• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态视野检查的最佳运动速率

Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry.

作者信息

Johnson C A, Keltner J L

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1987 Jan;105(1):73-5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010079035.

DOI:10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010079035
PMID:3800748
Abstract

Duration, reliability, and sensitivity of kinetic thresholds were evaluated for the I/4e, I/2e, and I/1e Goldmann-equivalent targets as a function of stimulus velocity (1 degrees to 8 degrees/s) using the SQUID automated perimeter. For all targets, the average duration of kinetic meridional scans decreased significantly as stimulus velocity increased from 1 degrees to 4 degrees/s. Minimal reductions in kinetic scan times were present for stimulus velocities above 4 degrees/s. All targets appeared to have reductions in sensitivity at velocities above 4 degrees/s (target detection occurring at more central visual field locations) that were presumably related to the observers' reaction times. There were no consistent differences in the variability of kinetic thresholds for different stimulus velocities. When all factors were considered, a stimulus velocity of 4 degrees/s seemed to be optimal for kinetic scans of all targets in the central and peripheral visual field.

摘要

使用超导量子干涉装置自动视野计,评估了I/4e、I/2e和I/1e戈德曼等效视标在刺激速度(1度/秒至8度/秒)变化时的运动阈值的持续时间、可靠性和敏感性。对于所有视标,随着刺激速度从1度/秒增加到4度/秒,运动子午线扫描的平均持续时间显著缩短。刺激速度高于4度/秒时,运动扫描时间的减少最小。所有视标在速度高于4度/秒时似乎敏感性降低(目标检测出现在更中心的视野位置),这可能与观察者的反应时间有关。不同刺激速度下运动阈值的变异性没有一致的差异。综合考虑所有因素,4度/秒的刺激速度似乎是中央和周边视野中所有视标运动扫描的最佳速度。

相似文献

1
Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry.动态视野检查的最佳运动速率
Arch Ophthalmol. 1987 Jan;105(1):73-5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010079035.
2
Evaluation of stimulus velocity in automated kinetic perimetry in young healthy participants.年轻健康受试者自动动态视野检查中刺激速度的评估
Vision Res. 2014 May;98:83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
3
Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction.自动动态视野检查中的反应时间:刺激亮度、离心率和运动方向的影响。
Vision Res. 2001 Jul;41(16):2157-64. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00088-8.
4
Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm (program k) for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.开发一种用于检测青光眼性视野缺损的新型全自动动力学算法(程序k)。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Mar 5;56(3):2092-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16182.
5
Physiologic statokinetic dissociation is eliminated by equating static and kinetic perimetry testing procedures.通过使静态和动态视野检查程序相等,消除生理静态-动态分离。
J Vis. 2016 Nov 1;16(14):5. doi: 10.1167/16.14.5.
6
Learning effect and repeatability of automated kinetic perimetry in healthy participants.健康受试者自动动态视野检查的学习效应和可重复性
Curr Eye Res. 2014 Sep;39(9):928-37. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.888450. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
7
[Automated kinetic perimetry using different stimulus velocities].[使用不同刺激速度的自动动态视野检查法]
Ophthalmologe. 2001 Feb;98(2):168-73. doi: 10.1007/s003470170179.
8
Evaluation of kinetic programs in various automated perimeters.各种自动视野计中动力学程序的评估。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;61(4):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s10384-017-0516-y. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
9
The influence of stimulus size on measured visual field extent in infants.刺激大小对婴儿测量视野范围的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Oct;80(10):698-702. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200310000-00011.
10
A comparison of manual kinetic and automated static perimetry in obtaining ptosis fields.手动动态视野检查与自动静态视野检查在获取上睑下垂视野方面的比较。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan;118(1):65-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.1.65.

引用本文的文献

1
Does intraocular straylight predict night driving visual performance? Correlations between straylight levels and contrast sensitivity, halo size, and hazard recognition distance with and without glare.眼内杂散光能否预测夜间驾驶视觉表现?有眩光和无眩光情况下杂散光水平与对比敏感度、光晕大小及危险识别距离之间的相关性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 13;16:910620. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.910620. eCollection 2022.
2
Functional characteristics of glaucoma related arcuate defects seen on OCT en face visualisation of the retinal nerve fibre layer.OCT 眼前节断层成像对视神经纤维层弓形缺损的青光眼相关功能特征。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Mar;41(2):437-446. doi: 10.1111/opo.12780. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
Differences in Static and Kinetic Perimetry Results are Eliminated in Retinal Disease when Psychophysical Procedures are Equated.
当心理物理学程序相同时,视网膜疾病中静态和动态视野检查结果的差异会被消除。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Oct 1;7(5):22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.5.22. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
Effects of mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants.散瞳和缩瞳对正常受试者动态视野检查结果的影响。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;253(8):1341-6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3048-5. Epub 2015 May 19.
5
Effects of different levels of intraocular stray light on kinetic perimetry findings.不同水平的眼内杂散光对动态视野检查结果的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0127159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127159. eCollection 2015.
6
The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.使用半自动动态视野计(SKP)监测晚期青光眼视野缺损。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;246(9):1331-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0828-1. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
7
K-Train--a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate.K-Train——一个基于计算机的交互式培训项目,带有用于动态视野检查实践的内置认证系统:接受度和成功率评估
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;244(10):1300-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0291-9. Epub 2006 Mar 21.
8
[Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry].[传统视野检查技术 第2部分:对照视野检查——动态视野计检查]
Ophthalmologe. 2005 Aug;102(8):821-7; quiz 828-9. doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1212-8.
9
The accuracy of confrontation visual field test in comparison with automated perimetry.与自动视野计相比,面对面视野测试的准确性。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Oct;83(10):895-8.