Webster Emily, Palanco Lopez Paula, Kirchhelle Claas
Department of Philosophy, Durham University, Durham, UK; Department of Philosophy, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 Apr;24(4):e232-e244. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00500-5. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
160 years after the discovery of its waterborne transmission and 120 years after the development of the first-generation of vaccines, typhoid fever remains a major health threat globally. In this Historical Review, we use WHO's Institutional Repository for Information Sharing to examine changes in typhoid control policy from January, 1940, to December, 2019. We used a mixed-methods approach in the analysis of infection control priorities, combining semi-inductive thematic coding with historical analysis to show major thematic shifts in typhoid control policy, away from water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)-based control towards vaccine-based interventions concurrent with declining attention to the disease. Documentary analysis shows that, although international planners never officially disavowed WASH and low-income countries persistently lobbied for WASH, vaccines emerged as a permanent stopgap while meaningful support of sustained WASH strengthening lost momentum-with serious, long-term ramifications for typhoid control.
在发现伤寒通过水传播160年后,以及第一代疫苗研发120年后,伤寒热仍然是全球主要的健康威胁。在这篇历史回顾中,我们利用世界卫生组织的信息共享机构知识库,研究1940年1月至2019年12月期间伤寒控制政策的变化。我们采用混合方法分析感染控制重点,将半归纳主题编码与历史分析相结合,以展示伤寒控制政策的主要主题转变,从基于水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)的控制转向基于疫苗的干预措施,同时对该疾病的关注减少。文献分析表明,尽管国际规划者从未正式放弃WASH,低收入国家也一直在游说支持WASH,但疫苗成为了一种永久性的权宜之计,而对持续加强WASH的有意义支持却失去了动力——这对伤寒控制产生了严重的长期影响。