• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非增强计算机断层扫描参数在预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石病例结局中的作用:一项荟萃分析。

Role of Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters in Predicting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Stones Cases: A Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Bangli General Hospital, Bangli, Indonesia (K.O.).

Regional Public Hospital dr.M. Thomsen Nias, Gunungsitoli, Indonesia (W.J.).

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2024 Aug;31(8):3282-3296. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.021
PMID:37985292
Abstract

RATIONALE

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is widely considered the primary approach for managing urinary tract stones. This study aimed to assess the predictive factors associated with non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT)-based parameters of upper urinary stones in relation to the outcomes of ESWL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify all relevant studies published up to June 3, 2023. Several NCCT-based parameters to predict ESWL outcomes, comprised of mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone size, were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager software.

RESULTS

Out of 979 publications screened, a total of 39 publications, involving 7869 patients, were enrolled in the analysis. The pooled estimate demonstrated significant differences between MSD, and stone size between successful and failure of stone fragmentation groups, in which lower values of these parameters are associated with successful ESWL outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results from the current study suggested that lower NCCT parameters, notably MSD, SSD, and stone size, are significantly associated with successful ESWL outcome. However, additional large-scale prospective studies are required to utilize these parameters effectively, and the optimal cutoff value should be determined.

摘要

背景

体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)被广泛认为是治疗尿路结石的主要方法。本研究旨在评估与 ESWL 结果相关的基于非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)的上尿路结石参数的预测因素。

材料与方法

系统检索了 PubMed、ScienceDirect、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 中截至 2023 年 6 月 3 日发表的所有相关研究。提取并使用 Review Manager 软件分析了几个基于 NCCT 的参数,包括平均结石密度(MSD)、皮肤到结石距离(SSD)和结石大小,以预测 ESWL 结果。

结果

在筛选出的 979 篇文献中,共有 39 篇文献,涉及 7869 名患者,被纳入分析。汇总估计显示,MSD 和结石大小在碎石成功组和失败组之间存在显著差异,这些参数值越低与 ESWL 成功结果相关。

结论

本研究结果表明,较低的 NCCT 参数,特别是 MSD、SSD 和结石大小,与 ESWL 成功结果显著相关。然而,需要进行更多的大型前瞻性研究来有效利用这些参数,并确定最佳的临界值。

相似文献

1
Role of Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters in Predicting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Stones Cases: A Meta-analysis.非增强计算机断层扫描参数在预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石病例结局中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Aug;31(8):3282-3296. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
2
Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy.预测冲击波碎石术后肾结石结局的非增强计算机断层扫描因素。
Clin Imaging. 2015 Sep-Oct;39(5):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
3
Noncontrast computed tomography factors predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes in patients with pancreatic duct stones.预测胰腺管结石患者体外冲击波碎石术结果的非对比计算机断层扫描因素。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Dec;43(12):3367-3373. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1639-4.
4
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
5
Can we successfully predict the outcome for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for medium size renal stones? A single-center experience.我们能否成功预测体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗中等大小肾结石的结果?单中心经验。
Urologia. 2022 May;89(2):235-239. doi: 10.1177/03915603211016355. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
Success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy based on CT texture analysis.基于 CT 纹理分析的体外冲击波碎石术的疗效。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14823. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14823. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
8
Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics.基于患者和结石计算机断层扫描特征的肾结石冲击波碎石术成功率
Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1043-6; discussion 1046-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.074.
9
Variation coefficient of stone density and renal cortical thickness: the parameters evaluating non-contrast computed tomography imaging for predict extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success.结石密度和肾皮质厚度的变异系数:评估非增强 CT 成像预测体外冲击波碎石术成功的参数。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01561-8.
10
Optimal Skin-to-Stone Distance Is a Positive Predictor for Successful Outcomes in Upper Ureter Calculi following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach.最佳皮肤至结石距离是体外冲击波碎石术后上尿路结石成功治疗结果的阳性预测指标:一种贝叶斯模型平均法
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0144912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144912. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
RIRS with FV-UAS vs. ESWL for the management of 1-2 cm lower pole renal calculi in obese patients: a prospective study.肥胖患者中,输尿管软镜联合钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗1-2厘米下极肾结石的前瞻性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 30;11:1464491. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1464491. eCollection 2024.