Pinel Clémence
Centre for Medical Science and Technology Studies, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sci Technol Human Values. 2021 Mar 1;46(2):275-297. doi: 10.1177/0162243920911974. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
This paper explores what it takes for research laboratories to produce valuable knowledge in academic institutions marked by the coexistence of multiple evaluative frameworks. Drawing upon ethnographic fieldwork carried out in two UK-based epigenetics research laboratories, I examine the set of practices through which research groups intertwine knowledge production with the making of scientific, health and wealth value. This includes building and maintaining a portfolio of valuable resources, such as expertise, scientific credibility or data and turning these resources into assets by carefully organising and managing their value. Laboratories then put these assets to productive use within and outside their labs towards the creation or extraction of value. I identify two models for producing value within academic science: a commodity-based model whereby laboratories mobilise their assets to produce results, which can be converted into publications for the accumulation of credibility capital; and a rentier model of accumulation, whereby laboratories own valuable assets, which they rent out to others outside their lab against a revenue. Following recent developments in STS on value production in the bioeconomy, I argue that the concepts of asset and rent are essential analytical tools to get to grips with the origins of value within academic science.
本文探讨了在存在多种评估框架的学术机构中,研究实验室要产出有价值的知识需要具备哪些条件。基于在英国的两个表观遗传学研究实验室进行的人种志田野调查,我研究了研究团队将知识生产与科学、健康和财富价值创造相互交织的一系列实践。这包括建立和维护一系列有价值的资源组合,如专业知识、科学信誉或数据,并通过精心组织和管理这些资源的价值,将其转化为资产。然后,实验室在其内部和外部将这些资产用于创造或提取价值的生产性用途。我确定了学术科学中创造价值的两种模式:一种是以商品为基础的模式,实验室利用其资产产出成果,这些成果可转化为出版物以积累信誉资本;另一种是食利积累模式,实验室拥有有价值的资产,将其出租给实验室外部的其他方以获取收入。跟随科学技术与社会(STS)领域近期关于生物经济中价值生产的发展,我认为资产和租金的概念是理解学术科学中价值起源的重要分析工具。