Suppr超能文献

眼科社交媒体帖子对网络内容可访问性指南的遵循情况。

Compliance with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in Ophthalmology Social Media Posts.

作者信息

Sharma Meghan, Shah Serena, Gil Alexandra, Huertas Laura, Bitrian Elena, Chang Ta Chen Peter

机构信息

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.

Florida International University.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2023 Nov 8:rs.3.rs-3565120. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3565120/v1.

Abstract

This is a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available Internet data to examine compliance to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) on patient education social media posts in ophthalmology. WCAG ensures web content accessibility for those with disabilities (including visual impairment). Social media posts were sampled from 10 ophthalmology patient education social media pages and 10 non-ophthalmology (cardiopulmonary) pages as the comparison group. Three independent reviewers graded the selected posts based on the WebAIM© WCAG 2 checklist adapted for social media posts. Validated accessibility standard labels: "0" for not meeting any standards, "1" for meeting bare minimum accessibility requirements, "2" for meeting legal accessibility requirements, or "3" for exceeding accessibility requirements. There were no significant differences between ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology posts in receiving high vs. low WCAG grades. 49% of ratings for ophthalmology social media posts showed no compliance with any WCAG. The most common reasons that ophthalmology posts failed to meet criteria were due to color and contrast issues (38.9%). Most ophthalmology social media posts had low WCAG scores, indicating poor compliance to WCAG. Because social media is highly visual, reduced compliance to WCAG may create barriers for low vision individuals to successfully access patient education social media content.

摘要

这是一项对公开可用互联网数据的横断面分析,旨在研究眼科患者教育社交媒体帖子对网络内容无障碍指南(WCAG)的遵守情况。WCAG确保了残障人士(包括视力障碍者)能够访问网络内容。从10个眼科患者教育社交媒体页面和10个非眼科(心肺科)页面抽取社交媒体帖子作为对照组。三名独立评审员根据适用于社交媒体帖子的WebAIM© WCAG 2检查表对所选帖子进行评分。经过验证的无障碍标准标签:“0”表示未达到任何标准,“1”表示达到最低无障碍要求,“2”表示达到法定无障碍要求,“3”表示超过无障碍要求。眼科和非眼科帖子在获得高WCAG等级与低WCAG等级方面没有显著差异。眼科社交媒体帖子的评级中有49%显示未符合任何WCAG标准。眼科帖子未达标准的最常见原因是颜色和对比度问题(38.9%)。大多数眼科社交媒体帖子的WCAG得分较低,表明对WCAG的遵守情况较差。由于社交媒体具有高度视觉性,对WCAG的低遵守率可能会给低视力个体成功访问患者教育社交媒体内容造成障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9673/10659549/b4dfc140f8f9/nihpp-rs3565120v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验