Fischer G J
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4820.
Psychol Rep. 1991 Jun;68(3 Pt 2):1199-206. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3c.1199.
Cognitive predictors, such as relatively accepting attitudes toward forcible date rape, helped identify self-reported sexually coercive college students and were expected to help identify students voting not guilty in a simulated acquaintance rape trial. To test this hypothesis college students self-administered in random order (1) an anonymous sex survey measuring attitudes toward forcible date rape, attitudes toward women, sexual experience, including victimization, sexual permissiveness, and sexual knowledge and (2) a trial survey based on a simulated acquaintance rape trial. Only gender and cognitive variables from the trial (e.g., being male, tending to blame the victim, and uncertainty about one's verdict) identified not guilty verdicts above chance expectancy. Thus, the hypothesis that the cognitive predictors measured here would help identify students voting not guilty in a simulated acquaintance rape trial was not supported.
认知预测因素，比如对强迫性约会强奸相对接纳的态度，有助于识别自我报告有性强迫行为的大学生，并且有望帮助识别在模拟的熟人强奸审判中投票判定无罪的学生。为了验证这一假设，大学生们以随机顺序自行完成了两项调查：（1）一项匿名性调查，测量对强迫性约会强奸的态度、对女性的态度、性经历（包括受害情况）、性放纵程度以及性知识；（2）一项基于模拟熟人强奸审判的审判调查。只有来自审判的性别和认知变量（例如男性、倾向于指责受害者以及对自己的裁决不确定）能够以高于随机预期的概率识别出无罪裁决。因此，这里所测量的认知预测因素有助于识别在模拟熟人强奸审判中投票判定无罪的学生这一假设未得到支持。
