Greenberg R S, Liff J M, Gregory H R, Brockman J E
Yale J Biol Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;59(5):497-504.
The purpose of this study was to assess the possible bias that may occur in case-control studies when exposure information is not collected from all potentially eligible cases. The data used in this study were collected in the metropolitan area of Atlanta as part of a multicenter, population-based, case-control study of oropharyngeal cancer. In-person interviews were conducted with 112 cases (67.9 percent) and information on an additional 23 ill or deceased cases (13.9 percent) was collected through surrogate respondents. The cases about whom information was collected from surrogate respondents had more advanced disease at the time of diagnosis and were more likely to be black and less educated than cases who were interviewed in person. Cigarette smoking and consumption of hard liquor were more common among the cases about whom information was collected through surrogates. Therefore, failure to include such information would have resulted in underestimates of the strength of association between these exposures and the risk of oropharyngeal cancer.
本研究的目的是评估在病例对照研究中,当未从所有潜在符合条件的病例收集暴露信息时可能出现的偏差。本研究使用的数据是在亚特兰大大都市区收集的,作为一项基于人群的多中心口咽癌病例对照研究的一部分。对112例病例(67.9%)进行了面对面访谈,并通过替代受访者收集了另外23例患病或死亡病例(13.9%)的信息。通过替代受访者收集信息的病例在诊断时疾病进展更严重,与接受面对面访谈的病例相比,更有可能是黑人且受教育程度更低。通过替代受访者收集信息的病例中,吸烟和饮用烈性酒更为常见。因此,未纳入此类信息会导致低估这些暴露与口咽癌风险之间的关联强度。