Bokemeyer Frederike, Lebherz Lisa, Bokemeyer Carsten, Derksen Jeroen W G, Schulz Holger, Bleich Christiane
Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Center for Oncology, II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Apr;19(2):701-712. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01501-2. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
Often, cancer patients do not receive education about the negative consequences of smoking on the treatment outcome. To support cancer patients in the process of smoking cessation, it is essential to involve oncology staff. This study aims to learn about the experiences and attitudes from the point of view of oncology staff and, thus, how a smoking intervention should be designed. The study aims to engage all oncology staff due to the unclear responsibility for providing smoking cessation education, support, and motivating cancer patients to quit smoking.
N = 354 German oncology staff (oncologists, nurses, psycho-oncologists, others) filled out a 5-point Likert scale-based questionnaire regarding practices, potential barriers, and attitudes towards smoking cessation between October 2021 and June 2022. The questionnaire was developed by Derksen et al. (2020), translated and slightly modified for the use of this study. It was distributed to all leading oncology staff in our Cancer Center Network with a request to share with all oncology staff. Flyers were also handed out in all oncology wards and outpatient clinics in the same Cancer Center Network.
Most oncology staff ask cancer patients about their current smoking status (curative, M = 2.27; SD = 1.59; palliative, M = 2.90; SD = 1.83), but they rarely treat or refer patients for a smoking cessation intervention (curative, M = 4.78; SD = 1.20; palliative, M = 4.99; SD = 1.06). Smoking behavior of curative cancer patients is addressed more than that of palliative cancer patients (d = - 37). Regression analyses of key dependent variables showed that profession, setting, and the belief that continued smoking affects treatment outcome explained the variance of asking patients if they smoke, advising to stop smoking and lack of time (without profession).
Involving oncology staff in motivating cancer patients who smoke to quit and referring them to smoking cessation services should take the different attitudes and knowledge of the staff into account to improve treatment that supports tobacco cessation.
Cancer patients have special needs when it comes to a cessation program. In the long term, survivors will benefit from tailored smoking cessation education and services provided by oncology staff to help them quit smoking after a cancer diagnosis.
癌症患者往往未接受关于吸烟对治疗结果的负面影响的教育。为了在戒烟过程中支持癌症患者,肿瘤学工作人员的参与至关重要。本研究旨在了解肿瘤学工作人员的经验和态度,从而确定应如何设计吸烟干预措施。由于提供戒烟教育、支持以及激励癌症患者戒烟的责任不明确,该研究旨在让所有肿瘤学工作人员参与进来。
2021年10月至2022年6月期间,354名德国肿瘤学工作人员(肿瘤学家、护士、心理肿瘤学家及其他人员)填写了一份基于5点李克特量表的问卷,内容涉及实践、潜在障碍以及对戒烟的态度。该问卷由德克森等人(2020年)编制,为适用于本研究进行了翻译和轻微修改。问卷分发给了我们癌症中心网络的所有主要肿瘤学工作人员,并要求他们与所有肿瘤学工作人员分享。传单也在同一癌症中心网络的所有肿瘤病房和门诊诊所发放。
大多数肿瘤学工作人员会询问癌症患者当前的吸烟状况(根治性治疗患者,M = 2.27;标准差 = 1.59;姑息性治疗患者,M = 2.90;标准差 = 1.83),但他们很少对患者进行戒烟干预或转诊(根治性治疗患者,M = 4.78;标准差 = 1.20;姑息性治疗患者,M = 4.99;标准差 = 1.06)。根治性癌症患者的吸烟行为比姑息性癌症患者得到更多关注(效应量d = -0.37)。对关键因变量的回归分析表明,职业、工作环境以及认为持续吸烟会影响治疗结果的信念解释了询问患者是否吸烟、建议戒烟以及时间不足(不考虑职业因素)的差异。
让肿瘤学工作人员参与激励吸烟的癌症患者戒烟并将他们转诊至戒烟服务机构时,应考虑工作人员的不同态度和知识,以改善支持戒烟的治疗。
在戒烟计划方面,癌症患者有特殊需求。从长远来看,幸存者将受益于肿瘤学工作人员提供的量身定制的戒烟教育和服务,以帮助他们在癌症诊断后戒烟。