Suppr超能文献

对静态、动态及综合工作的生理反应。

Physiologic responses to static, dynamic and combined work.

作者信息

Asfour S S, Genaidy A M, Khalil T M, Muthuswamy S

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Dec;47(12):798-802. doi: 10.1080/15298668691390683.

Abstract

The main objective of the present study was to determine the effects on cardiovascular stress of tasks that have varying degrees of static and dynamic components (weight holding, manual lifting and stepping). Heart rate, oxygen consumption and blood pressure were used as indices of cardiovascular stress. The results showed that oxygen consumption and heart rate responses to manual lifting are significantly lower than those of stepping and higher than those of weight holding. A low frequency lifting task evoked significantly lower systolic blood pressure than a high frequency lifting task. This study supported the idea that a physiologic fatigue criterion (PFC) based on stepping should not be applied directly to tasks such as manual lifting. In addition, a PFC for manual lifting should not be based only on oxygen consumption or heart rate; it also should incorporate systolic blood pressure as one of the monitored stress factors in setting lifting standards.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是确定具有不同程度静态和动态成分(握持重物、手动提举和踏步)的任务对心血管应激的影响。心率、耗氧量和血压被用作心血管应激的指标。结果表明,手动提举时的耗氧量和心率反应显著低于踏步,高于握持重物。低频提举任务引起的收缩压显著低于高频提举任务。本研究支持这样一种观点,即基于踏步的生理疲劳标准(PFC)不应直接应用于手动提举等任务。此外,手动提举的PFC不应仅基于耗氧量或心率;在设定提举标准时,还应将收缩压作为监测的应激因素之一纳入其中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验