• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分诊理论。

A theory of triage.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Politics, Media and Philosophy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2024 Feb;38(2):95-106. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13242. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.13242
PMID:37991489
Abstract

This paper provides a general framework for conceptualizing triage for intensive care unit admissions in public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. It applies this framework to some of the guidelines issued during the pandemic and addresses some controversial issues, including the role of age, the use of lives or life years, and the relevance of quality of life considerations. The paper defends a view on which triage protocols for public health emergencies should aim to maximize the number of life years saved, may take into account age as a proxy, and should ignore quality of life considerations.

摘要

本文为在诸如 COVID-19 大流行等公共卫生紧急情况下对 ICU 入院进行分类提供了一个通用框架。它将该框架应用于大流行期间发布的一些指南,并解决了一些有争议的问题,包括年龄的作用、使用生命或生命年,以及生活质量考虑的相关性。本文捍卫了一种观点,即公共卫生紧急情况的分类协议应旨在最大限度地增加挽救的生命年数,可以考虑年龄作为替代指标,并且应该忽略生活质量方面的考虑。

相似文献

1
A theory of triage.分诊理论。
Bioethics. 2024 Feb;38(2):95-106. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13242. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
2
Beyond Individual Triage: Regional Allocation of Life-Saving Resources such as Ventilators in Public Health Emergencies.超越个体分诊:突发公共卫生事件中救命资源(如呼吸机)的区域分配。
Health Care Anal. 2021 Dec;29(4):263-282. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00427-5. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
3
Developing a Triage Protocol for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in a Public Health Emergency.制定COVID-19大流行的分诊方案:在突发公共卫生事件中分配稀缺医疗资源
J Clin Ethics. 2020 Winter;31(4):303-317.
4
Investigating ethical tradeoffs in crisis standards of care through simulation of ventilator allocation protocols.通过模拟呼吸机分配协议来研究危机标准护理中的伦理权衡。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0300951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300951. eCollection 2024.
5
Allocation of scarce critical care resources during public health emergencies: which ethical principles support decision making.公共卫生紧急事件中稀缺重症监护资源的分配:哪些伦理原则支持决策。
Clin Ter. 2022 Jul-Aug;173(4):384-395. doi: 10.7417/CT.2022.2450.
6
Social Justice, Triage, and COVID-19: Ignore Life-years Saved.社会正义、分诊与新冠疫情:忽略挽救的生命年数
Med Care. 2020 Jul;58(7):579-581. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001355.
7
The Value of Triage during Periods of Intense COVID-19 Demand: Simulation Modeling Study.高强度 COVID-19 需求时期的分诊价值:模拟建模研究。
Med Decis Making. 2021 May;41(4):393-407. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21994035. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
Frailty Triage: Is Rationing Intensive Medical Treatment on the Grounds of Frailty Ethical?衰弱甄别:基于衰弱状况对强化医疗进行配给是否合乎伦理?
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Nov;21(11):48-63. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1851809. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Mass critical care: pediatric considerations in extending and rationing care in public health emergencies.群体危重症医学:公共卫生紧急事件中扩展和合理分配医疗资源的儿科考虑因素。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S166-71. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181be6844.
10
Public attitudes toward allocating scarce resources in the COVID-19 pandemic.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源分配的态度。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0240651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240651. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Fair allocation of resources in the moral dilemma of triage.分诊道德困境中的资源公平分配。
Front Sociol. 2025 May 13;10:1570940. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1570940. eCollection 2025.
2
What does "urgency" mean when prioritizing cancer treatment? Results from a qualitative study with German oncologists and other experts during the COVID-19 pandemic.在优先考虑癌症治疗时,“紧迫性”意味着什么?在 COVID-19 大流行期间,德国肿瘤学家和其他专家进行的定性研究结果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;150(7):352. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05863-7.