• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应性行为量表认知三联征:对机构收容的成年智障者的辨别与分类

Adaptive Behavior Scale Cognitive Triad: discrimination and classification of institutionalized mentally retarded adults.

作者信息

McLaren K P, Richards H C

出版信息

Am J Ment Defic. 1986 Nov;91(3):304-7.

PMID:3799738
Abstract

The Leiter International Performance Scale, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, and the Cognitive Triad of the Adaptive Behavior Scale were used to assess the intellectual functioning of 77 institutionalized mentally retarded adults. On the basis of their IQs, 30 were categorized as profoundly, 21 as severely, and 16 as moderately retarded (10 were unclassifiable because the Leiter and Peabody yielded disparate scores). Discriminant analysis in which category membership was predicted on the basis of the Cognitive Triad measures (Economic Activity, Language Development, and Number and Time Concepts) correctly classified 78% of the cases. There were no instances in which profoundly and moderately retarded individuals were mutually misclassified. Results support the use of the Cognitive Triad as an alternative for classifying lower functioning retarded persons.

摘要

使用莱特尔国际操作量表、修订版皮博迪图片词汇测验和适应性行为量表的认知三联来评估77名机构收容的成年智力迟钝者的智力功能。根据他们的智商,30人被归类为极重度智力迟钝,21人为重度智力迟钝,16人为中度智力迟钝(10人无法分类,因为莱特尔和皮博迪测验得出的分数不一致)。基于认知三联测量(经济活动、语言发展以及数字和时间概念)预测类别归属的判别分析正确分类了78%的案例。没有极重度和中度智力迟钝个体相互误分类的情况。结果支持将认知三联用作对低功能智力迟钝者进行分类的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Adaptive Behavior Scale Cognitive Triad: discrimination and classification of institutionalized mentally retarded adults.适应性行为量表认知三联征:对机构收容的成年智障者的辨别与分类
Am J Ment Defic. 1986 Nov;91(3):304-7.
2
An attempt to assess and predict adaptive behavior of institutionalized mentally retarded clients.一项评估和预测机构收容的智力迟钝患者适应性行为的尝试。
Am J Ment Defic. 1980 Jan;84(4):406-10.
3
Contrasting adaptive behavior ratings of male and female institutionalized residents across two settings.
Am J Ment Defic. 1980 Jan;84(4):397-400.
4
The adaptive behavior scale: a study of criterion validity.适应性行为量表:效度标准研究
Am J Ment Defic. 1980 Jul;85(1):61-8.
5
Adaptive behavior scale differences in scores of mentally retarded individuals referred for institutionalization and those never referred.被转介至机构教养的智障人士与从未被转介的智障人士在适应行为量表得分上的差异。
Am J Ment Defic. 1982 Jan;86(4):425-8.
6
Classifying mental retardation and specific strength and deficit areas in severe and profoundly mentally retarded persons with the MESSIER.使用MESSIER对重度和极重度智力障碍者的智力迟钝以及特定优势和缺陷领域进行分类。
Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Jan-Feb;26(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.09.001.
7
Differential WAIS/WAIS-R IQ discrepancies among institutionalized mentally retarded persons.机构收容的智力迟钝者中韦氏成人智力量表/韦氏成人智力量表修订版智商差异
Am J Ment Defic. 1987 May;91(6):633-5.
8
Factor structure and correlates of adaptive behavior in noninstitutionalized retarded adults.非机构化智力迟钝成年人适应性行为的因素结构及其相关因素
Am J Ment Defic. 1976 Mar;80(5):543-7.
9
Behavior rating inventory for moderately, severely, and profoundly retarded persons.
Am J Ment Defic. 1978 Jan;82(4):365-74.
10
Learning, memory, and transfer in profoundly, severely, and moderately mentally retarded persons.重度、极重度和中度智力障碍者的学习、记忆及迁移能力
Am J Ment Defic. 1982 Sep;87(2):186-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III Form A in the Performance of Struggling Adult Readers: Rasch Modeling.针对阅读困难成年读者表现的皮博迪图片词汇测试第三版A式的结构效度与测量不变性:拉施模型
Lang Assess Q. 2012;9(2):152-171. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2011.613504. Epub 2012 May 7.