Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY.
Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 Jan;24(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
The discovery of Venetoclax (VEN) has transformed the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the response is heterogeneous with 10% to 50% of newly diagnosed AML patients not responding to hypomethylating agent (HMA) and VEN. Furthermore, up to 40% of responding patients relapse shortly. This review discusses the mechanism of action of Venetoclax and the major mechanisms of inherent and acquired resistance to VEN. VEN is highly specific to BCL-2 binding, as such other antiapoptotic proteins in BCL-2 family induce resistance. These antiapoptotic proteins can also be upregulated via a number of compensatory cell signaling pathways including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, the MAPK/ERK pathway, and mutant FLT3-ITD. Mutations can occur in BCL-2 and BAX proteins, or they can be silenced by TP53 mutations and other epigenetic changes. Changes to mitochondrial structure and metabolism can induce resistance. Key metabolic regulators include OXPHOS and alternative amino acid metabolism. Finally microenvironmental factors can influence VEN responses. This paper evaluates subsets of AML by differentiation, histology, cytogenetics and molecular markers and their different responses to VEN; with spliceosome mutations, ASXL1, NPM1 and IDH1/2 being favorable while others such as FLT3, TP53 and BCL-2 mutations being less responsive. Currently intensive multiagent chemotherapy and Venetoclax combinations such as 7+3+VEN are favored in fit younger AML patients. However, with resistant patients' subsets targeted combination therapies are becoming an increasingly attractive option. We explore the incorporation of non-BCL-2 inhibitors, next-generation BCL-2 and multi-protein agents, other inhibitors most prominently FLT-3 inhibitors in addition to Venetoclax, and other novel approaches for resolving Venetoclax resistance.
维奈克拉(VEN)的发现改变了急性髓系白血病(AML)和慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的治疗格局。然而,反应存在异质性,10%至 50%的新诊断 AML 患者对低甲基化剂(HMA)和 VEN 无反应。此外,多达 40%的应答患者会很快复发。本文讨论了 Venetoclax 的作用机制以及对 VEN 固有和获得性耐药的主要机制。VEN 高度特异性地结合 BCL-2,因此 BCL-2 家族中的其他抗凋亡蛋白会诱导耐药。这些抗凋亡蛋白还可以通过多种补偿性细胞信号通路上调,包括 PI3K/AKT/mTOR、MAPK/ERK 通路和突变型 FLT3-ITD。BCL-2 和 BAX 蛋白可以发生突变,也可以被 TP53 突变和其他表观遗传变化沉默。线粒体结构和代谢的变化也可以诱导耐药。关键的代谢调节剂包括 OXPHOS 和替代氨基酸代谢。最后,微环境因素也会影响 VEN 的反应。本文通过分化、组织学、细胞遗传学和分子标志物评估 AML 的亚组及其对 VEN 的不同反应;剪接体突变、ASXL1、NPM1 和 IDH1/2 是有利的,而其他突变如 FLT3、TP53 和 BCL-2 则反应较差。目前,适合年轻 AML 患者的强化多药化疗和 Venetoclax 联合方案(如 7+3+VEN)受到青睐。然而,对于耐药患者的亚组,靶向联合治疗正成为一种越来越有吸引力的选择。我们探讨了非 BCL-2 抑制剂、下一代 BCL-2 和多蛋白药物、除 Venetoclax 以外的其他抑制剂(尤其是 FLT-3 抑制剂)以及解决 Venetoclax 耐药性的其他新方法的应用。