Department of vascular surgery, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland; Department of vascular surgery, University of Turku, Finland.
Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 May;67(5):718-725. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.018. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
Current guidelines recommend diameter monitoring of small and asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) due to the low risk of rupture. Elective AAA repair is recommended for diameters ≥ 5.5 cm in men and ≥ 5.0 cm in women. However, data supporting the efficacy of elective treatment for all patients above these thresholds are diverging. For a subgroup of patients, life expectancy might be very short, and elective AAA repair at the current threshold may not be justified. This study aimed to externally validate a predictive model for survival of patients with an asymptomatic AAA treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
This was a multicentre international retrospective observational cohort study. Data were collected from four European aortic centres treating patients between 2001 and 2021. The initial model included age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as independent predictors for survival. Model performance was measured by discrimination and calibration.
The validation cohort included 1 500 patients with a median follow up of 65 months, during which 54.6% of the patients died. The external validation showed slightly decreased discrimination ability and signs of overfitting in model calibration. However, a high risk subgroup of patients with impaired survival rates was identified: octogenarians with eGFR < 60 OR COPD, septuagenarians with eGFR < 30, and septuagenarians with eGFR < 60 and COPD having survival rates of only 55.2% and 15.5% at five and 10 years, respectively.
EVAR is a valuable treatment option for AAA, especially for patients unsuitable for open repair. Nonetheless, not all these patients will benefit from EVAR, and an individualised treatment recommendation should include considerations on life expectancy. This study provides a risk stratification to identify patients who may not benefit from EVAR using the present diameter thresholds.
由于破裂风险较低,目前指南建议对小且无症状的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)进行直径监测。建议对男性直径≥5.5cm 和女性直径≥5.0cm 的 AAA 进行择期修复。然而,支持所有大于这些阈值的患者进行择期治疗的疗效的数据存在差异。对于一部分患者,预期寿命可能非常短,目前按阈值进行择期 AAA 修复可能是不合理的。本研究旨在对外科治疗的无症状 AAA 患者的生存预测模型进行验证。
这是一项多中心国际回顾性观察队列研究。数据来自于 2001 年至 2021 年期间治疗患者的四个欧洲主动脉中心。初始模型包括年龄、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)作为生存的独立预测因素。通过区分度和校准来衡量模型性能。
验证队列包括 1500 名患者,中位随访时间为 65 个月,期间 54.6%的患者死亡。外部验证显示,模型区分能力略有下降,校准存在过度拟合的迹象。然而,确定了一个生存率受损的高危患者亚组:年龄在 80 岁以上且 eGFR<60 或 COPD、70 岁以上且 eGFR<30 以及 70 岁以上且 eGFR<60 且 COPD 的患者,其五年和十年的生存率分别仅为 55.2%和 15.5%。
EVAR 是 AAA 的一种有价值的治疗选择,尤其是对于不适合开放修复的患者。尽管如此,并非所有这些患者都将从 EVAR 中受益,个性化的治疗建议应考虑预期寿命。本研究提供了一种风险分层,以识别使用当前直径阈值可能不会从 EVAR 中受益的患者。