抑郁症的孟德尔随机化研究:证据、机遇与挑战。

Mendelian randomization studies of depression: evidence, opportunities, and challenges.

作者信息

Ma Wang-Ran, Zhang Lei-Lei, Ma Jing-Ying, Yu Fang, Hou Ya-Qing, Feng Xiang-Rui, Yang Lin

机构信息

Xian Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 710021, China.

Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, 712046, China.

出版信息

Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 23;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12991-023-00479-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) poses a significant social and economic burden worldwide. Identifying exposures, risk factors, and biological mechanisms that are causally connected to MDD can help build a scientific basis for disease prevention and development of novel therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we assessed the evidence for causal relationships between putative causal risk factors and MDD from Mendelian randomization (MR) studies, following PRISMA. We assessed methodological quality based on key elements of the MR design: use of a full instrumental variable analysis and validation of the three key MR assumptions.

RESULTS

We included methodological details and results from 52 articles. A causal link between lifestyle, metabolic, inflammatory biomarkers, particular pathological states and MDD is supported by MR investigations, although results for each category varied substantially.

CONCLUSIONS

While this review shows how MR can offer useful information for examining prospective treatment targets and better understanding the pathophysiology of MDD, some methodological flaws in the existing literature limit reliability of results and probably underlie their heterogeneity. We highlight perspectives and recommendations for future works on MR in psychiatry.

摘要

背景

重度抑郁症(MDD)在全球范围内造成了重大的社会和经济负担。确定与MDD有因果关系的暴露因素、风险因素和生物学机制,有助于为疾病预防和新型治疗方法的开发奠定科学基础。

方法

在这项系统评价中,我们按照PRISMA流程,评估孟德尔随机化(MR)研究中假定的因果风险因素与MDD之间因果关系的证据。我们基于MR设计的关键要素评估方法学质量:使用完整的工具变量分析以及对MR三个关键假设的验证。

结果

我们纳入了52篇文章的方法学细节和结果。MR研究支持生活方式、代谢、炎症生物标志物、特定病理状态与MDD之间存在因果联系,尽管每个类别的结果差异很大。

结论

虽然本综述展示了MR如何为研究前瞻性治疗靶点和更好地理解MDD的病理生理学提供有用信息,但现有文献中的一些方法学缺陷限制了结果的可靠性,可能也是其异质性的原因。我们强调了未来精神病学中MR研究的观点和建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/246a/10666459/8a91123fdd0b/12991_2023_479_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索