Huang Andy S, Abdullah Ali Adel Ne'ma, Chen Kelsey, Zhu Dagny
Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
St Helier Hospital, Sutton, London, UK.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 8;16:685-694. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S353417. eCollection 2022.
Social media has become a popular source of health information for patients. This study aimed to characterize the top-performing ophthalmologic posts on a large social media platform to better understand the spread of ophthalmic information via social media.
This was a web-based study that searched for ophthalmology-related posts on Instagram, with subjects being users who posted ophthalmic content. A list of 36 ophthalmology-related hashtags, including the most common diagnoses and procedures identified from the IRIS Registry, was queried. For each hashtag, data were collected for "Top 9 posts" (as ranked by Instagram's engagement-based algorithm) at three different time points. Posts were analyzed for the poster's background, credentials, post format, content, caption length, and engagement level.
Of the top-performing posts analyzed (n = 972), the most frequent post format was a photo (82.2%), followed by video (8.8%) and graphic (8.4%). Ophthalmologists (35.8%) authored the highest number of posts, followed by patients (27.1%), optometrists (20.1%), and organizations (12.7%). The highest average engagement level ratios (ELRs) belonged to ophthalmologists-in-training (0.096), followed by patients (0.084), optometrists (0.070), all ophthalmologists (0.067) and organizations (0.051); p < 0.001. The most engaging type of content was self-promotional (0.118) and personal experience-related (0.091); educational content was the least engaging (0.059) even though it comprised the majority of posts (56%); (p < 0.001). Characteristics that predicted the highest ELRs (reaching 80th percentile) were captions and/or images that featured personal experiences (3.335 OR), whitecoats (3.259), and those authored by ophthalmologist trainees (3.172); (p < 0.01). The least engaging were those featuring fundus photos (0.281), educational content (0.359), and authored by organizations (0.428); (p < 0.05).
The majority of ophthalmologic content on Instagram is authored by non-ophthalmologists, with educational content being the least engaging. Practicing ophthalmologists have an opportunity to reach more patients through social media by incorporating specific features known to drive post engagement and reach.
Social media has become a popular source of health information for patients. Our study demonstrates that the majority of ophthalmology content on Instagram is authored by non- ophthalmologists, with educational content being the least engaging. Practicing ophthalmologists have an opportunity to reach a wider audience through social media by incorporating specific features known to drive post engagement and reach.
社交媒体已成为患者获取健康信息的流行来源。本研究旨在对一个大型社交媒体平台上表现最佳的眼科帖子进行特征描述,以更好地了解眼科信息通过社交媒体的传播情况。
这是一项基于网络的研究,在照片墙(Instagram)上搜索与眼科相关的帖子,研究对象为发布眼科内容的用户。查询了一份包含36个与眼科相关的主题标签列表,这些标签包括从虹膜注册中心识别出的最常见诊断和手术。对于每个主题标签,在三个不同时间点收集“热门9帖”(根据照片墙基于参与度的算法排名)的数据。对帖子的发布者背景、资质、帖子格式、内容、说明文字长度和参与度水平进行分析。
在分析的表现最佳的帖子中(n = 972),最常见的帖子格式是照片(82.2%),其次是视频(8.8%)和图表(8.4%)。眼科医生撰写的帖子数量最多(35.8%),其次是患者(27.1%)、验光师(20.1%)和组织(12.7%)。平均参与度水平比率(ELR)最高的是眼科住院医生(0.096),其次是患者(0.084)、验光师(0.070)、所有眼科医生(0.067)和组织(0.051);p < 0.001。最具吸引力的内容类型是自我宣传类(0.118)和个人经验相关类(0.091);教育内容的吸引力最小(0.059),尽管它占帖子的大多数(56%);(p < 0.001)。预测最高ELR(达到第80百分位数)的特征是具有个人经验的说明文字和/或图片(优势比3.335)、白大褂形象(3.259)以及由眼科住院医生撰写的内容(3.172);(p < 0.01)。吸引力最小的是那些包含眼底照片的内容(0.281)、教育内容(0.359)以及由组织撰写的内容(0.428);(p < 0.05)。
照片墙上的大多数眼科内容是由非眼科医生撰写的,教育内容的吸引力最小。执业眼科医生有机会通过社交媒体接触更多患者,方法是融入已知能推动帖子参与度和传播范围的特定特征。
社交媒体已成为患者获取健康信息的流行来源。我们的研究表明,照片墙上的大多数眼科内容是由非眼科医生撰写的,教育内容的吸引力最小。执业眼科医生有机会通过社交媒体接触更广泛的受众,方法是融入已知能推动帖子参与度和传播范围的特定特征。