Is there a promoting role for artificial sweeteners in the evolution of bladder cancer? A meta-analysis of current literature.

INTRODUCTION

Urinary bladder cancer is a frequent neoplasia in the urogenital system. Ageing and smoking are the two main risk factors, however, some chemical agents such as artificial sweeteners could act as initiators or promoters.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

After identifying trends in scientific literature, we conducted a wide search in PubMed database and a meta-analysis was performed on extracted data to determine the role of artificial sweeteners in the development of urinary bladder cancer.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty-one full reports were enrolled from screening of PubMed database into final analysis involving 116,568 subjects in comparisons. Overall, 13,682 and 102,886 cases were identified for bladder cancer patients and healthy controls, respectively. Among artificial sweetener users, 12.5% was the incidence of bladder cancer. In the control group, 11.2% of cases suffered from urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. About 40.7% of the patients suffering from urinary neoplasms and 37.8% of the healthy cases were artificial sweetener users, respectively. There were only minor differences in overall descriptive data. The incidence of urinary bladder cancer among artificial sweetener users and control cases showed no risk difference (RD: 0.00, CI: -0.06 to 0.06). The frequency of artificial sweetener use among patients suffering from urinary bladder neoplasms and healthy subjects was compared which showed equal occurrences (OR: 0.96, CI: 0.79 to 1.17).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, the carcinogenic risk of artificial sweeteners is not proven. Saccharin should not be kept as a promoter in urothelial malignant transformation.