Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2108-2115. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16033. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
Telephone-based cognitive screens, such as the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), can potentially reduce the barriers and costs of assessing older adults. However, validation of clinically relevant psychometric properties is lacking in a large and comprehensively assessed sample of older adults. Furthermore, published normative data may lack sensitivity as they have not used regression-based demographic corrections or accounted for cases with subsequent dementia. We address these gaps using the modified TICS (TICS-M; a modified, 13-item, 39-point version) and provide an online norms calculator for clinicians and researchers.
Prospective longitudinal study.
Sydney, Australia.
A total of 617 community-living older adults, aged from 71 to 91 years.
The measures used included the TICS-M, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R), and a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Descriptive statistics, correlations, area under the curve, and regression analyses were used to determine the validity and normative properties of the TICS-M.
TICS-M total scores (mean = 24.20; SD = 3.76) correlated well with the MMSE (0.70) and ACE-R (0.80) and moderately with neuropsychological tests tested noncontemporaneously. A cutoff score of 21 or lower reliably distinguished between those with and without incident dementia after 1 year (sensitivity = 77%; specificity = 88%) but was less reliable at distinguishing mild cognitive impairment from normal cognition. TICS-M scores decreased with age and increased with higher education levels. The robust normative sample, which excluded incident dementia cases, scored higher on the TICS-M and with less variability than the whole sample. An online calculator is provided to compute regression-based norms and reliable change statistics.
In a large sample of community-dwelling older adults, the TICS-M performed well in terms of construct validity against typical screening tools and neuropsychological measures and diagnostic validity for incident dementia. The comprehensive, regression-based, and robust normative data provided will help improve the sensitivity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of cognitive testing with older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2108-2115, 2019.
基于电话的认知筛查,如电话认知状态测试(TICS),可能会降低评估老年人的障碍和成本。然而,在大量全面评估的老年人样本中,缺乏与临床相关的心理测量学特性的验证。此外,发表的规范数据可能缺乏敏感性,因为它们没有使用基于回归的人口统计学校正,也没有考虑到随后患有痴呆症的病例。我们使用改良的 TICS(TICS-M;一种改良的、包含 13 项内容、39 个要点的版本)解决了这些差距,并为临床医生和研究人员提供了在线规范计算器。
前瞻性纵向研究。
澳大利亚悉尼。
共有 617 名居住在社区的老年人,年龄在 71 至 91 岁之间。
使用的测量方法包括 TICS-M、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、改良的 Addenbrooke 认知测验修订版(ACE-R)以及全面的神经心理学测试组合。使用描述性统计、相关性、曲线下面积和回归分析来确定 TICS-M 的有效性和规范特性。
TICS-M 总分(平均值=24.20;标准差=3.76)与 MMSE(0.70)和 ACE-R(0.80)高度相关,与非同期进行的神经心理学测试中度相关。21 分或更低的得分可以可靠地区分 1 年后是否发生痴呆(敏感性=77%;特异性=88%),但在区分轻度认知障碍与正常认知方面的可靠性较低。TICS-M 评分随年龄增长而降低,随教育程度提高而升高。排除新发痴呆病例的强大规范样本在 TICS-M 上的得分更高,且变异程度更小。提供了在线计算器,用于计算基于回归的规范和可靠变化统计数据。
在一个大型的社区居住的老年人样本中,TICS-M 在与典型的筛查工具和神经心理学测量以及新发痴呆的诊断有效性方面表现出良好的结构有效性。提供的全面、基于回归的、强大的规范数据将有助于提高认知测试在老年人中的敏感性、可及性和成本效益。