Suppr超能文献

比较阿柏西普和雷珠单抗治疗伴有视网膜色素上皮脱离的年龄相关性黄斑变性的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of aflibercept and ranibizumab in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration with retinal pigment epithelial detachment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang Province, China.

Yuncheng Central Hospital, Yuncheng City, 044000, Shanxi Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 21;23(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03214-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with retinal pigment epithelial detachment (PED).

METHODS

Systematic review identifying studies comparing intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR), intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal conbercept (IVC) published before Mar 2022.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial and 6 observational studies were selected for meta-analysis (1,069 patients). The change of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in IVA 2.0 mg group was better than IVR 0.5 mg (average difference 0.07) and IVR 2.0 mg (average difference 0.10), the differences were statistically significant. The change of the height of PED in IVA 2.0 group was better than IVR 0.5 group (average difference 45.30), the difference was statistically significant. The proportion of patients without PED at last visit in IVA 2.0 group were better than those in IVR 2.0 group (hazard ratio 1.91), the difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference compared with IVR 0.5 group (hazard ratio 1.45). IVA required fewer injections than IVR, with a mean difference of -1.58.

CONCLUSIONS

IVA appears to be superior to IVR in improvement of BCVA, height decrease of PED and regression of PED with less injections in nAMD with PED.

摘要

目的

评估抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)在治疗伴有视网膜色素上皮脱离(PED)的年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)中的疗效。

方法

系统评价,确定了 2022 年 3 月之前发表的比较玻璃体内雷珠单抗(IVR)、玻璃体内阿柏西普(IVA)和玻璃体内康柏西普(IVC)的研究。

结果

选择了 1 项随机对照试验和 6 项观察性研究进行荟萃分析(共 1069 名患者)。IVA 2.0mg 组最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的变化优于 IVR 0.5mg(平均差异 0.07)和 IVR 2.0mg(平均差异 0.10),差异具有统计学意义。IVA 2.0mg 组 PED 高度的变化优于 IVR 0.5mg 组(平均差异 45.30),差异具有统计学意义。IVA 2.0mg 组最后一次就诊时无 PED 的患者比例优于 IVR 2.0mg 组(风险比 1.91),差异具有统计学意义。与 IVR 0.5mg 组相比,差异无统计学意义(风险比 1.45)。IVA 所需的注射次数少于 IVR,平均差异为-1.58。

结论

IVA 在改善 BCVA、PED 高度降低和 PED 消退方面似乎优于 IVR,在伴有 PED 的 nAMD 中,IVA 注射次数更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验