Faculty of Architecture and City Planning, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Haifa University, Haifa, Israel.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0294664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294664. eCollection 2023.
Questionnaires are among the most basic and widespread tools to assess the mental health of a population in epidemiological and public health studies. Their most obvious advantage (firsthand self-report) is also the source of their main problems: the raw data requires interpretation, and are a snapshot of the specific sample's status at a given time. Efforts to deal with both issues created a bi-dimensional space defined by two orthogonal axes, in which most of the quantitative mental health research can be located. Methods aimed to assure that mental health diagnoses are solidly grounded on existing raw data are part of the individual validity axis. Tools allowing the generalization of the results across the entire population compose the collective validity axis. This paper raises a different question. Since one goal of mental health assessments is to obtain results that can be generalized to some extent, an important question is how robust is a questionnaire result when applied to a different population or to the same population at a different time. In this case, there is deep uncertainty, without any a priori probabilistic information. The main claim of this paper is that this task requires the development of a new robustness to deep uncertainty axis, defining a three-dimensional research space. We demonstrate the analysis of deep uncertainty using the concept of robustness in info-gap decision theory. Based on data from questionnaires collected before and during the Covid-19 pandemic, we first locate a mental health assessment in the space defined by the individual validity axis and the collective validity axis. Then we develop a model of info-gap robustness to uncertainty in mental health assessment, showing how the robustness to deep uncertainty axis interacts with the other two axes, highlighting the contributions and the limitations of this approach. The ability to measure robustness to deep uncertainty in the mental health realm is important particularly in troubled and changing times. In this paper, we provide the basic methodological building blocks of the suggested approach using the outbreak of Covid-19 as a recent example.
问卷是评估人群心理健康的最基本和最广泛的工具之一,尤其在流行病学和公共卫生研究中。它们最明显的优势(第一手自我报告)也是其主要问题的根源:原始数据需要解释,并且只是特定样本在特定时间点的状态快照。为了解决这两个问题,人们努力创建了一个由两个正交轴定义的二维空间,大多数定量心理健康研究都可以在这个空间中找到自己的位置。旨在确保心理健康诊断基于现有原始数据的方法属于个体有效性轴。允许将结果推广到整个人群的工具构成了集体有效性轴。本文提出了一个不同的问题。由于心理健康评估的一个目标是获得在某种程度上可以推广的结果,因此一个重要的问题是,当应用于不同的人群或同一人群的不同时间时,问卷结果的稳健性如何。在这种情况下,存在着深刻的不确定性,没有任何先验概率信息。本文的主要观点是,这项任务需要开发一种新的稳健性来应对深度不确定性轴,从而定义一个三维研究空间。我们使用信息差距决策理论中的稳健性概念来分析深度不确定性。基于在新冠疫情之前和期间收集的问卷数据,我们首先将心理健康评估定位在个体有效性轴和集体有效性轴定义的空间中。然后,我们开发了一种用于心理健康评估不确定性的信息差距稳健性模型,展示了深度不确定性轴与其他两个轴的相互作用,突出了这种方法的贡献和局限性。在困难和变化的时期,能够测量心理健康领域的深度不确定性稳健性非常重要。在本文中,我们使用新冠疫情爆发作为最近的例子,提供了所建议方法的基本方法学构建块。