Suppr超能文献

本土化数据:数据经济中的流动与增值。

Domesticating data: Traveling and value-making in the data economy.

机构信息

University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Jun;54(3):429-450. doi: 10.1177/03063127231212506. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

Abstract

Data are versatile objects that can travel across contexts. While data's travels have been widely discussed, little attention has been paid to the sites from where and to which data flow. Drawing upon ethnographic fieldwork in two connected data-intensive laboratories and the concept of domestication, we explore what it takes to bring data 'home' into the laboratory. As data come and dwell in the home, they are made to follow rituals, and as a result, data are reshaped and form ties with the laboratory and its practitioners. We identify four main ways of domesticating data. First, through about the data's origins, data practitioners draw the boundaries of their laboratory. Second, through , staff transform samples into digital data that can travel well while ruling what data can be let into the home. Third, through , data practitioners become familiar with their data and at the same time imprint the data, thus making them belong to their home. Finally, through , staff turn data into a resource for knowledge production. Through the lens of domestication, we see the data economy as a collection of homes connected by flows, and it is because data are tamed and attached to homes that they become valuable knowledge tools. Such domestication practices also have broad implications for staff, who in the process of 'homing' data, come to belong to the laboratory. To conclude, we reflect on what these domestication processes-which silence unusual behaviours in the data-mean for the knowledge produced in data-intensive research.

摘要

数据是多功能的,可以在不同的环境中传递。尽管数据的传递已经被广泛讨论,但很少有人关注数据的来源和流向。本研究通过在两个相互关联的数据密集型实验室进行民族志实地调查,并借鉴驯化的概念,探讨了将数据“引入”实验室的条件。当数据进入并驻留在实验室时,它们需要遵循一定的仪式,从而被重塑,并与实验室及其从业人员建立联系。我们确定了驯化数据的四种主要方式。首先,通过了解数据的来源,数据从业人员划定了实验室的边界。其次,通过筛选,工作人员将样本转化为可以很好地传输的数据,同时规定了哪些数据可以进入实验室。第三,通过熟悉数据,数据从业人员了解了数据,同时也给数据打上了实验室的烙印,使数据成为实验室的一部分。最后,通过重新包装,工作人员将数据转化为知识生产的资源。通过驯化的视角,我们可以将数据经济视为一个由流动连接的家园集合,只有当数据被驯服并依附于家园时,它们才成为有价值的知识工具。这些驯化实践也对工作人员产生了广泛的影响,因为在“引入”数据的过程中,他们也逐渐成为实验室的一部分。最后,我们反思了这些驯化过程——这些过程使数据中的异常行为沉默——对数据密集型研究中产生的知识意味着什么。

相似文献

1
Domesticating data: Traveling and value-making in the data economy.
Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Jun;54(3):429-450. doi: 10.1177/03063127231212506. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
2
The domestication of remote monitoring: The materialisation of care?
J Aging Stud. 2023 Dec;67:101168. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101168. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
The social life of biomedical data: Capturing, obscuring, and envisioning care in the digital safety-net.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;294:114670. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114670. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
Nurses' experiences of ethnographic fieldwork.
Nurse Res. 2014 Sep;22(1):14-9. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.1.14.e1243.
6
"If no one grieves, no one will remember": Cultural palimpsests and the creation of social ties through rituals.
Br J Sociol. 2022 Mar;73(2):244-258. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12934. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
8
Theorizing eldercare work: An orders of worth analysis.
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2020 Apr-Jun;39(2):107-125. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2020.1740130. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Material Citizenship: An ethnographic study exploring object-person relations in the context of people with dementia in care homes.
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Jul;43(6):1471-1485. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13321. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
10
'I do not feel well here as such. But it has become my home': abandonment and care in healing shrines.
Anthropol Med. 2023 Sep;30(3):278-293. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2023.2171237. Epub 2023 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Renting Valuable Assets: Knowledge and Value Production in Academic Science.
Sci Technol Human Values. 2021 Mar 1;46(2):275-297. doi: 10.1177/0162243920911974. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
2
E-Infrastructures and the divergent assetization of public health data: Expectations, uncertainties, and asymmetries.
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Aug;51(4):606-627. doi: 10.1177/0306312721989818. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.
Sci Technol Human Values. 2010 Jul 1;35(4):444-473. doi: 10.1177/0162243909345836. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
4
Caring for data: Value creation in a data-intensive research laboratory.
Soc Stud Sci. 2020 Apr;50(2):175-197. doi: 10.1177/0306312720906567. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Courtesy work: Care practices for quality assurance in a cohort study.
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Aug;49(4):583-604. doi: 10.1177/0306312719863139.
6
Metadata accounts: Achieving data and evidence in scientific research.
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Oct;49(5):732-757. doi: 10.1177/0306312719863494. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
7
Data-work and friction: Investigating the practices of repurposing healthcare data.
Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):558-566. doi: 10.1177/1460458219856462. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
8
Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change.
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Oct;47(5):703-750. doi: 10.1177/0306312717709363. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology.
Big Data Soc. 2014 Jun 1;1(1). doi: 10.1177/2053951714534395.
10
Introduction: Making sense of data-driven research in the biological and biomedical sciences.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Mar;43(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验