• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结石密度和肾皮质厚度的变异系数:评估非增强 CT 成像预测体外冲击波碎石术成功的参数。

Variation coefficient of stone density and renal cortical thickness: the parameters evaluating non-contrast computed tomography imaging for predict extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01561-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-024-01561-8
PMID:38564004
Abstract

The stone density (SD) is not the same in all parts of the stone due to the heterogeneous nature of the stone and the shock wave (SW) passes through tissues of many different densities until it reaches the stone. These factors affect the success of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). We aimed to evaluate the effect of the Variation Coefficient of Stone Density (VCSD) and Renal Cortical Tickness (RCT) on the success of ESWL. Between 2020 and 2023, 510 patients who underwent ESWL were divided into 2 groups treatment success (n:304) and treatment failure (n:206). Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) imaging values of hydronephrosis degree of the kidney, stone location, stone volume (SV), stone-skin distance (SSD), SD, Standard deviation of Stone Density (SDSD), VCSD, RCT, Soft-Tissue Thickness (STT), Muscle Thickness (MT) were analyzed. VCSD value was obtained by dividing SDSD by SD. Along the SW, tissues were divided into three components: kidney (renal cortex), muscle and other soft tissues. RCT, MT and SSD were measured at three different angles (0°, 45°, and 90°) and these 3 lengths were averaged. In univariate analysis, Body Mass Index (BMI), SV, SD, VCSD, SSD, RCT and STT were demonstrated to affect ESWL success. In multivariate analysis, low BMI, SV, SD, RCT and large VCSD were significant independent predictors of ESWL success. Among these parameters, VCSD had the highest prediction accuracy, followed by SD, SV, RCT and BMI, respectively. This study demonstrated that VCSD value and RCT are predictive parameters in determining the treatment of patients with urinary calculi and selecting suitable ESWL candidates.

摘要

由于结石的不均匀性质以及冲击波 (SW) 穿过许多不同密度的组织,直到到达结石,因此结石的密度 (SD) 在结石的不同部位并不相同。这些因素会影响体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 的成功率。我们旨在评估结石密度变异系数 (VCSD) 和肾皮质厚度 (RCT) 对 ESWL 成功率的影响。2020 年至 2023 年间,对 510 例接受 ESWL 的患者进行了分组,根据治疗效果分为成功组(n:304)和失败组(n:206)。分析了肾结石积水程度、结石位置、结石体积 (SV)、结石-皮肤距离 (SSD)、SD、结石密度标准差 (SDSD)、VCSD、RCT、软组织厚度 (STT)、肌肉厚度 (MT) 的非对比计算机断层扫描 (NCCT) 影像值。通过将 SDSD 除以 SD 获得 VCSD 值。沿着 SW,组织被分为三个部分:肾脏(肾皮质)、肌肉和其他软组织。RCT、MT 和 SSD 在三个不同角度(0°、45°和 90°)进行测量,并取这 3 个长度的平均值。在单变量分析中,BMI、SV、SD、VCSD、SSD、RCT 和 STT 均显示影响 ESWL 成功率。在多变量分析中,低 BMI、SV、SD、RCT 和大 VCSD 是 ESWL 成功的独立预测因子。在这些参数中,VCSD 的预测准确率最高,其次是 SD、SV、RCT 和 BMI。本研究表明,VCSD 值和 RCT 是确定患者尿路结石治疗和选择合适 ESWL 候选者的预测参数。

相似文献

1
Variation coefficient of stone density and renal cortical thickness: the parameters evaluating non-contrast computed tomography imaging for predict extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success.结石密度和肾皮质厚度的变异系数:评估非增强 CT 成像预测体外冲击波碎石术成功的参数。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01561-8.
2
The effect of renal cortical thickness on the treatment outcomes of kidney stones treated with shockwave lithotripsy.肾皮质厚度对冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石疗效的影响。
Korean J Urol. 2015 May;56(5):379-85. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.5.379. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
3
Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy.预测冲击波碎石术后肾结石结局的非增强计算机断层扫描因素。
Clin Imaging. 2015 Sep-Oct;39(5):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
4
Quantitative factors of unenhanced CT for predicting fragmenting efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on pancreatic duct stones.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗胰管结石碎裂效果的 CT 平扫定量因素。
Clin Radiol. 2019 May;74(5):408.e1-408.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
5
Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石:CT 纹理分析技术能否帮助预测疗效?
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Can we successfully predict the outcome for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for medium size renal stones? A single-center experience.我们能否成功预测体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗中等大小肾结石的结果?单中心经验。
Urologia. 2022 May;89(2):235-239. doi: 10.1177/03915603211016355. Epub 2021 May 13.
7
Variation Coefficient of Stone Density: A Novel Predictor of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.结石密度变异系数:体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的一种新型预测指标。
J Endourol. 2017 Apr;31(4):384-390. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0719. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Role of Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters in Predicting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Stones Cases: A Meta-analysis.非增强计算机断层扫描参数在预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石病例结局中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Aug;31(8):3282-3296. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
9
Success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy based on CT texture analysis.基于 CT 纹理分析的体外冲击波碎石术的疗效。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14823. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14823. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
10
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Finding the optimal candidate for shock wave lithotripsy: external validation and comparison of five prediction models.寻找冲击波碎石术的最佳候选者:五个预测模型的外部验证和比较。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 7;51(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01444-4.
2
Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.Hounsfield 单位在预测冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石结局中的作用:系统评价结果。
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr;24(4):173-185. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
3
Renal stone density on native CT-scan as a predictor of treatment outcomes in shock wave lithotripsy.
平扫 CT 肾石密度预测冲击波碎石术治疗结果。
J Med Life. 2022 Dec;15(12):1579-1584. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0153.
4
Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022.最佳介入性尿路结石管理实践:2022 年欧洲泌尿外科学会尿路结石指南专家组更新。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jan;9(1):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
5
The usefulness of the Hounsfield unit and stone heterogeneity variation in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome.亨氏单位和结石异质性变化在预测体外冲击波碎石术结果中的作用。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 May;28(3):187-192. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20945.
6
Factors influencing stone-free rate of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL); a cohort study.影响体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)结石清除率的因素:一项队列研究。
Scand J Urol. 2022 Jun;56(3):237-243. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2055137. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
7
A prospective observational study on the predictability of Triple-D score versus Quadruple-D score in the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones 1-2 cm in diameter.一项关于直径1-2厘米肾结石体外冲击波碎石成功率中三联D评分与四联D评分预测性的前瞻性观察研究。
Urol Ann. 2022 Jan-Mar;14(1):37-42. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_1_21. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
8
A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.一种利用计算机断层扫描参数预测不同部位输尿管结石碎石术成功的新模型。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Mar;46(2):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
9
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: current knowledge and future perspectives.体外冲击波碎石术:当前认知与未来展望。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Aug;71(4):365-372. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03415-5. Epub 2019 May 7.
10
Reinforcement of the Triple D score with simple addition of the intrarenal location for the prediction of the stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones 10-20 mm in diameter.通过简单增加肾内位置来强化三联D评分,以预测直径为10至20毫米的肾结石冲击波碎石术后的无石率。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Feb;51(2):239-245. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-02066-1. Epub 2019 Jan 2.