identify a subpopulation that may potentially benefit from PH-specific treatments.

摘要

虽然目前的肺动脉高压 (PH) 指南建议肺毛细血管楔压 (PCWP) >15mmHg 用于检测后毛细血管成分,但这一建议的基本原理可能与 PH 的特殊血液动力学不太相符。我们假设,单纯的高 PCWP 并不一定表示存在左侧疾病,并且可以使用左心室壁间压力差 (∆P) 来改善这一诊断。在这项 2 中心、回顾性、观察性研究中,我们纳入了 1070 例接受心导管检查的 PH 患者,最终研究人群包括 961 例病例。∆P 计算为 PCWP 减去右心房压。与其他组相比,组 II PH 患者的 ∆P 值显著更高(12.6±6.6mmHg),而其他组的 ∆P 值分别为:组 I(1.1±4.8mmHg)、组 II(12.4±6.6mmHg)、组 III(2.5±6.4mmHg)和组 IV(0.8±8.0mmHg)(p<0.001),尽管 PCWP 值重叠。当 PCWP >15mmHg 时,∆P 截断值为 7mmHg 可识别左心疾病(曲线下面积 0.825,95%置信区间 0.784 至 0.866,p<0.001)。与低 ∆P 加高 PCWP 组相比,高 ∆P 和 PCWP 亚组以及高 ∆P 和低 PCWP 亚组的 5 年死亡率显著更高(26.1% vs. 18.5%,p=0.027)和(26.1% vs. 15.6%,p<0.001)。∆P 在鉴别有无后毛细血管 PH 患者方面具有补充的鉴别能力。总之,利用 ∆P 的新方法可能有助于我们理解 PH 的病理生理学,并可能确定可能从 PH 特异性治疗中受益的亚群。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验