面部创伤的严重程度和部位是否是颈椎损伤的危险因素?基于使用 AO 脊柱损伤分类和综合面部损伤(CFI)评分的 10 年分析。
Are severity and location of facial trauma risk factors for cervical spine injuries? 10-year analysis based on the use of the AO spine injury classification and the comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score.
机构信息
Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience - Head & Neck, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Medical Physics Department, Foundation IRCCS San Gerardo Hospital, 20900, Monza, Italy.
出版信息
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):198-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08037-0. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
PURPOSE
This study aims to demonstrate a correlation between cervical spine injury and location and severity of facial trauma.
METHODS
We did a 10-year retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patients with at least one facial and/or cervical spine injury. We classified facial injuries using the Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) score, and stratified patients into mild (CFI < 4), moderate (4 ≤ CFI < 10) and severe facial trauma (CFI ≥ 10). The primary outcome was to recognize the severity and topography of the facial trauma which predict the probability of associated cervical spine injuries.
RESULTS
We included 1197 patients: 78% with facial injuries, 16% with spine injuries and 6% with both. According to the CFI score, 48% of patients sustained a mild facial trauma, 35% a moderate one and 17% a severe one. The midface was involved in 45% of cases, then the upper facial third (13%) and the lower one (10%). The multivariate analysis showed multiple independent risk factors for associated facial and cervical spine injuries, among them an injury of the middle facial third (OR 1.11 p 0.004) and the facial trauma severity, having every increasing point of CFI score a 6% increasing risk (OR 1.06 p 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS
Facial trauma is a risk factor for a concomitant cervical spine injury. Among multiple risk factors, severe midfacial trauma is an important red flag. The stratification of facial injuries based on the CFI score through CT-scan images could be a turning point in the management of patients at risk for cervical spine injuries before imaging is available.
目的
本研究旨在证明颈椎损伤与面部创伤的部位和严重程度之间存在相关性。
方法
我们对前瞻性收集的至少有一处面部和/或颈椎损伤的患者进行了 10 年回顾性分析。我们使用综合面部损伤(CFI)评分对面部损伤进行分类,并将患者分为轻度(CFI<4)、中度(4≤CFI<10)和重度面部创伤(CFI≥10)。主要结果是识别面部创伤的严重程度和部位,预测相关颈椎损伤的概率。
结果
我们纳入了 1197 例患者:78%有面部损伤,16%有脊柱损伤,6%两者都有。根据 CFI 评分,48%的患者为轻度面部创伤,35%为中度,17%为重度。中面部受累占 45%,然后是上面部三分之一(13%)和下三分之一(10%)。多变量分析显示,面部和颈椎损伤的多个独立危险因素,其中中面部损伤(OR 1.11,p<0.004)和面部创伤严重程度,CFI 评分每增加一分,风险增加 6%(OR 1.06,p<0.004)。
结论
面部创伤是颈椎损伤的危险因素。在多个危险因素中,严重的中面部创伤是一个重要的警示信号。基于 CT 扫描图像的 CFI 评分对面部损伤进行分层,在影像学检查可用之前,可能是管理颈椎损伤风险患者的一个转折点。