• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析 48 种乌头属植物的密码子使用模式。

Analysis of codon usage patterns in 48 Aconitum species.

机构信息

College of Pharmaceutical Science, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, 671000, China.

Key Laboratory of Yunnan Provincial Higher Education Institutions for Development of Yunnan Daodi Medicinal Materials Resources, Dali, Yunnan, 671000, China.

出版信息

BMC Genomics. 2023 Nov 22;24(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09650-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12864-023-09650-5
PMID:37993787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10664653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Aconitum genus is a crucial member of the Ranunculaceae family. There are 350 Aconitum species worldwide, with about 170 species found in China. These species are known for their various pharmacological effects and are commonly used to treat joint pain, cold abdominal pain, and other ailments. Codon usage bias (CUB) analysis contributes to evolutionary relationships and phylogeny. Based on protein-coding sequences (PCGs), we selected 48 species of Aconitum for CUB analysis.

RESULTS

The results revealed that Aconitum species had less than 50% GC content. Furthermore, the distribution of GC content was irregular and followed a trend of GC > GC > GC, indicating a bias towards A/T bases. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) heat map revealed the presence of conservative codons with slight variations within the genus. The effective number of codons (ENC)-Plot and the parity rule 2 (PR2)-bias plot analysis indicate that natural selection is the primary factor influencing the variation in codon usage. As a result, we screened various optimal codons and found that A/T bases were preferred as the last codon. Furthermore, our Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis based on PCGs among 48 Aconitum species yielded results consistent with those obtained from complete chloroplast (cp.) genome data. This suggests that analyzing mutation in PCGs is an efficient method for demonstrating the phylogeny of species at the genus level.

CONCLUSIONS

The CUB analysis of 48 species of Aconitum was mainly influenced by natural selection. This study reveals the CUB pattern of Aconitum and lays the foundation for future genetic modification and phylogenetic analyses.

摘要

背景

乌头属是毛茛科的重要成员。全世界有 350 种乌头,其中约 170 种在中国。这些物种以其各种药理作用而闻名,常用于治疗关节痛、寒腹痛等疾病。密码子使用偏性(CUB)分析有助于研究进化关系和系统发育。基于蛋白质编码序列(PCGs),我们选择了 48 种乌头进行 CUB 分析。

结果

结果表明,乌头属物种的 GC 含量低于 50%。此外,GC 含量的分布不规则,遵循 GC>GC>GC 的趋势,表明偏向于 A/T 碱基。相对同义密码子使用(RSCU)热图显示,在属内存在保守密码子,略有变化。有效密码子数(ENC)-图和奇偶规则 2(PR2)-偏性图分析表明,自然选择是影响密码子使用变异的主要因素。因此,我们筛选了各种最优密码子,发现 A/T 碱基是最后一个密码子的首选。此外,我们基于 48 种乌头属物种的 PCGs 进行最大似然(ML)分析,结果与基于完整叶绿体(cp.)基因组数据的结果一致。这表明,分析 PCGs 中的突变是证明种间系统发育的有效方法。

结论

对 48 种乌头属的 CUB 分析主要受自然选择的影响。本研究揭示了乌头属的 CUB 模式,为未来的遗传修饰和系统发育分析奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/af2406024fbd/12864_2023_9650_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/449ad5ff93b0/12864_2023_9650_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/00d6c0d1953c/12864_2023_9650_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/92f7de6db573/12864_2023_9650_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/0da01f256637/12864_2023_9650_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/e1579a0f3a74/12864_2023_9650_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/cfea20de7f3c/12864_2023_9650_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/bb1408ebd813/12864_2023_9650_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/45ab8e1f3f25/12864_2023_9650_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/af2406024fbd/12864_2023_9650_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/449ad5ff93b0/12864_2023_9650_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/00d6c0d1953c/12864_2023_9650_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/92f7de6db573/12864_2023_9650_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/0da01f256637/12864_2023_9650_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/e1579a0f3a74/12864_2023_9650_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/cfea20de7f3c/12864_2023_9650_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/bb1408ebd813/12864_2023_9650_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/45ab8e1f3f25/12864_2023_9650_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97c/10664653/af2406024fbd/12864_2023_9650_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of codon usage patterns in 48 Aconitum species.分析 48 种乌头属植物的密码子使用模式。
BMC Genomics. 2023 Nov 22;24(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09650-5.
2
Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in 16 chloroplast genomes of suborder Halimedineae.16 种滨藜亚科叶绿体基因组密码子使用模式的比较分析。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Oct 8;25(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10825-x.
3
Codon usage characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial genome in Hemerocallis citrina.萱草线粒体基因组密码子使用特征及系统发育分析。
BMC Genom Data. 2024 Jan 13;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12863-024-01191-4.
4
Analysis of codon usage bias and evolution in the chloroplast genome of Mesona chinensis Benth.凉粉草叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏好性及进化分析
Dev Genes Evol. 2021 Mar;231(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00427-020-00670-9. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
5
Comparative Analysis of the Codon Usage Pattern in the Chloroplast Genomes of Gnetales Species.比较分析买麻藤目植物叶绿体基因组的密码子使用模式。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 2;25(19):10622. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910622.
6
Evolution of Codon Usage Bias in Diatoms.硅藻密码子使用偏好的进化。
Genes (Basel). 2019 Nov 6;10(11):894. doi: 10.3390/genes10110894.
7
Analysis of codon usage bias of thioredoxin in apicomplexan protozoa.分析顶复门原生动物硫氧还蛋白的密码子使用偏性。
Parasit Vectors. 2023 Nov 21;16(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-06002-w.
8
Analysis of Codon Usage Bias in Chloroplast Genomes of var. (Rosaceae).分析蔷薇科(Rosaceae) 变种叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏性。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;15(7):899. doi: 10.3390/genes15070899.
9
Comparative Analysis of Codon Usage Bias in Six Genomes.六个基因组密码子使用偏性的比较分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 1;25(15):8398. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158398.
10
Analysis of codon usage bias of chloroplast genes in Oryza species : Codon usage of chloroplast genes in Oryza species.对水稻属叶绿体基因密码子使用偏性的分析:水稻属叶绿体基因的密码子使用情况。
Planta. 2020 Sep 28;252(4):67. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03470-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive analysis of the codon usage patterns in the polyprotein coding sequences of the honeybee viruses.蜜蜂病毒多蛋白编码序列中密码子使用模式的综合分析。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 4;12:1567209. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1567209. eCollection 2025.
2
In Silico Genomic Analysis of Chloroplast DNA in Vitis L.: Identification of Key Regions for DNA Coding.葡萄叶绿体DNA的计算机基因组分析:DNA编码关键区域的鉴定
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 31;16(6):686. doi: 10.3390/genes16060686.
3
Natural Selection as the Primary Driver of Codon Usage Bias in the Mitochondrial Genomes of Three Species.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of the Chloroplast Genome for Species: Genome Structure and Phylogenetic Relationships.物种叶绿体基因组的比较分析:基因组结构与系统发育关系
Front Genet. 2022 May 31;13:878182. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.878182. eCollection 2022.
2
Analysis of codon usage bias of chloroplast genomes in species.物种叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏好性分析
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2021 Dec;27(12):2727-2737. doi: 10.1007/s12298-021-01105-z. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of (Ranunculaceae).
自然选择作为三种物种线粒体基因组密码子使用偏好的主要驱动因素
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 30;16(6):673. doi: 10.3390/genes16060673.
4
Analysis of Codon Usage Bias of 30 Chloroplast Genomes in (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta).绿藻门石莼纲30个叶绿体基因组的密码子使用偏好性分析
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 21;16(5):608. doi: 10.3390/genes16050608.
5
Deciphering the complex organelle genomes of two Rhododendron species and insights into adaptive evolution patterns in high-altitude.解析两种高山杜鹃属植物的复杂细胞器基因组,揭示适应进化模式。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Nov 8;24(1):1054. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05761-7.
6
Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of the chloroplast genomes of four commonly used medicinal cultivars of Chrysanthemums morifolium.四种常用药用菊花品种叶绿体基因组的比较和系统发育分析。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05679-0.
7
Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in 16 chloroplast genomes of suborder Halimedineae.16 种滨藜亚科叶绿体基因组密码子使用模式的比较分析。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Oct 8;25(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10825-x.
8
Analysis of codon usage patterns in complete plastomes of four medicinal species (Asparagaceae).四种药用植物(天门冬科)完整质体基因组的密码子使用模式分析。
Front Genet. 2024 Sep 19;15:1401013. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1401013. eCollection 2024.
9
Comparative analysis of codon usage bias in the chloroplast genomes of eighteen Ampelopsideae species (Vitaceae).十八种葡萄科崖爬藤属叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏性的比较分析。
BMC Genom Data. 2024 Sep 2;25(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12863-024-01260-8.
10
Patterns in Genome-Wide Codon Usage Bias in Representative Species of Lycophytes and Ferns.维管植物石松目和木贼目代表物种基因组密码子使用偏性的模式。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jul 5;15(7):887. doi: 10.3390/genes15070887.
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2020 Jul 25;5(3):2982-2983. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1787894.
4
Analysis of codon usage patterns in citrus based on coding sequence data.基于编码序列数据的柑橘密码子使用模式分析。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Dec 16;21(Suppl 5):234. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6641-x.
5
Analysis of codon usage bias and evolution in the chloroplast genome of Mesona chinensis Benth.凉粉草叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏好性及进化分析
Dev Genes Evol. 2021 Mar;231(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00427-020-00670-9. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
Natural Selection Shapes Codon Usage in the Human Genome.自然选择塑造人类基因组中的密码子使用。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Jul 2;107(1):83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
Codon usage by chloroplast gene is bias in .叶绿体基因的密码子使用存在偏向性。 (你提供的原文似乎不太完整,推测完整句子可能是这样,具体可根据实际情况调整)
J Genet. 2020;99.
8
Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in chloroplast genomes of six species.六种植物叶绿体基因组密码子使用模式的比较分析。
PeerJ. 2020 Jan 6;8:e8251. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8251. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Four Medicinal Species.四种药用植物叶绿体基因组的比较分析。
Molecules. 2018 Apr 26;23(5):1015. doi: 10.3390/molecules23051015.
10
DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets.DnaSP 6:大型数据集的 DNA 序列多态性分析。
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3299-3302. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx248.