Cai Chang, Millett Christopher, Xiong Shangzhi, Tian Maoyi, Xu Jin, Hone Thomas
Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Public Health Research Centre and Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 23;3(1):e001595. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001595. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Comprehensive health reforms aimed at strengthening primary healthcare (PHC) are infrequently adopted and often poorly evaluated in low-income and middle-income countries. China launched a system-wide PHC reform with a staggered roll-out between 2014 and 2018 with multiple components: (1) gatekeeping via tiered reimbursement, (2) a family physician scheme and (3) a two-way referral system between PHC facilities and hospitals. This study examines the reform impacts on health service utilisation, out-of-pocket expenditures, health outcomes and health inequalities.
The staggered roll-out of the reforms in 125 cities across China was identified using web-scraping. Using longitudinal data (2011-2018) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (a cohort aged ≥45), this study adopted a difference-in-differences method to assess the reform's impacts on: (1) visits to PHC facilities, (2) hospitalisation, (3) out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPEs) and (4) self-reported health. Subgroup analyses were conducted by rural/urban populations and wealth quartiles.
The reform had small and short-lived impacts-a 7.8% increase in the probability of visiting PHC facilities (95% CI 0.3 to 15.2), a 10.2% increase in reporting good health (95% CI 0.6 to 19.8) and an 873.9 Chinese Yuan (US$129.1) increase in average annual OOPEs (95% CI 57.9 to 1689.9) in the first year of reform implementation. There was no impact on hospitalisation. Increases in PHC utilisation were only found in rural and lower-income populations.
China's PHC reforms had some modest, temporary impacts on increasing primary care utilisation and self-reported health. However, further interventions are needed to transition away from the hospital-centric health system and to increase financial protection and health equity in China.
旨在加强初级卫生保健(PHC)的全面卫生改革在低收入和中等收入国家很少被采用,而且往往评估不足。中国在2014年至2018年期间分阶段推出了一项全系统的初级卫生保健改革,包括多个组成部分:(1)通过分级报销进行守门,(2)家庭医生计划,以及(3)初级卫生保健机构与医院之间的双向转诊系统。本研究考察了该改革对卫生服务利用、自付费用、健康结果和健康不平等的影响。
通过网络抓取确定了中国125个城市改革的分阶段推出情况。利用中国健康与养老追踪调查(年龄≥45岁的队列)的纵向数据(2011 - 2018年),本研究采用差分法评估改革对以下方面的影响:(1)到初级卫生保健机构就诊,(2)住院,(3)自付费用(OOPEs),以及(4)自我报告的健康状况。按农村/城市人口和财富四分位数进行亚组分析。
改革产生了微小且短暂的影响——改革实施的第一年,到初级卫生保健机构就诊的概率增加了7.8%(95%置信区间0.3至15.2),报告健康状况良好的比例增加了10.2%(95%置信区间0.6至19.8),平均每年的自付费用增加了873.9元人民币(129.1美元)(95%置信区间57.9至1689.9)。对住院没有影响。仅在农村和低收入人群中发现初级卫生保健利用率有所提高。
中国的初级卫生保健改革对增加基层医疗服务利用和自我报告的健康状况产生了一些适度的、暂时的影响。然而,需要进一步干预,以从以医院为中心的卫生系统转型,并在中国提高财务保护和健康公平性。