• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恶性淋巴瘤的DNA分级。I. 预后意义、可重复性及与其他分类方法的比较。

DNA-grading of malignant lymphomas. I. Prognostic significance, reproducibility and comparison with other classifications.

作者信息

Böcking A, Chatelain R, Auffermann W, Krüger G R, Asmus B, Wohltmann D, Schuster C

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 1986 Sep-Oct;6(5):1205-16.

PMID:3800327
Abstract

The prognostic significance of the DNA Malignancy Grade (DNA-MG) was tested for 83 malignant non Hodgkin lymphoma patients in comparison with three different subjective morphological classification systems (New Working Formulation for Clinical Usage, Rappaport and Kiel Classification). Monolayer smears prepared from paraffin embedded tissue and imprint smears from fresh cut lymph-nodes were investigated. Feulgen staining was performed automatically. The scalar DNA-MG was determined by rapid interactive DNA-cytometry, using an automatic microscope and a TV-image analysis system. A strong influence of the DNA-MG on length of survival was found. Compared with morphological classification systems, the DNA-MG was of greater prognostic validity as revealed by different statistical tests. Significant differences of survival probabilities between some groups with differences of 0.5 DNA-MG only were found. The interobserver reproducibility of this new prognostic index was found to be 95% within a range of +/-0.4 DNA-MG.

摘要

对83例恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者进行了DNA恶性程度分级(DNA-MG)的预后意义测试,并与三种不同的主观形态学分类系统(临床应用新工作方案、Rappaport分类和Kiel分类)进行比较。研究了从石蜡包埋组织制备的单层涂片和新鲜切除淋巴结的印片。自动进行Feulgen染色。使用自动显微镜和电视图像分析系统,通过快速交互式DNA细胞计数法确定标量DNA-MG。发现DNA-MG对生存时间有强烈影响。与形态学分类系统相比,不同的统计测试表明DNA-MG具有更高的预后有效性。仅在DNA-MG相差0.5的一些组之间发现了生存概率的显著差异。发现该新预后指标在±0.4 DNA-MG范围内的观察者间再现性为95%。

相似文献

1
DNA-grading of malignant lymphomas. I. Prognostic significance, reproducibility and comparison with other classifications.恶性淋巴瘤的DNA分级。I. 预后意义、可重复性及与其他分类方法的比较。
Anticancer Res. 1986 Sep-Oct;6(5):1205-16.
2
DNA-grading of malignant lymphomas. II. Correlation with clinical parameters.恶性淋巴瘤的DNA分级。II. 与临床参数的相关性。
Anticancer Res. 1986 Sep-Oct;6(5):1217-23.
3
Flow cytometric S-phase fraction as a complementary biological parameter for the cytological grading of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.流式细胞术检测的S期细胞分数作为非霍奇金淋巴瘤细胞学分级的补充生物学参数。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Oct;29(4):194-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.10298.
4
DNA-grading of prostatic carcinoma: prognostic validity and reproducibility.前列腺癌的DNA分级:预后有效性和可重复性
Anticancer Res. 1988 Jan-Feb;8(1):129-35.
5
Prognostic and predictive evaluation of DNA content, S-phase fraction and immunophenotyping in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in adults. A prospective study.
Pol J Pathol. 1999;50(1):23-9.
6
DNA grading of malignancy in breast cancer. Prognostic validity, reproducibility and comparison with other classifications.乳腺癌的DNA恶性程度分级。预后有效性、可重复性及与其他分类方法的比较。
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1989 Apr;11(2):73-80.
7
[Reproducibility and prognostic value of histopathological classifications of malignant lymphomas. Prolegomena for the 1st international classification proposed by WHO. Group of the non-Hodgkin's Malignant Lymphoma Classification Project].[恶性淋巴瘤组织病理学分类的可重复性及预后价值。世界卫生组织提出的首个国际分类的绪论。非霍奇金恶性淋巴瘤分类项目组]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 1998;182(7):1537-48; discussion 1548-9.
8
[Non-Hodgkin lymphomas. New histological, cytological and prognostic correlations (author's transl)].
Nouv Presse Med. 1981 Jun 20;10(27):2267-71.
9
Comparative cytophotometric analysis of reactive lymphoid hyperplasia and low malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma.反应性淋巴组织增生与低恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较细胞光度分析
Anticancer Res. 1998 May-Jun;18(3A):1613-6.
10
[Clinical relevance of the Kiel classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (author's transl)].
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1980 Aug 1;92(15):520-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Interobserver variation in cell selection for DNA image cytometry.DNA图像细胞计量术中细胞选择的观察者间差异。
J Clin Pathol. 1995 Jul;48(7):616-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.7.616.
2
Diagnostic and prognostic value of DNA image cytometry in myelodysplasia.DNA图像细胞计量术在骨髓发育异常中的诊断和预后价值
J Clin Pathol. 1988 Jun;41(6):604-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.6.604.