• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测在七氟醚麻醉下血管硬度值最小诱发电流下手术切口时的血压变化。

Prediction of blood pressure changes during surgical incision using the minimum evoked current of vascular stiffness value under sevoflurane anesthesia.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.

Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46942-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-46942-y
PMID:37993532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10665398/
Abstract

Necessary and sufficient opioids should be administered for safe and stable anesthesia. However, opioid sensitivity varies among individuals. We previously reported that sympathetic responses to nociceptive stimuli under propofol anesthesia could be predicted by measuring the minimum evoked current of the vascular stiffness value (MEC). However, this result has only been proven under propofol anesthesia. We propose that MEC could be used under anesthesia with a volatile anesthetic. Thirty patients undergoing laparotomy with sevoflurane anesthesia received 0.7 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane and intravenous remifentanil at a constant concentration of 2 ng/mL, followed by tetanic stimulation, to measure MEC. After tetanic stimulation, the same anesthetic conditions were maintained, and the rate of change in systolic blood pressure (ROC) during the skin incision was measured. The correlation coefficient between the MEC and ROC during skin incision under sevoflurane anesthesia was R =  - 0.735 (P < 0.01), similar to that in a previous study with propofol (R =  - 0.723). Thus, a high correlation was observed. The slope of the linear regression equation was - 0.27, similar to that obtained in the study on propofol (- 0.28). These results suggest that, as with propofol anesthesia, MEC can be used as a predictive index for ROC under 0.7 MAC sevoflurane anesthesia.Clinical trial registration: Registry, University hospital Medical Information Network; registration number, UMIN000047425; principal investigator's name, Noboru Saeki; date of registration, April 8, 2022.

摘要

需要给予足够的阿片类药物以确保安全稳定的麻醉。然而,个体对阿片类药物的敏感性存在差异。我们之前报道过,在丙泊酚麻醉下,通过测量血管硬度值的最小诱发电流(MEC)可以预测对伤害性刺激的交感反应。然而,这一结果仅在丙泊酚麻醉下得到证实。我们提出,MEC 可用于挥发性麻醉剂下的麻醉。

30 例接受七氟醚麻醉行剖腹手术的患者,在静脉输注瑞芬太尼(浓度为 2ng/ml)的情况下接受 0.7 最小肺泡浓度(MAC)的七氟醚麻醉,并接受强直刺激,以测量 MEC。强直刺激后,维持相同的麻醉条件,并测量皮肤切开时收缩压的变化率(ROC)。在七氟醚麻醉下皮肤切开时 MEC 与 ROC 之间的相关系数为 R= -0.735(P<0.01),与之前使用丙泊酚的研究相似(R=-0.723)。因此,观察到高度相关。线性回归方程的斜率为-0.27,与丙泊酚研究中获得的斜率相似(-0.28)。这些结果表明,与丙泊酚麻醉一样,MEC 可作为 0.7 MAC 七氟醚麻醉下 ROC 的预测指标。

临床试验注册

日本大学医院医学信息网络;注册号 UMIN000047425;主要研究者姓名 Noboru Saeki;注册日期 2022 年 4 月 8 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/cf23405e066e/41598_2023_46942_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/9330f939a611/41598_2023_46942_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/40e4da211bb6/41598_2023_46942_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/08019df1944a/41598_2023_46942_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/04def079920d/41598_2023_46942_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/cf23405e066e/41598_2023_46942_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/9330f939a611/41598_2023_46942_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/40e4da211bb6/41598_2023_46942_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/08019df1944a/41598_2023_46942_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/04def079920d/41598_2023_46942_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/10665398/cf23405e066e/41598_2023_46942_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of blood pressure changes during surgical incision using the minimum evoked current of vascular stiffness value under sevoflurane anesthesia.预测在七氟醚麻醉下血管硬度值最小诱发电流下手术切口时的血压变化。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46942-y.
2
Prediction of blood pressure change during surgical incision under opioid analgesia using sympathetic response evoking threshold.利用交感反应诱发阈预测在阿片类镇痛药下手术切口中的血压变化。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 5;11(1):9558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87636-7.
3
Effects of anesthetics on nociceptive sensory evoked potentials by intraepidermal noxious electrical stimulation of A-δ fibers.表皮内伤害性电刺激 A-δ 纤维对伤害性感觉诱发电位的麻醉效应。
J Anesth. 2023 Dec;37(6):841-852. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03243-y. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
4
Intraocular pressure more reduced during anesthesia with propofol than with sevoflurane: both combined with remifentanil.与七氟醚相比,丙泊酚麻醉期间眼压降低更明显:两者均联合瑞芬太尼使用。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Jul;46(6):703-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460612.x.
5
Comparison of the Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane Combined With Remifentanil on Transcranial Electric Motor-evoked and Somatosensory-evoked Potential Monitoring During Brainstem Surgery.丙泊酚与七氟醚联合瑞芬太尼对脑干手术中经颅电运动诱发电位和体感诱发电位监测影响的比较
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct;27(4):282-8. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000157.
6
Relationship of bispectral index values, haemodynamic changes and recovery times during sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia in rabbits.七氟醚或丙泊酚麻醉期间家兔的脑电双频指数值、血流动力学变化及恢复时间的关系
Lab Anim. 2006 Jan;40(1):28-42. doi: 10.1258/002367706775404462.
7
Effects of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (S)-ketamine in subanesthetic concentrations on visceral and somatosensory pain-evoked potentials.丙泊酚、七氟醚、瑞芬太尼和(S)-氯胺酮在亚麻醉浓度下对内脏和躯体感觉痛诱发电位的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):308-17. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fb21.
8
Effects of surgical levels of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on cerebral blood flow in healthy subjects studied with positron emission tomography.采用正电子发射断层扫描研究丙泊酚和七氟醚不同麻醉深度对健康受试者脑血流的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2002 Jun;96(6):1358-70. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200206000-00015.
9
The involvement of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels in the different effects of sevoflurane and propofol on glucose metabolism in fed rats.三磷酸腺苷敏感性钾通道在七氟醚和丙泊酚对进食大鼠葡萄糖代谢的不同影响中的作用。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):110-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182373552. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
10
Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia.全麻与椎管内麻醉对男性腰椎手术患者术后转归的影响:一项比较丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉与七氟醚麻醉的随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec 1;21(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Five commercial 'depth of anaesthesia' monitors provide discordant clinical recommendations in response to identical emergence-like EEG signals.五种商业“麻醉深度”监测仪对相同的类似苏醒期的脑电图信号给出了不一致的临床建议。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 May;130(5):536-545. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.026. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review.用于评估手术麻醉患者痛觉的 Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) 和 Nociception Level Index (NOL) 的有效性描述:系统评价。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Jun;36(3):623-635. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00772-3. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
3
[Nociception monitoring : Method for intraoperative opioid control?].[伤害感受监测:术中阿片类药物控制方法?]
Anaesthesist. 2021 Sep;70(9):735-752. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01022-6. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
4
Prediction of blood pressure change during surgical incision under opioid analgesia using sympathetic response evoking threshold.利用交感反应诱发阈预测在阿片类镇痛药下手术切口中的血压变化。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 5;11(1):9558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87636-7.
5
Evaluation of Surgical Pleth Index and Analgesia Nociception Index as surrogate pain measures in conscious postoperative patients: an observational study.评估手术容积指数和镇痛伤害感受指数作为清醒术后患者疼痛替代指标的研究:一项观察性研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Oct;34(5):1087-1093. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00399-5. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
6
Guiding Opioid Administration by 3 Different Analgesia Nociception Monitoring Indices During General Anesthesia Alters Intraoperative Sufentanil Consumption and Stress Hormone Release: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.指导全麻期间通过 3 种不同的镇痛-伤害感受监测指标进行阿片类药物管理可改变术中舒芬太尼的消耗和应激激素的释放:一项随机对照的初步研究。
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1264-1273. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004388.
7
Does nociception monitor-guided anesthesia affect opioid consumption? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.伤害性感受监测引导麻醉是否会影响阿片类药物的使用?一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):629-641. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00362-4. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
8
Perioperative opioid analgesia-when is enough too much? A review of opioid-induced tolerance and hyperalgesia.围手术期阿片类镇痛药——何时多即是少?阿片类药物诱导的耐受和痛觉过敏的综述。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1558-1568. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30430-1.
9
Role of Magnesium Deficiency in Promoting Atherosclerosis, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Arterial Stiffening as Risk Factors for Hypertension.镁缺乏在促进动脉粥样硬化、内皮功能障碍和动脉僵硬度中的作用,这些都是高血压的危险因素。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jun 11;19(6):1724. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061724.
10
Short title: Anaesthetic mechanisms in the CNS Where and how do anaesthetics act? Mec.短标题:中枢神经系统中的麻醉机制 麻醉剂作用于何处以及如何起作用?机制
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(4):288-293. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2017.0046. Epub 2017 Sep 27.