Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02141-4.
System-wide, comprehensive, primary health care (PHC)-oriented health reforms are infrequently introduced in low-income and middle-income countries and often poorly studied. China initiated a large-scale reform in 2015 that included multiple policies: partial gatekeeping, a family physician scheme, and increased system integration. These policies aimed to build a PHC-oriented health system and improve primary care utilisation. This study assessed the heterogeneous effects of the reforms on health service utilisation and health outcomes across regions and over time.
In this longitudinal quasi-experimental study, we used longitudinal data (2011-18) from a national survey on elderly populations and governmental yearbooks. This study exploits the staggered rollout of the reforms at the city level identified using web-scrapping. We employed an event study design to assess reform effects on (1) visits to PHC facilities, (2) admissions to hospital, (3) out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPEs), and (4) self-reported health. Models were adjusted for city and time fixed effects, along with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics at individual and provincial levels. Analysis was separated into rural and urban populations.
18 988 Chinese individuals aged 45 and older (mean age 60·4 years [SD 10·3], 9990 [52·6%] women, 8998 [47·4%] men) were included in the analysis. The reform was associated with increasing odds of visiting PHC facilities among rural populations, which became stronger in the 2 years after the reform (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·02-1·84, p=0·0374; absolute effect sizes [probability] 3%) before it faded. Meanwhile, urban populations were unaffected (from aOR 1·22, 0·82-1·81 to 0·89, 0·50-1·57). The reform did not have a significant effect on admission to hospital (rural: from 0·97, 0·72-1·31 to 1·47, 0·85-2·55; urban: from 1·00, 0·69-1·43 to 1·59, 0·76-3·30) or OOPEs (rural: from 260·32 Chinese Yuan, 95% CI -6·34 to 526·97, to 693·07 Chinese Yuan, -102·96 to 1489·09; urban: from 235·37 Chinese Yuan, -405·10 to 875·83, to 859·93 Chinese Yuan, -199·02 to 1918·88). Urban populations reported higher self-reported health after the reforms than the year before the reforms (1·50, 1·12-2·01, p=0·0002; 5%).
System-wide PHC-oriented reforms might contribute to short-term increases in primary care utilisation in elderly populations with implications for urban-rural inequalities. Effects on financial protection and health inequality were limited. Efforts in improving the accessibility and quality of primary care in deprived areas are indispensable to addressing the persistent inverse care law and to achieving Universal Health Coverage for all countries.
None.
在中低收入国家,全面的、以初级卫生保健(PHC)为导向的卫生系统改革很少实施,且往往研究不足。中国于 2015 年启动了一项大规模改革,其中包括多项政策:部分守门人制度、家庭医生计划和系统整合增加。这些政策旨在建立以 PHC 为导向的卫生系统并提高初级保健利用率。本研究评估了改革对不同地区和不同时间的卫生服务利用和健康结果的异质影响。
本纵向准实验研究使用了来自国家老年人口调查和政府年鉴的纵向数据(2011-18 年)。本研究利用网络抓取确定的城市层面改革的交错推出,利用事件研究设计评估改革对(1)PHC 设施就诊、(2)住院、(3)自付支出(OOPEs)和(4)自我报告健康的影响。模型调整了城市和时间固定效应,以及个人和省级层面的人口统计学和社会经济特征。分析分为农村和城市人口。
共纳入 18988 名年龄在 45 岁及以上的中国个体(平均年龄 60.4 岁[标准差 10.3],9990 名[52.6%]女性,8998 名[47.4%]男性)。改革与农村人口 PHC 就诊率增加相关,改革后 2 年内效果更强(调整后的优势比[OR]1.35,95%置信区间[CI]1.02-1.84,p=0.0374;概率绝对值[可能性]3%),之后效果减弱。与此同时,城市人口没有受到影响(从 OR 1.22,0.82-1.81 到 0.89,0.50-1.57)。改革对住院治疗(农村:从 0.97,0.72-1.31 到 1.47,0.85-2.55;城市:从 1.00,0.69-1.43 到 1.59,0.76-3.30)或 OOPEs(农村:从 260.32 元人民币,95%CI-6.34 元人民币至 526.97 元人民币,至 693.07 元人民币,-102.96 元人民币至 1489.09 元人民币;城市:从 235.37 元人民币,-405.10 元人民币至 875.83 元人民币,至 859.93 元人民币,-199.02 元人民币至 1918.88 元人民币)没有显著影响。改革后,城市人口的自我报告健康状况优于改革前一年(1.50,1.12-2.01,p=0.0002;可能性 5%)。
全面的、以初级卫生保健为导向的卫生系统改革可能有助于提高老年人口对初级保健的短期利用率,这对城乡不平等产生影响。对财务保护和健康不平等的影响有限。在贫困地区改善初级保健的可及性和质量的努力对于解决持续存在的逆向医疗保健规律和实现全民健康覆盖所有国家至关重要。
无。