• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价父母对舌系带和唇系带切除术的看法:比较 CO2 激光与传统手术刀。

Evaluation of parental perceptions of lingual and labial frenectomy on their child: a comparison of CO laser and conventional scalpel.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, 3109601 Haifa, Israel.

The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Institution of Technology, 3525433 Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;47(6):30-37. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.079. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2023.079
PMID:37997232
Abstract

To evaluate parental reports of postoperative pain, improvement and satisfaction following frenectomy with scalpel versus carbon dioxide (CO) laser treatment. Forty-nine patients aged 2-6 years with a short labial or lingual frenulum who required frenectomy were randomly assigned to undergo CO laser or scalpel treatment. They were divided into a labial and a lingual frenulum group based on the severity of attachment. Frenectomy was performed using a scalpel or Pixel CO 10,600 nm laser (Alma Lasers Company, Caesarea, Israel). Postoperative follow-up was conducted a mobile application where pain was evaluated daily using the visual analog scale (VAS) in the first 72 hours, and painkiller use was recorded. Improvement and satisfaction were evaluated at 1-month post-surgery and compared among the groups. Our results showed significant differences between the degree of clinical attachment of the frenulum, one-month postoperative improvement and satisfaction based on VAS scores ( < 0.001). Although the use of scalpel was associated with lower postoperative pain scores than the CO groups, VAS scores of improvement and satisfaction after 1 month were higher in the CO groups ( < 0.05). This study showed that although laser was associated with more postoperative pain, it showed greater improvement and higher satisfaction among patients' parents at 1 month post-surgery compared with scalpel.

摘要

评估 49 例 2-6 岁、存在短唇系带或舌系带的患儿接受手术剪或二氧化碳(CO)激光治疗后的父母报告的术后疼痛、改善和满意度。根据附着的严重程度,将患儿分为唇系带组和舌系带组。使用手术剪或 Pixel CO 10,600nm 激光(以色列 Caesarea 的 Alma Lasers 公司)进行系带切除术。术后通过移动应用程序随访,在最初的 72 小时内使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)每日评估疼痛,并记录止痛药的使用情况。在术后 1 个月评估改善和满意度,并比较各组之间的差异。我们的结果显示,根据 VAS 评分,系带的临床附着程度、术后 1 个月的改善和满意度存在显著差异(<0.001)。尽管与 CO 组相比,手术剪组的术后疼痛评分较低,但术后 1 个月的 VAS 评分改善和满意度更高(<0.05)。本研究表明,尽管激光治疗后疼痛更明显,但与手术剪相比,CO 激光治疗在术后 1 个月时患者父母的改善程度更高,满意度更高。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of parental perceptions of lingual and labial frenectomy on their child: a comparison of CO laser and conventional scalpel.评价父母对舌系带和唇系带切除术的看法:比较 CO2 激光与传统手术刀。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;47(6):30-37. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.079. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
2
Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: a comparison of carbon dioxide laser and scalpel techniques.系带切除术术后患者认知的评估:二氧化碳激光与手术刀技术的比较
J Periodontol. 2006 Nov;77(11):1815-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.060043.
3
Comparative frenectomy with conventional scalpel and dual-waved laser in labial frenulum.唇系带处传统手术刀与双波长激光对比性系带切除术
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan 11;5(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000363. eCollection 2022.
4
Maxillary labial frenectomy: a randomized, controlled comparative study of two blue (445 nm) and infrared (980 nm) diode lasers versus surgical scalpel.上颌唇系带切除术:两种蓝(445nm)和红外(980nm)二极管激光与手术手术刀的随机对照比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04364-w.
5
Use of carbon dioxide laser in lingual frenectomy.二氧化碳激光在舌系带切除术中的应用。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;49(7):580-1. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
6
Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: A comparison of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser and conventional techniques in the same patients.系带切除术患者术后认知的评估:钕掺杂钇铝石榴石激光与传统技术在同一患者中的比较。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;21(8):1059-1064. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_2_18.
7
Clinical Study of Laser Treatment for Frenectomy of Pediatric Patients.小儿患者唇系带切除术激光治疗的临床研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;10(3):272-277. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1449. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Evaluation of Patient's Perceptions, Healing, and Reattachment After Conventional and Diode Laser Frenectomy: A Three-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial.评价常规和二极管激光切开术治疗后患者的感知、愈合和再附着:一项三臂随机临床试验。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 Sep;38(9):552-559. doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4783. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
9
Effects of topically administered 0.6% hyaluronic acid on the healing of labial frenectomy in conventional and 940-nm indium gallium arsenide phosphide (InGaAsP) diode laser techniques in pediatric patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study.局部应用0.6%透明质酸对儿科患者采用传统及940纳米磷化铟镓砷(InGaAsP)二极管激光技术进行唇系带切除术愈合情况的影响:一项随机、安慰剂对照临床研究
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jan 27;39(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-03983-7.
10
Evaluation of the effect of the application of hyaluronic acid following laser-assisted frenectomy: an examiner-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study.激光辅助系带切除术联合透明质酸应用效果的评估:一项 examiner-blind、随机、对照临床研究 。 注:这里“examiner-blind”可能是“examiner-blinded”(研究者设盲)的错误表述。
Quintessence Int. 2020;51(3):188-201. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a43667.