Braddick O J, Atkinson J, Wattam-Bell J R
Vision Res. 1986;26(8):1223-39. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90103-3.
The ability to discriminate grating patterns, containing the same spatial frequency components but in different phase relationships, has been studied in infants by comparing looking times following habituation to one pattern. The performance of 1-month-olds was compared with that of 2/3-month-old infants. Both age groups could discriminate a set of components in square-wave-phase (fundamental 0.18 c/deg) from components of the same amplitude combined in random phase. However, these compounds differ in peak-to-trough contrast, which infants of both ages could discriminate even for a constant waveform. When contrast was randomized from presentation to presentation, the older group still demonstrated discrimination, implying that they were sensitive to the pattern differences, but the younger group did not. The younger group also failed to demonstrate discrimination between the two waveforms when they were of fixed, matched, peak-to-trough contrast, indicating that the previous absence of discrimination was not simply due to distraction by the contrast variations. We conclude that 1-month-olds are insensitive to the configuration of these compound grating patterns even when they are capable of detecting their components. This loss of spatial information has some analogies with adult peripheral and amblyopic vision. Like other aspects of vision, it shows striking development between 1 and 3 months of age.
通过比较婴儿对一种图案习惯化后的注视时间,研究了他们辨别包含相同空间频率成分但相位关系不同的光栅图案的能力。将1个月大婴儿的表现与2/3个月大婴儿的表现进行了比较。两个年龄组都能够区分方波相位(基频0.18周/度)中的一组成分与随机相位组合的相同幅度的成分。然而,这些复合物在峰谷对比度上有所不同,两个年龄组的婴儿即使对于恒定波形也能区分。当每次呈现时对比度随机化时,较大的年龄组仍然表现出辨别能力,这意味着他们对图案差异敏感,但较小的年龄组则没有。当两个波形具有固定的、匹配的峰谷对比度时,较小的年龄组也未能表现出对它们的辨别能力,这表明之前缺乏辨别能力不仅仅是由于对比度变化的干扰。我们得出结论,1个月大的婴儿对这些复合光栅图案的配置不敏感,即使他们能够检测到其成分。这种空间信息的丧失与成人的周边视觉和弱视有一些相似之处。与视觉的其他方面一样,它在1至3个月大时表现出显著的发展。