Fischer G J
Arch Sex Behav. 1986 Dec;15(6):457-66. doi: 10.1007/BF01542310.
Students completed a questionnaire measuring acceptance of forcible date rape, attitudes toward women, sexual knowledge, sexual experience, tolerance of socially unapproved sexual behavior, and religiosity. Findings suggested that persons relatively more accepting of forcible date rape are less sure it really is rape, have more traditional attitudes toward women, are more self-sexually permissive (i.e., more tolerant of their own socially unapproved of sexual behavior, such as premarital and extramarital sex with friends or casual acquaintances), have less accurate sexual knowledge and, though a large majority blame the male, are slightly more inclined than others to blame society or the situation. These predictor variables accounted for 35% of the variance in attitudes toward forcible date rape and identified correctly about two-thirds of the students classified as nonrejectors of forcible date rape, i.e., those who did not consider the male's behavior definitely unacceptable under any one of nine circumstances, including "He spent a lot of money on her." In addition to the emotional and personality variables often cited in rapists, the cognitive predictor variables found may be salient to understanding the etiology of rape.
学生们完成了一份问卷，该问卷测量了对强迫性约会强奸的接受程度、对女性的态度、性知识、性经历、对社会不认可的性行为的容忍度以及宗教虔诚度。研究结果表明，相对更能接受强迫性约会强奸的人不太确定这真的是强奸，对女性有更传统的态度，在性方面更放纵自己（即对自己社会不认可的性行为，如与朋友或 casual acquaintances 的婚前和婚外性行为，更宽容），性知识不太准确，而且尽管绝大多数人指责男性，但他们比其他人更倾向于指责社会或这种情况。这些预测变量解释了对强迫性约会强奸态度差异的35%，并正确识别了约三分之二被归类为不拒绝强迫性约会强奸的学生，即那些在包括“他在她身上花了很多钱”在内的九种情况中的任何一种情况下，都不认为男性的行为绝对不可接受的学生。除了强奸犯中经常提到的情感和个性变量外，所发现的认知预测变量可能对理解强奸的病因很重要。
