• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较接受奥沙利铂腹腔内压力雾化化疗(PIPAC-OX)与原发性结直肠癌手术治疗的患者报告的腹痛。

Comparing patient reported abdominal pain between patients treated with oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) and primary colorectal cancer surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47510-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-47510-0
PMID:37993560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10665337/
Abstract

Oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) is an emerging palliative treatment for patients with unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases. Previously, our study group reported that patients experienced abdominal pain for several weeks after PIPAC-OX. However, it is unknown how this compares to abdominal pain after regular colorectal cancer surgery. To provide some perspective, this study compared the presence of abdominal pain after PIPAC-OX to the presence of abdominal pain after primary tumor surgery. Patient reported abdominal pain scores (EORTC QLQ-CR-29), from two prospective, Dutch cohorts were used in this study. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, a higher score represents more abdominal pain. Abdominal pain at baseline and at four weeks after treatment were compared between the two groups. Twenty patients who underwent PIPAC-OX and 322 patients who underwent primary tumor surgery were included in the analysis. At baseline, there were no differences in abdominal pain between both groups (mean 20 vs. 18, respectively; p = 0.688). Four weeks after treatment, abdominal pain was significantly worse in the PIPAC group (39 vs 15, respectively; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.99). The differential effect over time for abdominal pain differed significantly between both groups (mean difference: 19 vs - 3, respectively; p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.88). PIPAC-OX resulted in significantly worse postoperative abdominal pain than primary tumor surgery. These results can be used for patient counseling and stress the need for adequate analgesia during and after PIPAC-OX. Further research is required to prevent or reduce abdominal pain after PIPAC-OX.Trial registration CRC-PIPAC: Clinicaltrails.gov NCT03246321 (01-10-2017).

摘要

奥沙利铂腹腔内压力喷雾化疗(PIPAC-OX)是一种治疗无法切除的结直肠腹膜转移的新兴姑息治疗方法。此前,我们的研究小组报告称,患者在接受 PIPAC-OX 后会经历数周的腹痛。然而,目前尚不清楚这种情况与常规结直肠癌手术后的腹痛相比如何。为了提供一些参考,本研究比较了 PIPAC-OX 后和原发肿瘤手术后的腹痛情况。本研究使用了两个前瞻性荷兰队列的患者报告的腹痛评分(EORTC QLQ-CR-29)。评分范围从 0 到 100,评分越高表示腹痛越严重。比较了两组患者在基线和治疗后 4 周的腹痛评分。共纳入 20 例接受 PIPAC-OX 治疗的患者和 322 例接受原发肿瘤手术的患者。在基线时,两组患者的腹痛无差异(平均分别为 20 分和 18 分;p=0.688)。治疗后 4 周,PIPAC 组的腹痛明显更严重(分别为 39 分和 15 分;p<0.001;Cohen's d=0.99)。两组患者的腹痛随时间的差异有统计学意义(平均差值:19 分与-3 分;p=0.004;Cohen's d=0.88)。PIPAC-OX 术后腹痛明显比原发肿瘤手术更严重。这些结果可用于患者咨询,并强调在 PIPAC-OX 期间和之后需要充分的镇痛。需要进一步研究以预防或减轻 PIPAC-OX 后的腹痛。

试验注册

CRC-PIPAC:Clinicaltrails.gov NCT03246321(2017 年 10 月 1 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdc5/10665337/cd96ed8d5a0d/41598_2023_47510_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdc5/10665337/cd96ed8d5a0d/41598_2023_47510_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdc5/10665337/cd96ed8d5a0d/41598_2023_47510_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing patient reported abdominal pain between patients treated with oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) and primary colorectal cancer surgery.比较接受奥沙利铂腹腔内压力雾化化疗(PIPAC-OX)与原发性结直肠癌手术治疗的患者报告的腹痛。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47510-0.
2
Patient-reported outcomes during repetitive oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases in a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (CRC-PIPAC).多中心、单臂、2 期临床试验(CRC-PIPAC)中,采用重复奥沙利铂腹腔内高压气溶胶化疗治疗孤立性不可切除结直肠腹膜转移患者的报告结局。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4486-4498. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08802-6. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (Oxaliplatin) for Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial (CRC-PIPAC).腹腔内高压气溶胶化疗(奥沙利铂)治疗不可切除的结直肠腹膜转移:多中心、单臂、二期试验(CRC-PIPAC)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):5311-5326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09558-4. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
4
Repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC) with oxaliplatin as a palliative monotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a Dutch, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study (CRC-PIPAC).重复静电加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(ePIPAC)联合奥沙利铂作为不可切除结直肠腹膜转移孤立灶的姑息性单药治疗:一项荷兰多中心、开放标签、单臂、Ⅱ期研究(CRC-PIPAC)的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e030408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030408.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Oxaliplatin-Based Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy With or Without Intraoperative Intravenous 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study.奥沙利铂腹腔内高压雾化化疗联合或不联合术中静脉氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙治疗结直肠腹膜转移的可行性和安全性:一项多中心对比队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug;29(8):5243-5251. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11577-2. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Oxaliplatin use in pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is safe and effective: A multicenter study.奥沙利铂在腹腔内压力气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)中的应用是安全有效的:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;45(12):2386-2391. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases.腹腔内热灌注化疗治疗结直肠腹膜转移。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):5275-5286. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09508-0. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis.奥沙利铂腹腔内加压雾化化疗用于结直肠癌腹膜转移
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Apr;18(4):364-71. doi: 10.1111/codi.13130.
9
Assessment of postoperative pain after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis.评估腹腔内压力化疗(PIPAC)治疗腹膜转移术后疼痛。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;37(7):1709-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04182-y. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
Severe peritoneal sclerosis after repeated pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC OX): report of two cases and literature survey.重复奥沙利铂腹腔内加压气溶胶化疗(PIPAC OX)后发生严重腹腔硬化症:两例报告及文献复习。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018 Mar;35(3):103-108. doi: 10.1007/s10585-018-9895-9. Epub 2018 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗用于结直肠癌患者腹膜癌病:证据的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;16(21):3661. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213661.
2
Patient-reported outcomes during first-line palliative systemic therapy alternated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: a single-arm phase II trial (CRC-PIPAC-II).一线姑息性系统治疗联合腹腔内高压气溶胶化疗治疗不可切除结直肠腹膜转移患者的报告结果:一项单臂 II 期试验(CRC-PIPAC-II)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6566-6576. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11185-z. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Peritoneal Metastasis with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy: Results from the Prospective PIPAC-OPC2 Study.加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗治疗腹膜转移:前瞻性PIPAC-OPC2研究结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):2634-2644. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13010-0. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
2
Patient-reported outcomes during repetitive oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases in a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (CRC-PIPAC).多中心、单臂、2 期临床试验(CRC-PIPAC)中,采用重复奥沙利铂腹腔内高压气溶胶化疗治疗孤立性不可切除结直肠腹膜转移患者的报告结局。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4486-4498. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08802-6. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC-OX) in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases-a systematic review.奥沙利铂腹腔内加压雾化化疗(PIPAC - OX)用于结直肠癌腹膜转移患者的系统评价
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):S242-S258. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-257.
4
Local peritoneal toxicity from adjuvant pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in high-risk patients with colonic cancer.奥沙利铂辅助加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗对高危结肠癌患者的局部腹膜毒性。
Br J Surg. 2021 May 27;108(5):e187-e188. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab043.
5
Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (Oxaliplatin) for Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial (CRC-PIPAC).腹腔内高压气溶胶化疗(奥沙利铂)治疗不可切除的结直肠腹膜转移:多中心、单臂、二期试验(CRC-PIPAC)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):5311-5326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09558-4. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases.腹腔内热灌注化疗治疗结直肠腹膜转移。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):5275-5286. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09508-0. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
7
Increase in the incidence of synchronous and metachronous peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: A nationwide study.结直肠癌患者同时性和异时性腹膜转移发生率的增加:一项全国性研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;47(5):1026-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.135. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
8
Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy Enhanced by Electrostatic Precipitation (ePIPAC) for Patients with Peritoneal Metastases.经静电沉淀增强的腹腔内加压气溶胶化疗(ePIPAC)治疗腹膜转移患者。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3852-3860. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09332-6. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
9
The course of peripheral neuropathy and its association with health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer patients.结直肠癌患者周围神经病变的病程及其与健康相关生活质量的关系。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Apr;15(2):190-200. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00923-6. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
10
PIPAC-OX: A Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin-Based Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases.PIPAC-OX:一项奥沙利铂为基础的腹腔内加压雾化化疗治疗腹膜转移患者的 I 期研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Apr 1;27(7):1875-1881. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2152. Epub 2020 Nov 4.