Garg A, Saxena U
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1979 Oct;40(10):894-503. doi: 10.1080/15298667991430460.
A laboratory study was conducted (1) to evaluate the effects of lifting frequency and technique on maximum acceptable work loads using psychophysical measurement technique, and (2) to compare the physiological fatigue criteria of 5 Kcal/min with the psychophysical fatigue criteria by measuring the metabolic rates at maximum acceptable work loads determined by subjective estimates of physical fatigue. Six male college students were required to lift from the floor to a 0.5 m height for 40 minutes. Four levels of lifting frequency (3, 6, 9 and 12 lifts/min) and three different lifting techniques (free sytle, stooped back and straight-back, bent-knee) were employed. Oxygen consumption rates were measured at maximum acceptable work loads (and were reduced to STPD). Statistical analysis showed that the maximum work loads acceptable to the workers were significantly affected by both lifting frequency and technique. Maximum acceptable work loads increased with an increase in lifting frequency. Both the subjective estimates of physical fatigue and the metabolic energy expenditure rate favored the free style lifting technique. The measured metabolic rates were in agreement with the physiological fatigue criteria of 5 Kcal/min only for six of the twelve combinations of lifting frequency and technique. Use of the physiological fatigue criteria will result in more liberal standards of work load at low work paces, especially for the stooped back and the free style lifting techniques.
(1)使用心理物理学测量技术评估提升频率和技术对最大可接受工作负荷的影响;(2)通过测量在由身体疲劳主观估计确定的最大可接受工作负荷下的代谢率,将5千卡/分钟的生理疲劳标准与心理物理学疲劳标准进行比较。六名男大学生被要求从地面将重物提升至0.5米高度,持续40分钟。采用了四个提升频率水平(3、6、9和12次/分钟)和三种不同的提升技术(自由式、弯腰和直背屈膝式)。在最大可接受工作负荷下测量耗氧率(并换算至标准温度、压力和干燥条件)。统计分析表明,工人的最大可接受工作负荷受到提升频率和技术的显著影响。最大可接受工作负荷随提升频率的增加而增加。身体疲劳的主观估计和代谢能量消耗率都有利于自由式提升技术。在提升频率和技术的十二种组合中,只有六种组合下测得的代谢率与5千卡/分钟的生理疲劳标准相符。使用生理疲劳标准将导致在低工作节奏下工作负荷标准更为宽松,尤其是对于弯腰和自由式提升技术而言。