Suppr超能文献

热带高原放牧奶牛血浆和毛细血管血糖测量两种方法的比较

Comparison of Two Methods for the Measurement of Blood Plasma and Capillary Blood Glucose in Tropical Highland Grassing Dairy Cows.

作者信息

López Catalina, Hincapié Valentina, Carmona Jorge U

机构信息

Grupo de Investigación Patología Clínica Veterinaria, Departamento de Salud Animal, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No 26-10, Manizales 170004, Colombia.

Grupo de Investigación Terapia Regenerativa, Departamento de Salud Animal, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No 26-10, Manizales 170004, Colombia.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 16;13(22):3536. doi: 10.3390/ani13223536.

Abstract

(1) Background: There is lack of published studies validating specific cow-side glucometers such as Centrivet GK (CVGK). (2) Methods: The aims were (1) to measure and compare the blood glucose concentrations in 52 tropic highland grassing cows by using CVGK and the traditional enzymatic/photometric assay (EPA) in plasma and serum (reference method) and (2) to establish if glucose concentrations obtained via these methods could be affected by several demographic and zootechnical parameters of the dairy herd evaluated. (3) Results: Glucose concentrations were significantly ( = 0.00) affected by the method used for their measurement. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) for glucose concentrations in plasma EPA and for CVGK was 14% for both methods with serum EPA, whereas the inter-assay CV for plasma EPA and CVGK was 8% and 13.7%, respectively, with serum EPA. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations between the reference method in serum and plasma presented a slightly positive significant ( = <0.000) correlation (r = 0.56), whereas there was not a significant ( = 0.413) correlation between serum EPA and CVGK (r = 0.135). The Passing and Bablok regressions were out of the ideal expected values for the slope (β = 1) and the intercept (α = 0) (11), whereas the Bland-Altman plots showed a bias of 5.29 ± 11.73 (mg/dL) for serum and plasma and 11.01 ± 15.74 (mg/dL) for serum and CVGK. The ROC curve showed no sensitivity in detecting normoglycemic cows (area = 53.7 %, e.d = 12.5 %, = 0.759) for CVGK when compared to plasma EPA (area = 36.1 %, e.d = 14.2 %, = 0.256). Plasma EPA exhibited a better but not significant effect in detecting hyperglycemic cows (area = 63.9%, e.d = 14.2%, = 0.256) when compared to HHD (area = 46.3 %, e.d = 12.5 %, = 0.759). General glucose concentrations, independently of the method used, were significantly ( = <0.001) greater in young cows when compared to adult and old cows. (4) Conclusions: Glucose concentration measurement in plasma by using EPA or in capillary blood via CVGK were not reliable methods when compared with the reference method.

摘要

(1) 背景:缺乏已发表的研究来验证特定的现场血糖仪,如Centrivet GK(CVGK)。(2) 方法:目的是(1) 通过使用CVGK和传统的酶促/比色法(EPA)测量并比较52头热带高地放牧奶牛血浆和血清中的血糖浓度(参考方法),以及(2) 确定通过这些方法获得的葡萄糖浓度是否会受到所评估奶牛群的几个群体统计学和畜牧学参数的影响。(3) 结果:葡萄糖浓度受到测量方法的显著(P = 0.00)影响。血浆EPA和CVGK测量葡萄糖浓度的批内变异系数(CV)对于两种方法而言,血清EPA的均为14%,而血浆EPA和CVGK的批间CV分别为8%和13.7%。血清和血浆中参考方法之间的Pearson相关系数计算呈现出略微正相关且显著(P = <0.000)(r = 0.56),而血清EPA和CVGK之间不存在显著(P = 0.413)相关性(r = 0.135)。Passing和Bablok回归超出了斜率(β = 1)和截距(α = 0)的理想预期值(11),而Bland - Altman图显示血清和血浆之间的偏差为5.29 ± 11.73(mg/dL),血清和CVGK之间的偏差为11.01 ± 15.74(mg/dL)。与血浆EPA(面积 = 36.1%,标准误 = 14.2%,P = 0.256)相比,CVGK检测血糖正常奶牛时的ROC曲线显示无敏感性(面积 = 53.7%,标准误 = 12.5%,P = 0.759)。与HHD(面积 = 46.3%,标准误 = 12.5%,P = 0.759)相比,血浆EPA在检测高血糖奶牛时表现出更好但不显著的效果(面积 = 63.9%,标准误 = 14.2%,P = 0.256)。与成年和老年奶牛相比,无论使用何种方法,年轻奶牛的总体葡萄糖浓度均显著(P = <0.001)更高。(4) 结论:与参考方法相比,使用EPA测量血浆中的葡萄糖浓度或通过CVGK测量毛细血管血中的葡萄糖浓度并非可靠方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38eb/10668638/3e6c73e9dbef/animals-13-03536-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验