照顾高需求患者。
Caring for high-need patients.
机构信息
Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
出版信息
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):1289. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10236-w.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to explore the construct of "high need" and identify common need domains among high-need patients, their care professionals, and healthcare organizations; and to describe the interventions that health care systems use to address these needs, including exploring the potential unintended consequences of interventions.
METHODS
We conducted a modified Delphi panel informed by an environmental scan. Expert stakeholders included patients, interdisciplinary healthcare practitioners (physicians, social workers, peer navigators), implementation scientists, and policy makers. The environmental scan used a rapid literature review and semi-structured interviews with key informants who provide healthcare for high-need patients. We convened a day-long virtual panel meeting, preceded and followed by online surveys to establish consensus.
RESULTS
The environmental scan identified 46 systematic reviews on high-need patients, 19 empirical studies documenting needs, 14 intervention taxonomies, and 9 studies providing construct validity for the concept "high need." Panelists explored the construct and terminology and established that individual patients' needs are unique, but areas of commonality exist across all high-need patients. Panelists agreed on 11 domains describing patient (e.g., social circumstances), 5 care professional (e.g., communication), and 8 organizational (e.g., staffing arrangements) needs. Panelists developed a taxonomy of interventions with 15 categories (e.g., care navigation, care coordination, identification and monitoring) directed at patients, care professionals, or the organization. The project identified potentially unintended consequences of interventions for high-need patients, including high costs incurred for patients, increased time and effort for care professionals, and identification of needs without resources to respond appropriately.
CONCLUSIONS
Care for high-need patients requires a thoughtful approach; differentiating need domains provides multiple entry points for interventions directed at patients, care professionals, and organizations. Implementation efforts should consider outlined intended and unintended downstream effects on patients, care professionals, and organizations.
目的
本研究旨在探索“高需求”的概念结构,确定高需求患者、其护理专业人员和医疗机构共有的常见需求领域;并描述医疗系统用于满足这些需求的干预措施,包括探索干预措施的潜在意外后果。
方法
我们采用改良 Delphi 小组法,并结合环境扫描进行研究。专家利益相关者包括患者、跨学科医疗保健从业者(医生、社会工作者、同伴导航员)、实施科学家和政策制定者。环境扫描使用快速文献综述和对为高需求患者提供医疗服务的主要知情人的半结构化访谈。我们召开了为期一天的虚拟小组会议,会前和会后进行了在线调查以达成共识。
结果
环境扫描确定了 46 篇关于高需求患者的系统评价、19 篇记录需求的实证研究、14 项干预分类和 9 项为“高需求”概念提供结构有效性的研究。小组成员探讨了概念和术语,并确定了所有高需求患者都存在个体患者需求独特但也存在共同领域。小组成员就 11 个描述患者(例如社会环境)、5 个护理专业人员(例如沟通)和 8 个组织(例如人员配置安排)需求的领域达成一致。小组成员制定了一个干预措施分类法,其中包括 15 个类别(例如护理导航、护理协调、识别和监测),针对患者、护理专业人员或组织。该项目确定了干预措施对高需求患者可能产生的意外后果,包括患者承担的高成本、护理专业人员投入的时间和精力增加,以及在没有资源做出适当回应的情况下识别需求。
结论
高需求患者的护理需要深思熟虑;区分需求领域为针对患者、护理专业人员和组织的干预措施提供了多个切入点。实施工作应考虑对患者、护理专业人员和组织产生的预期和意外的下游影响。