Pandey Sriniwas, Cao Yiding, Dong Yingjun, Kim Minjun, MacLaren Neil G, Dionne Shelley D, Yammarino Francis J, Sayama Hiroki
Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA.
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20433. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47823-0.
Studying extreme ideas in routine choices and discussions is of utmost importance to understand the increasing polarization in society. In this study, we focus on understanding the generation and influence of extreme ideas in routine conversations which we label "eccentric" ideas. The eccentricity of any idea is defined as the deviation of that idea from the norm of the social neighborhood. We collected and analyzed data from two sources of different nature: public social media and online experiments in a controlled environment. We compared the popularity of ideas against their eccentricity to understand individuals' fascination towards eccentricity. We found that more eccentric ideas have a higher probability of getting a greater number of "likes". Additionally, we demonstrate that the social neighborhood of an individual conceals eccentricity changes in one's own opinions and facilitates generation of eccentric ideas at a collective level.
在日常选择和讨论中研究极端观点对于理解社会中日益加剧的两极分化至关重要。在本研究中,我们专注于理解日常对话中极端观点(我们称之为“怪异”观点)的产生和影响。任何观点的怪异程度被定义为该观点与社会邻域规范的偏差。我们从两种不同性质的来源收集并分析了数据:公共社交媒体和受控环境下的在线实验。我们将观点的受欢迎程度与它们的怪异程度进行比较,以了解个体对怪异观点的着迷。我们发现,更怪异的观点获得更多“赞”的可能性更高。此外,我们证明个体的社会邻域会掩盖自身观点中怪异程度的变化,并在集体层面促进怪异观点的产生。