• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[健康福祉研究所初级卫生保健课程满意度调查的综合分析]

[Mixed analysis of the satisfaction survey of the Primary Health Care course of the Institute of Health for Well-being].

作者信息

Juárez-Medel Carlos Alberto, Toledo-Ortiz Rosbel, González-Rojas Jessica Margarita, Romero-Casillas Yesenia, Reyna-Álvarez Malú Aidee, de la Rosa-Cruz Sergio Aarón, Cano-Collado Luz Alejandra, González-Bonilla César Raúl

机构信息

Instituto de Salud para el Bienestar, Unidad de Coordinación Nacional Médica, Coordinación de Formación y Capacitación del Personal de Salud, Dirección de Investigación Educativa. Acapulco, Guerrero, México.

Instituto de Salud para el Bienestar, Unidad de Coordinación Nacional Médica, Coordinación de Formación y Capacitación del Personal de Salud. Acapulco, Guerrero, México.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Nov 6;61(6):747-758. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10064301.

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10064301
PMID:37995301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10712933/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Describing the perception towards the online course on Primary Health Care (PHC) of the Institute of Health for Well-being (INSABI) will allow to establish improvement actions.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the factors that contribute to satisfaction with the PHC course offered online by INSABI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

620 records of the Health Education System for Well-being were studied. Satisfaction was determined using a Likert-type questionnaire with three dimensions: virtual environment, cognitive area, and measurement of learning. A deductive analysis of the open opinions was carried out.

RESULTS

70% of the health personnel approved the course in less than a week, with an initial score of 5.41 ±1.9 points and final score of 7.8 ± 1.2. More than 65% had scores above the average in the three dimensions. Satisfaction with the virtual environment was 15.57 ± 3.4 points, and 15.73 ± 3.3 with the cognitive dimension. Age and gender were associated with dissatisfaction with the virtual environment and in the cognitive dimension, age was associated with dissatisfaction; 27.7% expressed negative comments, 28.5% related to course extension; 15.5% about the didactic techniques, 10.9% about the speakers and 10.4% about the final exam.

CONCLUSIONS

The course generates significant learning, 62.4% of the students have a positive or neutral opinion. However, 27.8% expressed dissatisfaction, the majority related to the extension of the course.

摘要

背景

描述对健康与幸福研究所(INSABI)初级卫生保健在线课程的看法,将有助于确定改进措施。

目的

描述有助于对INSABI提供的初级卫生保健在线课程感到满意的因素。

材料与方法

研究了620份健康与幸福教育系统记录。使用具有三个维度的李克特式问卷确定满意度:虚拟环境、认知领域和学习测评。对开放性意见进行了演绎分析。

结果

70%的卫生人员在不到一周的时间内认可了该课程,初始分数为5.41±1.9分,最终分数为7.8±1.2分。超过65%的人在三个维度上的得分高于平均分。对虚拟环境的满意度为15.57±3.4分,对认知维度的满意度为15.73±3.3分。年龄和性别与对虚拟环境的不满有关,在认知维度上,年龄与不满有关;27.7%的人表达了负面意见,28.5%与课程时长有关;15.5%与教学技巧有关,10.9%与授课者有关,10.4%与期末考试有关。

结论

该课程产生了显著的学习效果,62.4%的学生持积极或中立态度。然而,27.8%的人表示不满,大多数与课程时长有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b9/10712933/2f7c750db4d5/04435117-61-6-747-c004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b9/10712933/6a01aea563f2/04435117-61-6-747-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b9/10712933/1f8a10ee75b8/04435117-61-6-747-c003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b9/10712933/2f7c750db4d5/04435117-61-6-747-c004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b9/10712933/6a01aea563f2/04435117-61-6-747-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b9/10712933/1f8a10ee75b8/04435117-61-6-747-c003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b9/10712933/2f7c750db4d5/04435117-61-6-747-c004.jpg

相似文献

1
[Mixed analysis of the satisfaction survey of the Primary Health Care course of the Institute of Health for Well-being].[健康福祉研究所初级卫生保健课程满意度调查的综合分析]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Nov 6;61(6):747-758. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10064301.
2
Experiences of a student-run clinic in primary care: a mixed-method study with students, patients and supervisors.学生运营的基层医疗诊所的经验:一项针对学生、患者和督导员的混合方法研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Mar;36(1):36-46. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1426143. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
3
Advanced practice nursing in Latin America and the Caribbean: regulation, education and practice.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的高级实践护理:监管、教育与实践
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Aug 8;24:e2807. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1615.2807.
4
Online Learning in the Face of COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessment of Students' Satisfaction at Chitwan Medical College of Nepal.面对新冠疫情的在线学习:尼泊尔奇特旺医学院学生满意度评估
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2020;18(70):40-47.
5
A mixed method analysis of student satisfaction with active learning techniques in an online graduate anatomy course: Consideration of demographics and previous course enrollment.对在线研究生解剖学课程中学生对主动学习技术满意度的混合方法分析:对人口统计学和先前课程注册情况的考量
Anat Sci Educ. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):907-925. doi: 10.1002/ase.2276. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
6
Unravelling the complexities of nursing students' feedback on the clinical learning environment: a mixed methods approach.剖析护理专业学生对临床学习环境反馈的复杂性:一种混合方法研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
7
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
A Web-based distance education course in nutrition in public health: case study.基于网络的公共卫生营养远程教育课程:案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2001 Apr-Jun;3(2):E16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e16.
9
Impact of Virtual Learning Environment on Students' Satisfaction, Engagement, Recall, and Retention.虚拟学习环境对学生满意度、参与度、记忆力和知识保持率的影响。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019 Sep;50(3):408-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Factors associated to clinical learning in nursing students in primary health care: an analytical cross-sectional study.与初级卫生保健中护理专业学生临床学习相关的因素:一项分析性横断面研究。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Sep 9;24(0):e2803. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0327.2803.

本文引用的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Salud Publica Mex. 2023 Apr 21;65(3):306-307. doi: 10.21149/14490.
2
[Development of the INSABI educational strategy: a lesson learned from the COVID-19 epidemic].[国家卫生与福利研究所教育战略的制定:从新冠疫情中汲取的教训]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 May 2;61(3):386-398.
3
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice regarding Narrative Medicine among Chinese Medical Personnel: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey.中文医务人员叙事医学知识、态度和实践的在线横断面调查。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Oct 12;2022:3329360. doi: 10.1155/2022/3329360. eCollection 2022.
4
Challenges and barriers to e-learning experienced by trainers and training coordinators in the Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 crisis.沙特阿拉伯卫生部培训师和培训协调员在 COVID-19 危机期间在线学习所面临的挑战和障碍。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0274816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274816. eCollection 2022.
5
Blended Learning in Health Care Education: An Overview and Overarching Meta-analysis of Systematic Reviews.混合式学习在医疗保健教育中的应用:系统评价的概述和综合分析。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022 Oct 1;42(4):256-264. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000455. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Attitude, knowledge, and barriers towards research analysis and writing in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯对研究分析与写作的态度、知识及障碍
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 May;11(5):2123-2128. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1991_21. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Optimizing the integration of family caregivers in the delivery of person-centered care: evaluation of an educational program for the healthcare workforce.优化家庭护理员在提供以患者为中心的护理方面的整合:医疗保健人员教育计划的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07689-w.
8
Interprofessional Education: Reaching Health Professionals With an Interactive Professional Virtual/Online Event on Advocacy and Policy.跨专业教育:通过互动式专业虚拟/在线活动促进健康专业人员参与倡导和政策。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;8:606394. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.606394. eCollection 2020.
9
Health system strengthening through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis from the available evidence.在新冠疫情期间通过大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)加强卫生系统:基于现有证据的分析
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Aug 31;9:195. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_377_20. eCollection 2020.
10
Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.混合式学习与医学教育中的传统学习比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 10;22(8):e16504. doi: 10.2196/16504.