• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本土化数据:数据经济中的流动与增值。

Domesticating data: Traveling and value-making in the data economy.

机构信息

University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Jun;54(3):429-450. doi: 10.1177/03063127231212506. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1177/03063127231212506
PMID:38006306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11119098/
Abstract

Data are versatile objects that can travel across contexts. While data's travels have been widely discussed, little attention has been paid to the sites from where and to which data flow. Drawing upon ethnographic fieldwork in two connected data-intensive laboratories and the concept of domestication, we explore what it takes to bring data 'home' into the laboratory. As data come and dwell in the home, they are made to follow rituals, and as a result, data are reshaped and form ties with the laboratory and its practitioners. We identify four main ways of domesticating data. First, through about the data's origins, data practitioners draw the boundaries of their laboratory. Second, through , staff transform samples into digital data that can travel well while ruling what data can be let into the home. Third, through , data practitioners become familiar with their data and at the same time imprint the data, thus making them belong to their home. Finally, through , staff turn data into a resource for knowledge production. Through the lens of domestication, we see the data economy as a collection of homes connected by flows, and it is because data are tamed and attached to homes that they become valuable knowledge tools. Such domestication practices also have broad implications for staff, who in the process of 'homing' data, come to belong to the laboratory. To conclude, we reflect on what these domestication processes-which silence unusual behaviours in the data-mean for the knowledge produced in data-intensive research.

摘要

数据是多功能的,可以在不同的环境中传递。尽管数据的传递已经被广泛讨论,但很少有人关注数据的来源和流向。本研究通过在两个相互关联的数据密集型实验室进行民族志实地调查,并借鉴驯化的概念,探讨了将数据“引入”实验室的条件。当数据进入并驻留在实验室时,它们需要遵循一定的仪式,从而被重塑,并与实验室及其从业人员建立联系。我们确定了驯化数据的四种主要方式。首先,通过了解数据的来源,数据从业人员划定了实验室的边界。其次,通过筛选,工作人员将样本转化为可以很好地传输的数据,同时规定了哪些数据可以进入实验室。第三,通过熟悉数据,数据从业人员了解了数据,同时也给数据打上了实验室的烙印,使数据成为实验室的一部分。最后,通过重新包装,工作人员将数据转化为知识生产的资源。通过驯化的视角,我们可以将数据经济视为一个由流动连接的家园集合,只有当数据被驯服并依附于家园时,它们才成为有价值的知识工具。这些驯化实践也对工作人员产生了广泛的影响,因为在“引入”数据的过程中,他们也逐渐成为实验室的一部分。最后,我们反思了这些驯化过程——这些过程使数据中的异常行为沉默——对数据密集型研究中产生的知识意味着什么。

相似文献

1
Domesticating data: Traveling and value-making in the data economy.本土化数据:数据经济中的流动与增值。
Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Jun;54(3):429-450. doi: 10.1177/03063127231212506. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
2
The domestication of remote monitoring: The materialisation of care?远程监护的驯化:关怀的物质化?
J Aging Stud. 2023 Dec;67:101168. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101168. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
The social life of biomedical data: Capturing, obscuring, and envisioning care in the digital safety-net.生物医学数据的社会生活:在数字安全网中捕捉、掩盖和设想护理。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;294:114670. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114670. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
Nurses' experiences of ethnographic fieldwork.护士的人种志田野调查经历。
Nurse Res. 2014 Sep;22(1):14-9. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.1.14.e1243.
5
Domesticating Social Alarm Systems in Nursing Homes: Qualitative Study of Differences in the Perspectives of Assistant Nurses.将社会警报系统本土化:助理护士视角差异的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 5;25:e44692. doi: 10.2196/44692.
6
"If no one grieves, no one will remember": Cultural palimpsests and the creation of social ties through rituals.“如果没有人悲伤,就没有人会记得”:文化的层层重叠和通过仪式创造社会联系。
Br J Sociol. 2022 Mar;73(2):244-258. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12934. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Understanding organizational and cultural premises for quality of care in nursing homes: an ethnographic study.理解养老院护理质量的组织和文化前提:一项人种志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 13;15:508. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1171-y.
8
Theorizing eldercare work: An orders of worth analysis.理论化老年护理工作:一种价值秩序分析。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2020 Apr-Jun;39(2):107-125. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2020.1740130. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Material Citizenship: An ethnographic study exploring object-person relations in the context of people with dementia in care homes.物质公民身份:一项民族志研究,探索在养老院中痴呆症患者背景下的人与物之间的关系。
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Jul;43(6):1471-1485. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13321. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
10
'I do not feel well here as such. But it has become my home': abandonment and care in healing shrines.“我在这里感觉不太好。但它已经成为了我的家”:治疗圣地中的遗弃和关怀。
Anthropol Med. 2023 Sep;30(3):278-293. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2023.2171237. Epub 2023 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Renting Valuable Assets: Knowledge and Value Production in Academic Science.租用宝贵资产:学术科学中的知识与价值创造
Sci Technol Human Values. 2021 Mar 1;46(2):275-297. doi: 10.1177/0162243920911974. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
2
E-Infrastructures and the divergent assetization of public health data: Expectations, uncertainties, and asymmetries.电子基础设施与公共卫生数据的差异化资产化:期望、不确定性和不对称性。
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Aug;51(4):606-627. doi: 10.1177/0306312721989818. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.未竟的科学:描绘社会运动和公民社会对研究议程设定的挑战
Sci Technol Human Values. 2010 Jul 1;35(4):444-473. doi: 10.1177/0162243909345836. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
4
Caring for data: Value creation in a data-intensive research laboratory.数据关怀:数据密集型研究实验室中的价值创造
Soc Stud Sci. 2020 Apr;50(2):175-197. doi: 10.1177/0306312720906567. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Courtesy work: Care practices for quality assurance in a cohort study.礼貌性工作:队列研究中质量保证的护理实践。
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Aug;49(4):583-604. doi: 10.1177/0306312719863139.
6
Metadata accounts: Achieving data and evidence in scientific research.元数据管理:实现科学研究中的数据与证据。
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Oct;49(5):732-757. doi: 10.1177/0306312719863494. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
7
Data-work and friction: Investigating the practices of repurposing healthcare data.数据工作与摩擦:研究医疗数据再利用的实践。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):558-566. doi: 10.1177/1460458219856462. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
8
Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change.订购理论:社会技术变革的类型学和概念框架。
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Oct;47(5):703-750. doi: 10.1177/0306312717709363. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology.数量会带来怎样的差异?论生物学中大数据的认识论
Big Data Soc. 2014 Jun 1;1(1). doi: 10.1177/2053951714534395.
10
Introduction: Making sense of data-driven research in the biological and biomedical sciences.引言:理解生物和生物医学科学中的数据驱动研究。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Mar;43(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 2.