Li Yicheng, Zhang Xiaogang, Cao Li, Sun Yongqiang, Ye Ye, Xie Jie, Hu Yihe, Li Zhong, Tang Bensen
Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi Xinjiang, 830054, P. R. China.
Department of Orthopedics, Luoyang Orthropedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou Henan, 450016, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 15;37(11):1326-1334. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202307078.
To investigate the accuracy, safety, and short-term effectiveness of a domestic robot-assisted system in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Between December 2021 and February 2023, 138 patients with knee osteoarthritis who received TKA in 5 clinical centers were prospectively collected, and 134 patients met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either a trial group ( =68) or a control group ( =66). Seven patients had lost follow-up and missing data, so they were excluded and the remaining 127 patients were included for analysis, including 66 patients in the trial group and 61 patients in the control group. There was no significant difference ( >0.05) in gender, age, body mass index, side, duration of osteoarthritis, Kellgren-Lawrence grading, preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between the two groups. The trial group completed the TKA by domestic robot-assisted osteotomy according to the preoperative CT-based surgical planning. The control group was performed by traditional osteotomy plate combined with soft tissue release. Total operation time, osteotomy time of femoral/tibial side, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The radiographs were taken at 5 and 90 days after operation, and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal angle of femur (LDFA), and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were measured. The difference between the measured values of the above indexes at two time points after operation and the preoperative planning target values was calculated, and the absolute value (absolute error) was taken for comparison between the two groups. The postoperative recovery of lower limb alignment was judged and the accuracy was calculated. KSS score and WOMAC score were used to evaluate the knee joint function of patients before operation and at 90 days after operation. The improvement rates of KSS score and WOMAC score were calculated. The function, stability, and convenience of the robot-assisted system were evaluated by the surgeons.
The total operation time and femoral osteotomy time of the trial group were significantly longer than those of the control group ( <0.05). There was no significant difference in the tibial osteotomy time and the amount of intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( 0.05). The incisions of both groups healed by first intention after operation, and there was no infection around the prosthesis. Nine patients in the trial group and 8 in the control group developed lower extremity vascular thrombosis, all of which were calf intermuscular venous thrombosis, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications ( >0.05). All patients were followed up 90 days. There was no significant difference in KSS score and WOMAC score between the two groups at 90 days after operation ( >0.05). There was significant difference in the improvement rate of KSS score between the two groups ( <0.05), while there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of WOMAC score between the two groups ( >0.05). Radiological results showed that the absolute errors of HKA and LDFA in the trial group were significantly smaller than those in the control group at 5 and 90 days after operation ( <0.05), and the recovery accuracy of lower limb alignment was significantly higher than that in control group ( <0.05). The absolute error of PTS in the trial group was significantly smaller than that in the control group at 5 days after operation ( <0.05), but there was no significant difference at 90 days between the two groups ( >0.05). The functional satisfaction rate of the robot-assisted system was 98.5% (65/66), and the satisfaction rates of stability and convenience were 100% (66/66).
Domestic robot-assisted TKA is a safe and effective surgical treatment for knee osteoarthritis, which can achieve favorable lower limb alignment reconstruction, precise implant of prosthesis, and satisfactory functional recovery.
通过多中心随机对照试验,探讨国产机器人辅助系统在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的准确性、安全性及短期有效性。
2021年12月至2023年2月,前瞻性收集5个临床中心行TKA的138例膝骨关节炎患者,将符合纳入标准的134例患者随机分为试验组(n = 68)和对照组(n = 66)。7例患者失访及数据缺失,予以排除,最终纳入127例患者进行分析,其中试验组66例,对照组61例。两组患者在性别、年龄、体重指数、患侧、骨关节炎病程、Kellgren-Lawrence分级、术前膝关节协会评分(KSS)及西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分方面差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。试验组根据术前基于CT的手术规划,采用国产机器人辅助截骨完成TKA。对照组采用传统截骨板联合软组织松解进行手术。记录并比较两组患者的总手术时间、股骨/胫骨侧截骨时间、术中失血量及术后并发症。分别于术后5天和90天拍摄X线片,测量髋-膝-踝角(HKA)、股骨远端外侧角(LDFA)及胫骨后倾角(PTS)。计算术后两个时间点上述指标测量值与术前规划目标值的差值,并取绝对值(绝对误差)进行两组间比较。判断下肢力线的术后恢复情况并计算准确性。采用KSS评分和WOMAC评分评估患者术前及术后90天的膝关节功能。计算KSS评分和WOMAC评分的改善率。由外科医生对机器人辅助系统的功能、稳定性及便利性进行评估。
试验组的总手术时间和股骨截骨时间显著长于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组胫骨截骨时间及术中失血量差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组手术切口均一期愈合,假体周围无感染。试验组9例、对照组8例发生下肢血管血栓形成,均为小腿肌间静脉血栓,并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。所有患者均随访90天。术后90天两组KSS评分和WOMAC评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组KSS评分改善率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),而两组WOMAC评分改善率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。影像学结果显示,术后5天和90天试验组HKA和LDFA的绝对误差均显著小于对照组(P < 0.05),下肢力线恢复准确性显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。术后5天试验组PTS的绝对误差显著小于对照组(P < 0.05),但术后90天两组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。机器人辅助系统的功能满意度为98.5%(65/66),稳定性和便利性满意度均为100%(66/66)。
国产机器人辅助TKA是治疗膝骨关节炎安全有效的手术方法,可实现良好的下肢力线重建、假体精准植入及满意的功能恢复。