Lurvink Robin J, Rovers Koen P, Nienhuijs Simon W, Creemers Geert-Jan, Burger Jacobus W A, de Hingh Ignace H J
Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):S242-S258. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-257.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC-OX) is increasingly used as a palliative treatment option for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The present study aimed to systematically review all clinical studies reporting safety and efficacy outcomes of PIPAC-OX in patients with CPM. PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were systematically searched to identify all clinical studies that included at least one patient with CPM treated with PIPAC-OX and reported one of the following outcomes: adverse events, tumor response, quality of life, secondary cytoreductive surgery, progression-free survival, overall survival, and environmental safety of PIPAC-OX. Results were narratively described. Of 28 included studies, only 14 non-comparative studies separately reported at least one outcome of PIPAC-OX for CPM, of which only two studies specifically focused on this group. These 14 studies reported adverse events (5 studies), tumor response (5 studies), secondary cytoreductive surgery (4 studies), progression-free survival (1 study), overall survival (5 studies), and environmental safety (2 studies). Except for 5 studies (describing 26 patients), none of the included studies stratified their results for PIPAC-OX monotherapy and PIPAC-OX with concomitant systemic therapy, and none of the studies reporting survival outcomes stratified results for line of palliative treatment, complicating interpretation. No PIPAC-OX related deaths were reported. No occupational platinum was detected during PIPAC-OX. The available evidence regarding PIPAC-OX for CPM is limited and difficult to interpret. Despite these limitations, PIPAC-OX appears safe in patients with CPM and safe for operating personnel. To increase insight in the role of PIPAC-OX in this setting, investigators of ongoing and future studies are encouraged to report separate outcomes of PIPAC-OX for CPM, to stratify their results for PIPAC-OX monotherapy and PIPAC-OX with concomitant systemic therapy, and to stratify survival results for line of palliative treatment.
奥沙利铂腹腔内加压气雾化疗(PIPAC-OX)越来越多地被用作结直肠癌腹膜转移(CPM)患者的姑息治疗选择。本研究旨在系统回顾所有报告PIPAC-OX治疗CPM患者安全性和疗效结果的临床研究。系统检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和CINAHL,以识别所有临床研究,这些研究纳入了至少1例接受PIPAC-OX治疗的CPM患者,并报告了以下结果之一:不良事件、肿瘤反应、生活质量、二次减瘤手术、无进展生存期、总生存期以及PIPAC-OX的环境安全性。对结果进行了叙述性描述。在纳入的28项研究中,只有14项非对照研究分别报告了PIPAC-OX治疗CPM的至少一项结果,其中只有两项研究专门针对该组。这14项研究报告了不良事件(5项研究)、肿瘤反应(5项研究)、二次减瘤手术(4项研究)、无进展生存期(1项研究)、总生存期(5项研究)和环境安全性(2项研究)。除了5项研究(描述了26例患者)外,纳入的研究均未对PIPAC-OX单药治疗和PIPAC-OX联合全身治疗的结果进行分层,且报告生存结果的研究均未对姑息治疗线的结果进行分层,这使得解读变得复杂。未报告与PIPAC-OX相关的死亡。在PIPAC-OX期间未检测到职业性铂。关于PIPAC-OX治疗CPM的现有证据有限且难以解读。尽管存在这些局限性,但PIPAC-OX在CPM患者中似乎是安全的,对操作人员也是安全的。为了更深入了解PIPAC-OX在这种情况下的作用,鼓励正在进行和未来研究的研究者报告PIPAC-OX治疗CPM的单独结果,对PIPAC-OX单药治疗和PIPAC-OX联合全身治疗的结果进行分层,并对姑息治疗线的生存结果进行分层。