Frequency of cognitive "super-aging" in three Australian samples using different diagnostic criteria.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the frequency of exceptional cognition (cognitive super-aging) in Australian older adults using different published definitions, agreement between definitions, and the relationship of super-aging status with function, brain imaging markers, and incident dementia.

DESIGN

Three longitudinal cohort studies.

SETTING

Participants recruited from the electoral roll, Australian Twins Registry, and community advertisements.

PARTICIPANTS

Older adults (aged 65-106) without dementia from the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study ( = 1037; median age 78), Older Australian Twins Study ( = 361; median age 68), and Sydney Centenarian Study ( = 217; median age 97).

MEASUREMENTS

Frequency of super-aging was assessed using nine super-aging definitions based on performance on neuropsychological testing. Levels of agreement between definitions were calculated, and associations between super-aging status for each definition and functioning (Bayer ADL score), structural brain imaging measures, and incident dementia were explored.

RESULTS

Frequency of super-aging varied between 2.9 and 43.4 percent with more stringent definitions associated with lower frequency. Agreement between different criteria varied from poor (K = 0.04, AC1 = .24) to very good (K = 0.83, AC1 = .91) with better agreement between definitions using similar tests and cutoffs. Super-aging was associated with better functional performance (4.7-11%) and lower rates of incident dementia (hazard ratios 0.08-0.48) for most definitions. Super-aging status was associated with a lower burden of white matter hyperintensities (3.8-33.2%) for all definitions.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of super-aging is strongly affected by the demographic and neuropsychological testing parameters used. Greater consistency in defining super-aging would enable better characterization of this exceptional minority.