• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

薇乔缝线与传统缝线在经阴道宫颈环扎术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Mersilene tape versus conventional sutures in transvaginal cervical cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China.

Guangxi Medical University, Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 25;23(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06141-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-06141-z
PMID:38007447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10675920/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Mersilene tape versus alternative suture types in prolonging singleton pregnancies as well as other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, in cases of history-, ultrasound-, and exam-indicated cervical cerclage.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing different suture types in cervical cerclage procedures. The primary outcome of interest was preterm birth (PTB) rate < 37, <35, < 28, and < 24 weeks. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the relationship between suture type and various outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of five studies, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective studies, with a combined participation of 2325 individuals, were included. The pooled analysis indicated no significant association between suture type and PTB at less than 37 weeks of gestation (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.65-1.60, p < 0.01, I = 74%). Women who received Mersilene tape had a higher risk of PTB at 34-37 weeks (RR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.57-4.37, p = 0.69, I = 0%), but a lower risk of PTB at less than 34 weeks (RR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28-0.66, p = 0.66, I = 46%). No statistically significant differences were observed for PTB before 28 weeks (RR: 1, 95% CI: 0.65-1.53, p = 0.70, I = 0%), before 24 weeks (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.23, p = 0.33, I = 0%), incidence of chorioamnionitis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 020-4.83, p < 0.01, I = 95%), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.28-2.22, p = 0.08, I = 67%) and neonatal death (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.42-2.35, p = 0.17, I = 48%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that Mersilene tape does not reduce the risk of PTB before 37, 28 or 24 weeks. We observed higher risk of preterm birth between 34 and 37 weeks with Mersilene tape but lower incidence before 34 weeks, a period with higher neonatal morbidity and mortality. Due to the limited number of studies, our results and their clinical significance should be interpreted with caution.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 Mersilene 带与替代缝线类型在延长单胎妊娠方面的有效性,以及在有宫颈环扎指征的病史、超声和检查情况下,其他妊娠和新生儿结局。

方法

进行了系统评价,以确定比较不同缝线类型在宫颈环扎术中的相关研究。主要结局是早产(PTB)发生率 <37 周、<35 周、<28 周和 <24 周。进行了统计学分析,以确定缝线类型与各种结局之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 5 项研究,包括 3 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 2 项回顾性研究,共纳入 2325 人。汇总分析表明,缝线类型与妊娠 37 周前的早产(RR:1.02,95%CI:0.65-1.60,p<0.01,I²=74%)无显著相关性。使用 Mersilene 带的女性发生妊娠 34-37 周的早产风险较高(RR:2.62,95%CI:1.57-4.37,p=0.69,I²=0%),但发生妊娠 34 周前的早产风险较低(RR:0.43,95%CI:0.28-0.66,p=0.66,I²=46%)。在妊娠 28 周前(RR:1,95%CI:0.65-1.53,p=0.70,I²=0%)和妊娠 24 周前(RR:0.86,95%CI:0.60-1.23,p=0.33,I²=0%)、绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率(RR:0.97,95%CI:0.20-4.83,p<0.01,I²=95%)、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入住率(RR:0.79,95%CI:0.28-2.22,p=0.08,I²=67%)和新生儿死亡率(RR:1.00,95%CI:0.42-2.35,p=0.17,I²=48%)方面,缝线类型之间无统计学差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,Mersilene 带并不能降低妊娠 37 周、28 周或 24 周前的早产风险。我们观察到 Mersilene 带与妊娠 34-37 周之间的早产风险较高,但妊娠 34 周前的早产发生率较低,这一时期新生儿发病率和死亡率较高。由于研究数量有限,我们的结果及其临床意义应谨慎解读。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/462f43392870/12884_2023_6141_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/04fe5d6ec64e/12884_2023_6141_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/b6c166f20ad1/12884_2023_6141_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/d8d72f3044f8/12884_2023_6141_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/462f43392870/12884_2023_6141_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/04fe5d6ec64e/12884_2023_6141_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/b6c166f20ad1/12884_2023_6141_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/d8d72f3044f8/12884_2023_6141_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336d/10675920/462f43392870/12884_2023_6141_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mersilene tape versus conventional sutures in transvaginal cervical cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.薇乔缝线与传统缝线在经阴道宫颈环扎术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 25;23(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06141-z.
2
A comparison of Mersilene tape versus braided suture in transvaginal cervical cerclage: A retrospective case-control study.经阴道宫颈环扎术中使用医用缝线 versus 编织缝线的比较:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;167(2):743-752. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15715. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
3
Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.宫颈环扎术联合其他治疗方法用于预防单胎妊娠自发性早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 24;9(9):CD012871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012871.pub2.
4
Suture thickness and transvaginal cervical cerclage outcomes.缝线厚度与经阴道宫颈环扎术结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Nov;1(4):100056. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100056. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy.宫颈环扎术预防多胎妊娠早产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 10;2014(9):CD009166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009166.pub2.
6
Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies with short cervical length or cervical dilatation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈环扎术预防宫颈长度短或宫颈扩张的双胎妊娠早产及不良围产结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2023 Aug 3;20(8):e1004266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004266. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.宫颈环扎术用于预防单胎妊娠早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3.
8
Cerclage for sonographic short cervix in singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data.超声检查宫颈短的单胎妊娠孕妇行环扎术以预防自发性早产史:使用个体患者水平数据的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):569-577. doi: 10.1002/uog.17457. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.宫颈环扎术用于预防单胎妊娠早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18(4):CD008991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub2.
10
Cervical cerclage for short cervix at 24 to 26 weeks of gestation: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data.24 至 26 孕周短宫颈行宫颈环扎术:采用个体患者水平数据的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jun;5(6):100930. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100930. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-conceptional laparoscopic cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review.孕前腹腔镜宫颈环扎术预防早产:一项系统评价
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2025 Jun 27;17(2):149-156. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.2024.13388.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical cerclage technique: what do experts actually achieve?宫颈环扎术技术:专家实际能达到什么效果?
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul;5(7):100961. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100961. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Monofilament vs multifilament suture for cervical cerclage: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.单丝缝线与多丝缝线用于宫颈环扎术的多中心随机对照试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Feb;5(2):100823. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100823. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
3
Perioperative complications of a transvaginal cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
单胎妊娠经阴道宫颈环扎术的围手术期并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5):521-534.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.026. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
4
Monofilament suture versus braided suture thread to improve pregnancy outcomes after vaginal cervical cerclage (C-STICH): a pragmatic randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial.单丝缝线与编织缝线在阴道宫颈环扎术后改善妊娠结局的比较(C-STICH):一项实用随机、对照、3 期优效性试验。
Lancet. 2022 Oct 22;400(10361):1426-1436. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01808-6.
5
Cervical Cerclage: Green-top Guideline No. 75.宫颈环扎术:绿皮书指南第75号。
BJOG. 2022 Jun;129(7):1178-1210. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17003. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Suture thickness and transvaginal cervical cerclage outcomes.缝线厚度与经阴道宫颈环扎术结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Nov;1(4):100056. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100056. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
7
Strap stabilization for proximal junctional kyphosis prevention in instrumented posterior spinal fusion.后路脊柱融合术中使用器械预防近端交界性后凸的棘突间稳定
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jun;29(6):1287-1296. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06291-0. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
8
Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension: The Mulayim Technique.改良腹腔镜外侧悬吊术:穆莱姆技术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Mar-Apr;26(3):407-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
9
Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.宫颈环扎术用于预防单胎妊娠早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3.
10
Preterm Birth Prevention Post-Conization: A Model of Cervical Length Screening with Targeted Cerclage.锥切术后预防早产:宫颈长度筛查联合靶向性宫颈环扎术模型
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0163793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163793. eCollection 2016.