《金发姑娘与死亡机器人：对公开同行评论的回应》 - Suppr | 超能文献

Goldilocks and the Thanatron: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries.

作者信息

Pullman Daryl

机构信息

Centre for Bioethics, Memorial University.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2023 Dec;23(12):W4-W6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2280105. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2023.2280105

Abstract

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

相似文献

1

Goldilocks and the Thanatron: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries.《金发姑娘与死亡机器人：对公开同行评论的回应》

Am J Bioeth. 2023 Dec;23(12):W4-W6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2280105. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

2

Goldilocks: a tool for identifying genomic regions that are 'just right'.金发姑娘：一种用于识别“恰到好处”的基因组区域的工具。

Bioinformatics. 2016 Jul 1;32(13):2047-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw116. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

3

An Open Dialogue on Health Disparities and Structural Racism: Response to Open Peer Commentaries.关于健康差异与结构性种族主义的公开对话：对公开同行评论的回应

Am J Bioeth. 2022 Sep;22(9):W1-W3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1895365. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

4

Goldilocks and RNA: where Mg2+ concentration is just right.金童玉女和 RNA：镁离子浓度恰到好处。

Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 May 8;51(8):3529-3539. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad124.

5

Goldilocks Mastectomy with Bilateral In Situ Nipple Preservation Via Dermal Pedicle.通过真皮蒂进行双侧原位乳头保留的金凤花切除术

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 20;6(4):e1748. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001748. eCollection 2018 Apr.

6

Identity and Liberalism in Public Health: A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.

Am J Bioeth. 2022 Oct;22(10):W1-W5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1974977. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

7

Can Childcare Work Be Designed to Promote High Intensity Physical Activity for Improved Fitness and Health? A Proof of Concept Study of the Goldilocks Principle.儿童保育工作能否通过设计来促进高强度的身体活动，以提高健康和体能？金氏原则的概念验证研究。

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20):7419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207419.

8

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Privacy and Health Practices in the Digital Age".对《数字时代的隐私与健康实践》的公开同行评论的回应。

Am J Bioeth. 2022 Dec;22(12):W5-W8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2127972. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

9

Engaging with a peer-proposed, additional exploitation condition: response to open peer commentaries on "transnational gestational surrogacy: does it have to be exploitative?".

Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(5):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.901806.

10

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Solidarity and Community Engagement in Global Health Research".对《全球卫生研究中的团结与社区参与》公开同行评论的回应

Am J Bioeth. 2020 Aug;20(8):W14-W16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1777356.

引用本文的文献

1

Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying System can Enable Healthcare Serial Killing.加拿大的医疗协助死亡制度可能会助长医疗连环杀人行为。

HEC Forum. 2025 Mar;37(1):65-105. doi: 10.1007/s10730-024-09528-3. Epub 2024 Aug 2.