Suppr超能文献

稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病长期大环内酯类药物治疗的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

The Effectiveness and Safety of Long-Term Macrolide Therapy for COPD in Stable Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Nakamura Kazunori, Fujita Yukio, Chen Hao, Somekawa Kohei, Kashizaki Fumihiro, Koizumi Harumi, Takahashi Kenichi, Horita Nobuyuki, Hara Yu, Muro Shigeo, Kaneko Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto 861-4193, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.

出版信息

Diseases. 2023 Oct 27;11(4):152. doi: 10.3390/diseases11040152.

Abstract

: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent condition with fewer treatments available as the severity increases. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated the benefits of long-term macrolide use. However, the therapeutic differences between different macrolides and the optimal duration of use remain unclear. : A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness of long-term macrolide use in reducing COPD exacerbations, compare the therapeutic differences among macrolides, and determine the appropriate treatment duration. Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ICHU-SHI) were searched until 20 March 2023, and a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect. : The meta-analysis included nine randomized controlled trials involving 1965 patients. The analysis revealed an odds ratio (OR) of 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19, 0.59, < 0.001) for the reduction in exacerbation frequency. Notably, only azithromycin or erythromycin showed suppression of COPD exacerbations. The ORs for reducing exacerbation frequency per year and preventing hospitalizations were -0.50 (95% CI: -0.81, -0.19; = 0.001) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.3, 0.97; = 0.04), respectively. Statistical analyses showed no significant differences between three- and six-month macrolide prescriptions. However, studies involving a twelve-month prescription showed an OR of 0.27 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.68; = 0.005; I = 81%). Although a significant improvement in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores was observed with a mean difference of -4.42 (95% CI: -9.0, 0.16; = 0.06; I = 94%), the minimal clinically important difference was not reached. While no adverse effects were observed between the two groups, several studies have reported an increase in bacterial resistance. : Long-term use of azithromycin or erythromycin suppresses COPD exacerbations, and previous studies have supported the advantages of a 12-month macrolide prescription over a placebo.

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种常见疾病,随着病情加重,可用的治疗方法越来越少。以往的系统评价已证明长期使用大环内酯类药物的益处。然而,不同大环内酯类药物之间的治疗差异以及最佳使用时长仍不明确。

进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估长期使用大环内酯类药物在减少COPD急性加重方面的有效性,比较大环内酯类药物之间的治疗差异,并确定合适的治疗时长。检索了四个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和医中志)直至2023年3月20日,并使用随机效应模型计算合并效应。

该荟萃分析纳入了9项涉及1965例患者的随机对照试验。分析显示,急性加重频率降低的比值比(OR)为0.34(95%置信区间[CI]为0.19,0.59,<0.001)。值得注意的是,只有阿奇霉素或红霉素显示出对COPD急性加重的抑制作用。每年降低急性加重频率和预防住院的OR分别为-0.50(95%CI:-0.81,-0.19;P=0.001)和0.60(95%CI:0.3,0.97;P=0.04)。统计分析显示,大环内酯类药物三个月和六个月处方之间无显著差异。然而,涉及十二个月处方的研究显示OR为0.27(95%CI:0.11,0.68;P=0.005;I²=81%)。尽管圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)总分有显著改善,平均差值为-4.42(95%CI:-9.0,0.16;P=0.06;I²=94%),但未达到最小临床重要差异。虽然两组之间未观察到不良反应,但多项研究报告了细菌耐药性增加。

长期使用阿奇霉素或红霉素可抑制COPD急性加重,并且以往的研究支持12个月大环内酯类药物处方优于安慰剂的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3d/10660475/18c6e207bcec/diseases-11-00152-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验