Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May-Jun;14(3):241-251. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.11.008. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
Historically, toxicity concerns have existed in patients with large prostate glands treated with radiation therapy, particularly brachytherapy. There are questions whether this risk extends to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In this retrospective review, we examine clinical outcomes of patients with prostate glands ≥100 cc treated curatively with SBRT.
We retrospectively analyzed a large institutional database to identify patients with histologically confirmed localized prostate cancer in glands ≥100 cc, who were treated with definitive-robotic SBRT. Prostate volume (PV) was determined by treatment planning magnetic resonance imaging. Toxicity was measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Many patients received the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Quality of Life questionnaires. Minimum follow-up (FU) was 2 years.
Seventy-one patients were identified with PV ≥100 cc. Most had grade group (GG) 1 or 2 (41% and 37%, respectively) disease. All patients received a total dose of 3500 to 3625 cGy in 5 fractions. A minority (27%) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which was used for gland size downsizing in only 10% of cases. Nearly half (45%) were taking GU medications for urinary dysfunction before RT. Median toxicity FU was 4.0 years. Two-year rates of grade 1+ genitourinary (GU), grade 1+ gastrointestinal (GI), and grade 2+ GU toxicity were 43.5%, 15.9%, and 30.4%, respectively. Total grade 3 GU toxicities were very limited (2.8%). There were no grade 3 GI toxicities. On logistic regression analysis, pretreatment use of GU medications was significantly associated with increased rate of grade 2+ GU toxicity (odds ratio, 3.19; P = .024). Furthermore, PV (analyzed as a continuous variable) did not have an effect on toxicity, quality of life, or oncologic outcomes.
With early FU, ultra large prostate glands do not portend increased risk of high-grade toxicity after SBRT but likely carry an elevated risk of low-grade GU toxicity.
历史上,接受放射治疗(尤其是近距离放射治疗)的大前列腺患者存在毒性问题。人们怀疑这种风险是否会扩展到立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)。在这项回顾性研究中,我们检查了用 SBRT 根治性治疗前列腺体积≥100cc 的患者的临床结果。
我们回顾性地分析了一个大型机构数据库,以确定前列腺体积≥100cc 且接受根治性机器人 SBRT 的组织学确诊局限性前列腺癌患者。通过治疗计划磁共振成像确定前列腺体积(PV)。使用不良事件常用术语标准,第 5.0 版测量毒性。许多患者接受了扩展前列腺癌指数综合生活质量问卷。最低随访(FU)时间为 2 年。
确定了 71 名前列腺体积≥100cc 的患者。大多数患者为 GG1 或 GG2 级疾病(分别为 41%和 37%)。所有患者接受 3500 至 3625cGy 的 5 个分次总剂量。少数(27%)患者接受了雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT),仅 10%的病例中 ADT 用于缩小腺体体积。近一半(45%)患者在 RT 前因尿功能障碍而服用 GU 药物。中位毒性 FU 时间为 4.0 年。2 年时,1+级泌尿生殖系统(GU)、1+级胃肠道(GI)和 2+级 GU 毒性的发生率分别为 43.5%、15.9%和 30.4%。总 3 级 GU 毒性非常有限(2.8%)。没有 3 级 GI 毒性。在逻辑回归分析中,治疗前使用 GU 药物与 2+级 GU 毒性发生率增加显著相关(优势比,3.19;P=0.024)。此外,PV(作为连续变量分析)对毒性、生活质量或肿瘤学结果没有影响。
在早期 FU 时,超大型前列腺不会增加 SBRT 后高等级毒性的风险,但可能会增加低等级 GU 毒性的风险。