• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

洛拉替尼作为间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌成人患者的一线治疗:在希腊的成本效益分析。

Lorlatinib as a first-line treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Α cost-effectiveness analysis in Greece.

机构信息

Health Through Evidence, Athens, Greece.

Pfizer Hellas, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Mar;24(3):375-385. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2288249. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2023.2288249
PMID:37997764
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lorlatinib compared to 1 generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) TKI crizotinib, and 2 generation TKIs alectinib and brigatinib, for previously untreated patients with ALK+ advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC).

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was locally adapted from a Greek payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Clinical, safety and utility data were extracted from literature. Direct medical costs reflecting the year 2023 were included in the analysis (€). Model outcomes were patients' life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

Total cost per patient with lorlatinib, alectinib, crizotinib, and brigatinib was estimated to be €188,205, €183,343, €75,028, and €145,454 respectively. Lorlatinib appeared to yield more LYs and QALYs gained versus alectinib, crizotinib, and brigatinib. Hence, lorlatinib resulted in ICERs of €4,315 per LY gained and €4,422 per QALY gained compared to alectinib, €34,032 per LY gained and €48,256 per QALY gained versus crizotinib and €16,587 per LY gained and €26,271 per QALY gained compared to brigatinib.

CONCLUSION

Lorlatinib provides substantial clinical benefit and appears to be a cost - effective treatment option compared to 1 and 2 generation TKIs for previously untreated patients with ALK+ aNCSLC in Greece.

摘要

目的

评估洛拉替尼与第一代间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)TKI 克唑替尼,以及第二代 TKI 阿来替尼和布加替尼相比,用于未经治疗的 ALK+晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)患者的成本效益。

方法

从希腊支付者的角度,基于终生时间范围,对生存分割模型进行了局部适应性调整。从文献中提取临床、安全性和效用数据。分析中包括反映 2023 年的直接医疗成本(€)。模型结果为患者的生命年(LYs)、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、总费用和增量成本效益比(ICERs)。

结果

洛拉替尼、阿来替尼、克唑替尼和布加替尼每位患者的总费用估计分别为€188205、€183343、€75028 和€145454。与阿来替尼、克唑替尼和布加替尼相比,洛拉替尼似乎能获得更多的 LYs 和 QALYs。因此,洛拉替尼的 ICER 分别为 4315 欧元/LY 获益和 4422 欧元/QALY 获益,与阿来替尼相比,34032 欧元/LY 获益和 48256 欧元/QALY 获益,与克唑替尼相比,16587 欧元/LY 获益和 26271 欧元/QALY 获益,与布加替尼相比。

结论

在希腊,与第一代和第二代 TKI 相比,洛拉替尼为未经治疗的 ALK+晚期 NSCLC 患者提供了显著的临床获益,并且看起来是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Lorlatinib as a first-line treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Α cost-effectiveness analysis in Greece.洛拉替尼作为间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌成人患者的一线治疗:在希腊的成本效益分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Mar;24(3):375-385. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2288249. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
2
Cost-effectiveness of ensartinib, crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer in China.恩沙替尼、克唑替尼、塞瑞替尼、阿来替尼、布加替尼和劳拉替尼治疗中国间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌患者的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:985834. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.985834. eCollection 2022.
3
Cost‑Effectiveness of Lorlatinib in First-Line Treatment of Adult Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)‑Positive Non‑Small‑Cell Lung Cancer in Sweden.洛拉替尼在瑞典一线治疗间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌成人患者中的成本效益分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Jul;21(4):661-672. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00807-7. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
The cost-effectiveness of brigatinib in adult patients with ALK inhibitor-naive ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer from a US perspective.从美国视角评估布加替尼在未经ALK 抑制剂治疗的 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌成年患者中的成本效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):970-979. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.970.
5
Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line use of brigatinib followed by lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.在ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌患者中一线与二线使用布加替尼后再使用劳拉替尼的成本效益
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 15;12:1213318. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1213318. eCollection 2024.
6
Identifying optimal ALK inhibitors in first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.识别晚期 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌一线和二线治疗中最优的 ALK 抑制剂:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11916-4.
7
Comparison of lorlatinib, alectinib and brigatinib in ALK inhibitor-naive/untreated ALK-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.劳拉替尼、阿来替尼和布加替尼在初治/未治疗的ALK阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌中的比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Chemother. 2022 Apr;34(2):87-96. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2021.1937782. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
Brigatinib and lorlatinib: their effect on ALK inhibitors in NSCLC focusing on resistant mutations and central nervous system metastases.布加替尼和劳拉替尼:它们对非小细胞肺癌中 ALK 抑制剂的影响,重点关注耐药突变和中枢神经系统转移。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;51(1):37-44. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa192.
9
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece.劳拉替尼在希腊接受间变性淋巴瘤激酶抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中的成本效益分析。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022 Feb 17;9(1):50-57. doi: 10.36469/jheor.2022.32983. eCollection 2022.
10
Treatment sequencing after failure to alectinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.阿来替尼治疗失败后的治疗顺序:间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌。
Cancer Sci. 2024 Mar;115(3):926-936. doi: 10.1111/cas.16056. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 6 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment for ALK-Positive NSCLC in China.6种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂作为中国ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益分析
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024 May 31;18:11795549241257234. doi: 10.1177/11795549241257234. eCollection 2024.