Department of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, 100 Wiegand, Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Food Experience and Sensory Testing (Feast) Lab, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, Wanganui-Manawatu 4410, New Zealand.
Food Res Int. 2023 Dec;174(Pt 1):113496. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113496. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
Tropical fruit aromas are prominent in many white wines. The purpose of this work was to determine if winemaking practices could impact the tropical fruit aromas in the Chardonnay wines and how those aroma differences influenced wine consumers acceptance and emotional responses. Four treatments were tested at varying fermentation temperature gradients and skin contact times: control fermentation at 13 °C with no skin contact (Control), fermentation at 13 °C with 18 h of skin contact (SC), fermentation temperature gradient by time (20 °C for 4 days then reduced to 13 °C) with no skin contact (FG), fermentation temperature gradient by time with 18 h of skin contact (SCFG). Acceptance, using a 7-point hedonic scale, showed there was not a significant difference between treatments. Emotional response, using a 5-point Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) scale, showed significant differences for 'calm' and 'disgusted' emotions. Check-all-that-apply (CATA) for aroma descriptors showed that Control is described using aromas of passionfruit, lychee, and pome fruit; SC had aromas of grapefruit and floral; FG was described as having melon, lychee, and pineapple aromas; and SCFG was described with aromas of lemon/lime, mango, and guava. Positive emotions were associated with fruity aromas in the wines, although no difference in acceptance was found. Winemaking treatments impacted the aroma profile of chardonnay wine, with tropical aromas evoking positive emotions in consumers. The relationship between specific aromas and consumers emotion responses can be an important tool to understand the factors behind a wine's success or lack thereof. Moreover, it can help with the creation of new wine products.
许多白葡萄酒都具有浓郁的热带水果香气。本研究旨在确定酿酒工艺是否会影响霞多丽葡萄酒中的热带水果香气,以及这些香气差异如何影响葡萄酒消费者的接受度和情感反应。本研究测试了四种不同的处理方法,分别为:在不同发酵温度梯度和果皮接触时间下进行控制发酵(13°C 且无果皮接触,记为 Control)、在 13°C 下进行发酵并保持 18 小时果皮接触(记为 SC)、采用时间梯度发酵(4 天内 20°C,然后降至 13°C)且无果皮接触(记为 FG)、采用时间梯度发酵并保持 18 小时果皮接触(记为 SCFG)。采用 7 分愉悦度量表评估消费者对葡萄酒的接受度,结果表明不同处理方法之间没有显著差异。采用 5 分 RATA 量表评估消费者的情感反应,结果表明“平静”和“厌恶”情绪有显著差异。使用 CATA 评估香气描述词,结果表明 Control 具有百香果、荔枝和梨的香气,SC 具有葡萄柚和花香,FG 具有甜瓜、荔枝和菠萝的香气,SCFG 具有柠檬/酸橙、芒果和番石榴的香气。尽管消费者对葡萄酒的接受度没有差异,但果香可以引起积极的情感。酿酒处理方法影响霞多丽葡萄酒的香气特征,热带香气可以引起消费者的积极情感。特定香气与消费者情感反应之间的关系可以成为理解葡萄酒成功或失败背后因素的重要工具,同时也可以帮助开发新的葡萄酒产品。